Science & Technology Studies <div class="region region-content-intro"> <div id="block-block-6" class="block block-block"> <div class="content"> <p>Science &amp; Technology Studies is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the advancement of scholarly studies of science and technology as socio-material phenomena, including their historical and contemporary production and their associated forms of knowledge, expertise, social organization and controversy. This includes interest in developing Science and Technology Studies' own knowledge production techniques, methodology and interventions. The journal welcomes high quality contributions to that are based on substantial theoretical or empirical engagement with the multidisciplinary field of science and technology studies, including contributions from anthropology, sociology, history, philosophy, political science, educational science and communication studies.</p> <p>Science &amp; Technology Studies is the official journal of the European Association for the Study of Science and Technology (EASST) and the Finnish Association for Science and Technology Studies.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> </div> </div> </div> European Association for the Study of Science and Technology and Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studie en-US Science & Technology Studies 2243-4690 <p><strong>Terms &amp; Conditions</strong></p> <p>This Science &amp; Technology Studies website ("Site") is owned and operated by <em>The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies</em> (“Society”). <em>The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies</em> and its publication <em>Science &amp; Technology Studies</em> are non-profit organizations.</p> <p>By accessing or using the Site, you agree to be bound by the terms and conditions below ("Terms and Conditions"). These Terms and Conditions incorporate by reference and include the Site's Privacy Policy and any guidelines, rules or disclaimers that may be posted and updated on specific web pages or on notices that are sent to you. If you do not agree with these Terms and Conditions, please do not use this Site.</p> <p>The Society reserves the right to change, modify, add or remove portions of these Terms and Conditions at its discretion at any time and without prior notice. Please check this page periodically for any modifications. Your continued use of this Site following the posting of any changes will mean that you have accepted the changes.</p> <p><strong>Copyrights and Limitations on Use</strong></p> <p>Content on this website is protected by Creative Commons license <a href="" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CC BY 4.0</a>.&nbsp; The copyright of articles remains with the authors but the license permits other users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the published articles. Using and sharing the content is permitted as long as original materials are appropriately credited. Metadata (e.g. the article title) is an exeption - this is licensed under <a href="">CC0</a> that permits the distribution of the article information - not content - in archives and databases.&nbsp;</p> <p>The Site may contain robot exclusion headers, and by using the Site you agree that you will not use any robots, spiders, crawlers or other automated downloading programs or devices to access, search, index, monitor or copy any Content. The harvesting of postal or email addresses from the Site for purposes of sending unsolicited or unauthorized commercial material, is prohibited.&nbsp;</p> <p>You may not use the services on the Site to publish or distribute any information (including software or other content) that is illegal; violates or infringes upon the rights of any other person; is abusive, hateful, profane, pornographic, threatening or vulgar; contains errors, viruses or other harmful components; or is otherwise actionable by law. Science &amp; Technology Studies may at any time exercise editorial control over the content of any information or material that is submitted or distributed through its facilities and/or services.</p> <p>You may not, without the approval of Science &amp; Technology Studies, use the Site to publish or distribute any advertising, promotional material, or solicitation to other users of the Site to use any goods or services. For example (but without limitation), you may not use the Site to conduct any business, to solicit the performance of any activity that is prohibited by law, or to solicit other users to become subscribers of other information services. Similarly, you may not use the Site to download and redistribute public information or shareware for personal gain or use the facilities and/or services to distribute multiple copies of public domain information or shareware.</p> <p><strong>Trademarks</strong></p> <p>All trademarks appearing on this Site are the property of their respective owners.</p> <p><strong>Links to Other Sites</strong></p> <p>The Site may contain hyperlinks to other sites or resources that are provided solely for your convenience. Science &amp; Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability of external sites or resources linked to the Site, and does not endorse and is not responsible or liable for any content, advertising, products or other materials on or available from such sites or resources. Transactions that occur between you and any third party are strictly between you and the third party and are not the responsibility of Science &amp; Technology Studies. Due to the fact that Science &amp; Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability or accuracy of these outside resources or their contents, you should review the terms and conditions and privacy policies of these linked sites, as their policies may differ from ours.