Futures Work as a Mode of Academic Engagement

Assembling Smart Energy Futures for Finland

  • Mikko Jalas Aalto University School of Arts, Design and Architecture
  • Mikko Rask
  • Tatu Marttila
  • Tero Ahonen


Strategic research indicates a problem-oriented, collaborative process of knowledge creation. Analysing a Finnish research project Smart Energy Transition and a related Delphi survey, we conceptualize strategic research as ‘futures work’ and as translations of technologies, time frames and narratives into a future vision. We ask 1) What is the role of the notion of disruption in strategic research and in the acts of translation? 2) What are the available means of articulating “disruption” in a Delphi survey? and 3) How do academics carrying out strategic research align themselves as part of actor networks? We find that the notion of disruption mediates the boundaries between science, business and policy. Moreover, plural time frames of short-term changes in actor networks and long-term speculative visions enable boundary work. Alignment between actors hinges on methodology, specific academic backgrounds and expertize, public energy discourses, national and industry interests, as well as neoliberal policy approaches that see futures as business opportunities.


Download data is not yet available.


Aarrevaara T and Dobson I R (2016) Merger Mania? The Finnish Higher Education Experience. In: Pinheiro, Geschwind & Aarrevaara (eds.) Mergers in Higher Education – The Experience from Northern Europe. Higher Education Dynamics, Vol.46. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. sivunumerot puuttuu.

Aarrevaara, T. (2015). The Academic Profession in Finland: Coping with Academic Duties and Societal Challenges. In Olson, J.R., Biseth, H. & Guillermo, R. (eds.): Educational Internationalisation: Academic Voices and Public Policy. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp.

Ballo, I. F. (2015). Imagining energy futures: sociotechnical imaginaries of the future smart grid in Norway. Energy Research & Social Science, 9, 9-20.

Bell, W. (2011). Foundations of futures studies: human science for a new era: values, objectivity, and the good society. London: Transaction Publishers.

Börjeson, L., Höjer, M., Dreborg, K. H., Ekvall, T., & Finnveden, G. (2006). Scenario types and techniques: towards a user's guide. Futures, 38(7), 723-739.

Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., & Van Lente, H. (2006). The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology analysis & strategic management, 18(3-4), 285-298.

Butler, C., Demski, C., Parkhill, K., Pidgeon, N., & Spence, A. (2015). Public values for energy futures: Framing, indeterminacy and policy making. Energy policy, 87, 665-672.

Callon, M. (1986a). The sociology of an actor-network: The case of the electric vehicle. In: Callon, M., Rip, A., & Law, J. (Eds). (1986). Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world, pp. 19-34. Springer.

Callon, M. (1986b). Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In: Law, J.(ed.) Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge. pp. 196-223. London: Routledge.

Calvert, J. (2006). What's special about basic research? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 31(2), 199-220.

Edenhofer, O., & Kowarsch, M. (2015). Cartography of pathways: A new model for environmental policy assessments. Environmental Science & Policy, 51, 56-64.

Engels, F. & Münch, A. V. (2015). The micro smart grid as a materialised imaginary within the German energy transition. Energy Research and Social Science, 9, 35–42

Etzkowitz, H. (2011). Normative change in science and the birth of the Triple Helix. Social Science Information, 50(3-4), 549-568.

Felt, U. (2015). Keeping technologies out: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the formation of Austria's technopolitical identity. In: Sheila Jasanoff & Sang-Hyun Kim Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power, 103-125. University of Chicago Press.

Ferrari, A., & Lösch, A. (2017) How Smart Grid Meets In Vitro Meat: on Visions as Socio-Epistemic Practices. NanoEthics, 1-17. doi:10.1007/s11569-017-0282-9

Freeman, R. (2017). Europe in translation: Governance, integration, and the project. In: Berger, T., & Esguerra, A. (Eds). World Politics in Translation: Power, Relationality and Difference in Global Cooperation. Routledge.

Geels, F. W., & Smit, W. A. (2000). Failed technology futures: pitfalls and lessons from a historical survey. Futures, 32(9), 867-885.

Gordon, T. J. (2000). THE DELPHI METHOD. In: Glenn, J. C., & Gordon, T. J. (2000). Futures Research Methodology V2.0. Tokyo, Japan: United Nations University.

Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of advanced nursing, 32(4), 1008-1015.

Hoppe, R. (2005). Rethinking the science-policy nexus: from knowledge utilization and science technology studies to types of boundary arrangements. Poiesis & Praxis, 3(3), 199-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/FS-11-2013-0062

Jasanoff, S. (2009). The fifth branch: Science advisers as policymakers. Harvard University Press.

Jasanoff, S. (2015). Future Imperfect: Science, Technology and the Imaginations of Modernity. In Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S. (Eds.), Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power, pp. 1-33, University of Chicago Press.

Kropp, C., & Wagner, J. (2010). Knowledge on stage: Scientific policy advice. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(6), 812-838.

Lam, A. (2010). From 'ivory tower traditionalists' to 'entrepreneurial scientists'? Academic scientists in fuzzy university—Industry boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 40(2), 307-340.

Latour, B. (1993). The pasteurization of France. London, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Leipprand, A., Flachsland, C., & Pahle, M. (2017). Advocates or cartographers? Scientific advisors and the narratives of German energy transition. Energy Policy, 102, 222-236.

Linstone, H.A., & Turoff, M. (2010) Delphi: A brief look backward and forward. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.09.011

Masini, E. B. (1994). Why Futures Studies? London, Grey Seal Books.

Möllers, N. (2017). The Mundane Politics of 'Security Research'. Science & Technology Studies, 14-33.

Nowack, M., Endrikat, J., & Guenther, E. (2011). Review of Delphi-based scenario studies: quality and design considerations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1603-1615.

Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.

Paschen, J. A., & Ison, R. (2014). Narrative research in climate change adaptation—Exploring a complementary paradigm for research and governance. Research Policy, 43(6), 1083-1092.

Rikkonen, P., & Tapio, P. (2009). Future prospects of alternative agro-based bioenergy use in Finland—constructing scenarios with quantitative and qualitative Delphi data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(7), 978-990.

Rip, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems and the advent of strategic science. Journal of Technology Transfer 27, 123-131.

Rip, A. (2004). Strategic research, post-modern universities and research training. Higher Education Policy, 17(2), 153-166.

Robinson, J. B. (1982). Energy backcasting A proposed method of policy analysis. Energy policy, 10(4), 337-344.

Turoff, M. (1970). The design of a policy Delphi. Technological forecasting and social change, 2(2), 149-171.

Zehner, O. (2014). Conjuring clean energy: exposing green assumptions in media and academia. Foresight, 16(6), 567 – 585.