Calculating Therapeutic Compliance

An Ethnographic Account of Numerical Inference and Interference in Mobile Health Care

  • Martina Klausner Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin


This article discusses calculation practices in the development of a monitoring device, aimed at improving therapeutic compliance of children and teenagers suffering from a deformation of the spine. In managing the complexities of physical parameters, therapeutic measures and interventions in every day life, numbers are central participants in inferring from and interfering into bodies and behaviours. Numbers are input and output of such monitoring systems, translating, circulating and visualizing body conditions, therapeutic effects and suggesting action. At the core of this generative process of capturing and interpreting data are algorithms as common participants of managing the complexities of vast amounts of data and providing the basis for interference in people’s lives. They process data and provide seemingly unambiguous numerical outcome, based on mathematical-technological processing of information. Attending to the incremental process of “learning algorithms” as central part of the system’s development allows me to describe the robustness of certain modes of inference. Beyond using the specific case as an exemplary for computer-based numerical inference and interference, the article is an attempt to probe and complement two theoretical approaches to the numerical management of complexity: Helen Verran’s focus on numbers’ performative properties and the potential tensions arising from divergent numerical orderings; and Paul Kockelman’s sieving of inferential and indexical chains along the generation of meaning and ontological transformativities.


Download data is not yet available.


Asdal K (2008) Enacting Things Through Numbers: Taking nature into account/ing. Geoforum 39: 123-132.

Ballestero A (2015) The Ethics of a Formula: Calculating a financial–humanitarian price for water. American Ethnologist 42: 262-278.

Bauer S (2008) Mining Data, Gathering Variables and Recombining Information: the flexible architecture of epidemiological studies. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39: 415-428.

Callon M and Muniesa F (2005) Peripheral Vision. Organization Studies 26: 1229-1250.

Cochoy F (2008) Calculation, Qualculation, Calqulation: shopping cart arithmetic, equipped cognition and the clustered consumer. Marketing theory 8: 15-44.

Domingos P (2012) A Few Useful Things to Know About Machine Learning. Communications of the ACM 55: 78-87.

Dourish P (2016) Algorithms and Their Others: Algorithmic culture in context. Big Data & Society 3: 2053951716665128.

Gillespie T (2014) The Relevance of Algorithms. In: Gillespie T, Boczkowski P and Foot K (eds) Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Guyon I, Gunn S, Nikravesh M, et al. (2008) Feature Extraction: Foundations and Applications: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Hacking I (1990) The Taming of Chance: Cambridge University Press.

Kockelman P (2011) Biosemiosis, Technocognition, and Sociogenesis. Selection and significance in a multiverse of sieving and serendipity. Current Anthropology 52: 000-000.

Kockelman P (2013a) The Anthropology of an Equation. Sieves, spam filters, agentive algorithms, and ontologies of transformation. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3: 33-61.

Kockelman P (2013b) Huckleberry Finn takes the Turing test: The transformation of ontologies and the virtuality of kinds. Language & Communication 33: 150-154.

Kockelman P (2013c) Information is the Enclosure of Meaning: Cybernetics, semiotics, and alternative theories of information. Language & Communication 33: 115-127.

Kockelman P (2017) The Art of Interpretation in the Age of Computation: Oxford University Press.

Kockelman P and Bernstein A. (2012) Semiotic Technologies, Temporal Reckoning, and the Portability of Meaning. Or: Modern modes of temporality–just how abstract are they? Anthropological Theory 12: 320-348.

Lalor BJ (1997) The Classification of Peirce's Interpretants. Semiotica 114: 31-40.

Lave J (1988) Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life: Cambridge University Press.

Mackenzie A (2014) Multiplying Numbers Differently: An epidemiology of contagious convolution. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 15: 189-207.

MacKenzie A (2017) Machine Learners. Archaeology of a data practice. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Maurer B (2013) Transacting Ontologies. Kockelman's sieves and a Bayesian anthropology. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3: 63-75.

Neyland, D (2018) Something and Nothing. On algorithmic deletion, accountability and value. Science & Technology Studies 3.

Peirce CS (1974) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Porter TM (1996) Trust in Numbers. The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life: Princeton University Press.

Suchman L (2007) Human-Machine Reconfigurations. Plans and situated actions: Cambridge University Press.

Verran H (2001) Science and an African Logic: University of Chicago Press.

Verran H (2010) Number as an Inventive Frontier in Knowing and Working Australia's Water Resources. Anthropological Theory 10: 171-178.

Verran H (2011) The Changing Lives of Measures and Values. From centre stage in the fading 'disciplinary' society to pervasive background instrument in the emergent 'control' society. The Sociological Review 59: 60-72.

Verran H (2012) Numbers. In: Lury C and Wakeford N (eds) Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social. London, New York: Routledge.

Verran H (2013) Numbers Performing Nature in Quantitative Valuing. Nature Cultures 2: 23-37.

Verran H (2014) Anthropology as Ontology is Comparison as Ontology. Theorizing the Contemporary.

Zaloom C (2003) Ambiguous Numbers. Trading technologies and interpretation in financial markets. American Ethnologist 30: 258-272.

Ziewitz M (2015) Governing Algorithms. Science, Technology, & Human Values 41: 3-16.