Science & Technology Studies https://sciencetechnologystudies.journal.fi/ <div class="region region-content-intro"> <div id="block-block-6" class="block block-block"> <div class="content"> <p>Science &amp; Technology Studies is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the advancement of scholarly studies of science and technology as socio-material phenomena, including their historical and contemporary production and their associated forms of knowledge, expertise, social organization and controversy. This includes interest in developing Science and Technology Studies' own knowledge production techniques, methodology and interventions. The journal welcomes high quality contributions to that are based on substantial theoretical or empirical engagement with the multidisciplinary field of science and technology studies, including contributions from anthropology, sociology, history, philosophy, political science, educational science and communication studies.</p> <p>Science &amp; Technology Studies is the official journal of the European Association for the Study of Science and Technology (EASST) and the Finnish Association for Science and Technology Studies.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> </div> </div> </div> en-US <p><strong>Terms &amp; Conditions</strong></p> <p>This Science &amp; Technology Studies website ("Site") is owned and operated by <em>The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies</em> (“Society”). <em>The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies</em> and its publication <em>Science &amp; Technology Studies</em> are non-profit organizations.</p> <p>By accessing or using the Site, you agree to be bound by the terms and conditions below ("Terms and Conditions"). These Terms and Conditions incorporate by reference and include the Site's Privacy Policy and any guidelines, rules or disclaimers that may be posted and updated on specific web pages or on notices that are sent to you. If you do not agree with these Terms and Conditions, please do not use this Site.</p> <p>The Society reserves the right to change, modify, add or remove portions of these Terms and Conditions at its discretion at any time and without prior notice. Please check this page periodically for any modifications. Your continued use of this Site following the posting of any changes will mean that you have accepted the changes.</p> <p><strong>Copyrights and Limitations on Use</strong></p> <p>Content on this website is protected by Creative Commons license <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CC BY 4.0</a>.&nbsp; The copyright of articles remains with the authors but the license permits other users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the published articles. Using and sharing the content is permitted as long as original materials are appropriately credited. Metadata (e.g. the article title) is an exeption - this is licensed under <a href="https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/cc0/">CC0</a> that permits the distribution of the article information - not content - in archives and databases.&nbsp;</p> <p>The Site may contain robot exclusion headers, and by using the Site you agree that you will not use any robots, spiders, crawlers or other automated downloading programs or devices to access, search, index, monitor or copy any Content. The harvesting of postal or email addresses from the Site for purposes of sending unsolicited or unauthorized commercial material, is prohibited.&nbsp;</p> <p>You may not use the services on the Site to publish or distribute any information (including software or other content) that is illegal; violates or infringes upon the rights of any other person; is abusive, hateful, profane, pornographic, threatening or vulgar; contains errors, viruses or other harmful components; or is otherwise actionable by law. Science &amp; Technology Studies may at any time exercise editorial control over the content of any information or material that is submitted or distributed through its facilities and/or services.</p> <p>You may not, without the approval of Science &amp; Technology Studies, use the Site to publish or distribute any advertising, promotional material, or solicitation to other users of the Site to use any goods or services. For example (but without limitation), you may not use the Site to conduct any business, to solicit the performance of any activity that is prohibited by law, or to solicit other users to become subscribers of other information services. Similarly, you may not use the Site to download and redistribute public information or shareware for personal gain or use the facilities and/or services to distribute multiple copies of public domain information or shareware.</p> <p><strong>Trademarks</strong></p> <p>All trademarks appearing on this Site are the property of their respective owners.</p> <p><strong>Links to Other Sites</strong></p> <p>The Site may contain hyperlinks to other sites or resources that are provided solely for your convenience. Science &amp; Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability of external sites or resources linked to the Site, and does not endorse and is not responsible or liable for any content, advertising, products or other materials on or available from such sites or resources. Transactions that occur between you and any third party are strictly between you and the third party and are not the responsibility of Science &amp; Technology Studies. Due to the fact that Science &amp; Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability or accuracy of these outside resources or their contents, you should review the terms and conditions and privacy policies of these linked sites, as their policies may differ from ours.