</p> <p>Last revised: 3 Aug 2020</p> Prasad Amit (2023) Science Studies Meets Colonialism Aysel Sultan Copyright (c) 2023 Aysel Sultan 2024-02-15 2024-02-15 37 1 82 84 10.23987/sts.136097 Bruun Maja Hoejer, Hasse Catherine, Hoeyer Klaus, Wahlberg Ayo, Douglas-Jones Rachel, Kristensen Dorthe Brogaard and Winthereik Brit Ross (eds) (2022) Palgrave Handbook of the Anthropology of Technology Sally Wyatt Klaus Hoeyer Brit Ross Winthereik Copyright (c) 2023 Sally Wyatt, Klaus Hoeyer, Brit Ross Winthereik 2024-02-15 2024-02-15 37 1 85 88 10.23987/sts.131702 The Valuable Plurality of the Citizen Sciences <p>Citizen science is a multilayered concept. Although it is generally understood as a form of public engagement with science and technology, it can take various forms, with widely different roles for citizens. Despite this vastness, a “contributory” strand of citizen science dominates the field, which formally limits citizens’ roles to those of data gatherers for professional scientists or experts. This has led critics to argue that citizen science is not as inclusive, socially transformative, or democratizing as its advocates claim, and to appeals by scholars, practitioners, and policymakers for more dialogue and deliberation in all stages of citizen science processes. In this piece, we share our reflections on these questions drawing on our experiences as participant observers in contributory citizen science projects in various parts of the world. Responding to the above critiques, we illustrate how such projects can have emancipatory potential in terms of impacting policy agendas, inciting behavioral change, and engaging hard-to-reach societal groups. We argue that the future of citizen science lies in pluralizing the citizen sciences by experimenting with various modes of democratic representation, participation, and deliberation.</p> Michiel Van Oudheusden Anna Berti Suman Tine Huyse Huib Huyse Fabien Medvecky Copyright (c) 2023 Michiel Van Oudheusden, Anna Berti-Suman, Tine Huyse, Huib Huyse, Fabien Medvecky 2024-02-15 2024-02-15 37 1 10 20 10.23987/sts.126210 Science & Technology Studies <p>The first edition of Science &amp; Technology Studies, then named Science Studies, became available in 1988. Over the past 35 years, the journal has established itself as a prominent international publication, experiencing significant growth in publication volume, manuscript submissions, and readership. This editorial commemorates these achievements and reflects on the journal's evolution. A key aspect of this exploration is our journal's role in the Open Access movement, which both enhances transparency and offers new tools for the analysis. The sections delve further into the topic of the scholarly impact of STS, starting with a discussion of impact factor metrics followed by insights from our Editorial Team. The paper then utilizes the extensive archives of the journal and the capabilities of new tools to explore reader engagement with our publications. The editorial concludes with a discussion of our way forward into the next years and decades.</p> Antti Silvast Copyright (c) 2024 Antti Silvast 2024-02-15 2024-02-15 37 1 2 9 10.23987/sts.142699 “Should We Stay or Should We Go now?” <p>In this paper we focus on a special feature of science and technology studies: the trajectories of our engagement with ‘emerging technosciences’. Many of us entertain close links to a particular group of scientists; our scholarly careers and identities build around thematic specialisations, trans-field collaborations and convivialities. But more often than not, such engagement does not last a whole career. With every new technoscientific hype, scholars are pressed to ‘move on’, to disengage from one field and re-engage with another. It thus seems warranted to explicitly reflect on the temporal patterns of dis/engagement and to look at possible ramifications for individuals, collectives, and the innovation system at large. To inform such reflection, we opted for a mixed-methods approach, tracing patterns and moments of dis/engagement across various disciplines based on scientometric analysis, individual archaeologies of engagement, a qualitative survey, and a focused discussion among fellow scholars from the social sciences and humanities as well as the sciences. Our analysis brings distinct dis/engagement patterns to the fore, relating to disciplinary affiliations as well as career stages. In our conclusion, we discuss the relevance of these findings for science and technology studies scholars and technoscientists as well as for contemporary innovation regimes more generally.</p> Karen Kastenhofer Niki Vermeulen Copyright (c) 2023 Karen Kastenhofer, Niki Vermeulen 2024-02-15 2024-02-15 37 1 21 43 10.23987/sts.113479 Questions and Explanations in Sociology <p>This is a study of an action research project conducted in one of the biggest university departments for sociology in a Central Eastern European capital during the first half of the 2000s. The paper shows that researchers’ images of society have a strong impact on social scientific methodology, scientific explanations and narratives. I offer an example of how realist approaches to science and technology studies can be used in a field study and discuss the benefits and limitations of such an endeavor, which I define as an interpretive and explanatory social scientific work. The analysis shows ways in which latent knowledge structures influenced the wording of a questionnaire used in the research, the types of data that were gathered, and how the data were interpreted. These knowledge structures include notions concerning local policy discussions, different social policy traditions, and images of a Roma minority struggling with the effects of structural poverty and prejudices.</p> Judit Gárdos Copyright (c) 2023 Judit Gárdos 2024-02-15 2024-02-15 37 1 44 59 10.23987/sts.111856 University Campus Living Labs <p>Universities and their changing role in society is a source of perennial debate. In this article, we examine the emergent phenomenon of <em>University Campus Living Labs (UCLL)</em>, the set of practices by which universities use their own buildings, streets or energy infrastructure as experimental settings in order to support applied teaching, research and co-creation with society. While most existing studies of UCLLs focus on them as sustainability instruments, we explore the UCLL phenomenon from an open-ended and fresh angle. Using living labs in five European universities as exemplary cases, we demonstrate the breadth and variability of this emerging phenomenon through five analytical dimensions to unpack the multiple forms and purposes that UCLLs can have. We furthermore consider aspects of inclusiveness and situatedness of living lab co-creation and testing and what the UCLL phenomena may come to mean for the continuously changing university, calling for future studies to substantiate these aspects.</p> Sophie Nyborg Maja Horst Cian O’Donovan Gunter Bombaerts Meiken Hansen Makoto Takahashi Gianluigi Viscusi Bozena Ryszawska Copyright (c) 2023 Sophie Nyborg, Maja Horst, Cian O’Donovan, Gunter Bombaerts, Meiken Hansen, Makoto Takahashi , Gianluigi Viscusi, Bozena Ryszawska 2024-02-15 2024-02-15 37 1 60 81 10.23987/sts.120246