</p> <p>Last revised: 3 Aug 2020</p> antti.silvast@lut.fi (Antti Silvast) antti.silvast@gmail.com (Antti Silvast) Sun, 15 Sep 2024 11:06:52 +0300 OJS 3.2.1.4 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Gender Segregation in the Borderlands of E-Science https://sciencetechnologystudies.journal.fi/article/view/122528 <p>This article draws on an ethnographic study of an e-science platform in Sweden to analyse how horizontal gender segregation across sciences plays out in e-science, a borderland in which sciences converge around state-of-the art computational technologies for scientific research. While the convergence of sciences in e-science has the potential to open a non-traditional trajectory to attract women to ICTs, we find that this potential remains untapped. Instead horizontal gender segregation is perpetuated through a) restricted mobility of women from scientific fields with higher gender parity to IT, b) gender friction negatively affecting women in cross-disciplinary e-science, c) a gendered developer/user divide permeating e-science collaborations under ‘the logic of domains,’ and d) perceived self-reliance in computational tool development across sciences acting as ‘gendered boundary work’ to strengthen the gendered hard/soft divide in sciences.</p> Öznur Karakaş, Gabriele Griffin Copyright (c) 2023 Oznur Karakas, Gabriele Griffin https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://sciencetechnologystudies.journal.fi/article/view/122528 Sun, 15 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0300 Back to the Present of Automated Mobility https://sciencetechnologystudies.journal.fi/article/view/122099 <p>This article focuses on how car drivers domesticate technologies of automation and the way this might inform our understanding of potential shifts to a more automated mobility system. The current literature on automated mobility has mainly addressed drivers’ roles in terms of their attitudes towards—and acceptance of—an anticipated shift to high-level driving automation. In this article, however, we take a step back from expectations around automated mobility to explore the domestication of driving assistance technologies and systems already in use. The analysis is built on qualitative interviews with drivers of private cars in Norway. Based on our findings, we develop a typology of user-technology characterisations highlighting three themes of the drivers’ use (comfort, safety, and novelty) as well as two modes of engagements (modulation and non-use). Our analysis suggests that automation is likely to be an incremental and gradual process and that its eventual application depends on the specificities of the practices that it seeks to disrupt. Moreover, we argue that the governance of automated mobility needs to be attentive to the dynamic and unpredictable roles technology will have in processes of socio-technical change. In this context, we highlight the key roles of users in shaping processes of appropriation of both new technologies and broader innovations and argue that knowledge about technology domestication provides important insights to changes towards automation in our current mobility systems.</p> Gisle Solbu, Tomas Moe Skjølsvold, Marianne Ryghaug Copyright (c) 2023 Gisle Solbu, Tomas Moe Skjølsvold, Marianne Ryghaug https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://sciencetechnologystudies.journal.fi/article/view/122099 Sun, 15 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0300 Ethical Plateaus in Danish Child Protection Services https://sciencetechnologystudies.journal.fi/article/view/126011 <p>This paper analyses how controversies shape an emerging field of AI in Danish child protection services. In a context of high controversiality, we examine how algorithmic systems evolve in conjunction with changing ethical stakes. Empirically, we report a study comprising all Danish attempts (<em>n=4</em>) to develop algorithmic models for child protection services. These attempts were never fully implemented and have been either cancelled, paused or changed significantly since their outset. Combining Fischer’s (2004) notion of ‘ethical plateaus’ with insights from valuation studies, we propose that public controversies shape how organisations enact their algorithms as ethically ‘good’. Our findings demonstrate how valuations of ethically contestable algorithms involve the very distribution of agency across humans and algorithms, i.e., how much power and agency should be delegated to algorithmic models. In the case of Danish child protection services, this moves towards reducing their agency.</p> Helene Friis Ratner, Ida Schrøder Copyright (c) 2023 Helene Friis Ratner, Ida Schrøder https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://sciencetechnologystudies.journal.fi/article/view/126011 Sun, 15 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0300 Pepper as Imposter https://sciencetechnologystudies.journal.fi/article/view/121864 <p></p> Ericka Johnson Copyright (c) 2023 Ericka Johnson https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://sciencetechnologystudies.journal.fi/article/view/121864 Sun, 15 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0300 Dutreuil Sébastien (2024) Gaïa, Terre vivante https://sciencetechnologystudies.journal.fi/article/view/145109 Jeremy Rollin Copyright (c) 2024 Jeremy Rollin https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://sciencetechnologystudies.journal.fi/article/view/145109 Sun, 15 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0300 Oreskes Naomi (2022) Science on a Mission: How Military Funding Shaped What We Do and Don't Know about the Ocean. https://sciencetechnologystudies.journal.fi/article/view/145888 Adam Tamas Tuboly Copyright (c) 2024 Adam Tamas Tuboly https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://sciencetechnologystudies.journal.fi/article/view/145888 Sun, 15 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0300