Futures Work as a Mode of Academic Engagement
Assembling Smart Energy Futures for Finland
Strategic research indicates a problem-oriented, collaborative process of knowledge creation. Analysing a Finnish research project Smart Energy Transition and a related Delphi survey, we conceptualize strategic research as ‘futures work’ and as translations of technologies, time frames and narratives into a future vision. We ask 1) What is the role of the notion of disruption in strategic research and in the acts of translation? 2) What are the available means of articulating “disruption” in a Delphi survey? and 3) How do academics carrying out strategic research align themselves as part of actor networks? We find that the notion of disruption mediates the boundaries between science, business and policy. Moreover, plural time frames of short-term changes in actor networks and long-term speculative visions enable boundary work. Alignment between actors hinges on methodology, specific academic backgrounds and expertize, public energy discourses, national and industry interests, as well as neoliberal policy approaches that see futures as business opportunities.
Aarrevaara, T. (2015). The Academic Profession in Finland: Coping with Academic Duties and Societal Challenges. In Olson, J.R., Biseth, H. & Guillermo, R. (eds.): Educational Internationalisation: Academic Voices and Public Policy. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp.
Ballo, I. F. (2015). Imagining energy futures: sociotechnical imaginaries of the future smart grid in Norway. Energy Research & Social Science, 9, 9-20.
Bell, W. (2011). Foundations of futures studies: human science for a new era: values, objectivity, and the good society. London: Transaction Publishers.
Börjeson, L., Höjer, M., Dreborg, K. H., Ekvall, T., & Finnveden, G. (2006). Scenario types and techniques: towards a user's guide. Futures, 38(7), 723-739.
Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., & Van Lente, H. (2006). The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology analysis & strategic management, 18(3-4), 285-298.
Butler, C., Demski, C., Parkhill, K., Pidgeon, N., & Spence, A. (2015). Public values for energy futures: Framing, indeterminacy and policy making. Energy policy, 87, 665-672.
Callon, M. (1986a). The sociology of an actor-network: The case of the electric vehicle. In: Callon, M., Rip, A., & Law, J. (Eds). (1986). Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world, pp. 19-34. Springer.
Callon, M. (1986b). Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In: Law, J.(ed.) Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge. pp. 196-223. London: Routledge.
Calvert, J. (2006). What's special about basic research? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 31(2), 199-220.
Edenhofer, O., & Kowarsch, M. (2015). Cartography of pathways: A new model for environmental policy assessments. Environmental Science & Policy, 51, 56-64.
Engels, F. & Münch, A. V. (2015). The micro smart grid as a materialised imaginary within the German energy transition. Energy Research and Social Science, 9, 35–42
Etzkowitz, H. (2011). Normative change in science and the birth of the Triple Helix. Social Science Information, 50(3-4), 549-568.
Felt, U. (2015). Keeping technologies out: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the formation of Austria's technopolitical identity. In: Sheila Jasanoff & Sang-Hyun Kim Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power, 103-125. University of Chicago Press.
Ferrari, A., & Lösch, A. (2017) How Smart Grid Meets In Vitro Meat: on Visions as Socio-Epistemic Practices. NanoEthics, 1-17. doi:10.1007/s11569-017-0282-9
Freeman, R. (2017). Europe in translation: Governance, integration, and the project. In: Berger, T., & Esguerra, A. (Eds). World Politics in Translation: Power, Relationality and Difference in Global Cooperation. Routledge.
Geels, F. W., & Smit, W. A. (2000). Failed technology futures: pitfalls and lessons from a historical survey. Futures, 32(9), 867-885.
Gordon, T. J. (2000). THE DELPHI METHOD. In: Glenn, J. C., & Gordon, T. J. (2000). Futures Research Methodology V2.0. Tokyo, Japan: United Nations University.
Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of advanced nursing, 32(4), 1008-1015.
Hoppe, R. (2005). Rethinking the science-policy nexus: from knowledge utilization and science technology studies to types of boundary arrangements. Poiesis & Praxis, 3(3), 199-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/FS-11-2013-0062
Jasanoff, S. (2009). The fifth branch: Science advisers as policymakers. Harvard University Press.
Jasanoff, S. (2015). Future Imperfect: Science, Technology and the Imaginations of Modernity. In Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S. (Eds.), Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power, pp. 1-33, University of Chicago Press.
Kropp, C., & Wagner, J. (2010). Knowledge on stage: Scientific policy advice. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(6), 812-838.
Lam, A. (2010). From 'ivory tower traditionalists' to 'entrepreneurial scientists'? Academic scientists in fuzzy university—Industry boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 40(2), 307-340.
Latour, B. (1993). The pasteurization of France. London, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Leipprand, A., Flachsland, C., & Pahle, M. (2017). Advocates or cartographers? Scientific advisors and the narratives of German energy transition. Energy Policy, 102, 222-236.
Linstone, H.A., & Turoff, M. (2010) Delphi: A brief look backward and forward. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.09.011
Masini, E. B. (1994). Why Futures Studies? London, Grey Seal Books.
Möllers, N. (2017). The Mundane Politics of 'Security Research'. Science & Technology Studies, 14-33.
Nowack, M., Endrikat, J., & Guenther, E. (2011). Review of Delphi-based scenario studies: quality and design considerations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1603-1615.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.
Paschen, J. A., & Ison, R. (2014). Narrative research in climate change adaptation—Exploring a complementary paradigm for research and governance. Research Policy, 43(6), 1083-1092.
Rikkonen, P., & Tapio, P. (2009). Future prospects of alternative agro-based bioenergy use in Finland—constructing scenarios with quantitative and qualitative Delphi data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(7), 978-990.
Rip, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems and the advent of strategic science. Journal of Technology Transfer 27, 123-131.
Rip, A. (2004). Strategic research, post-modern universities and research training. Higher Education Policy, 17(2), 153-166.
Robinson, J. B. (1982). Energy backcasting A proposed method of policy analysis. Energy policy, 10(4), 337-344.
Turoff, M. (1970). The design of a policy Delphi. Technological forecasting and social change, 2(2), 149-171.
Zehner, O. (2014). Conjuring clean energy: exposing green assumptions in media and academia. Foresight, 16(6), 567 – 585.
This Science & Technology Studies website ("Site") is owned and operated by The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies (“Society”), PO Box 117, c/o Otto Auranen, Sepänkatu 4-8 A 16, 33230 Tampere,Finland. The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies and its publication Science & Technology Studies are non-profit organizations.
The Society reserves the right to change, modify, add or remove portions of these Terms and Conditions at its discretion at any time and without prior notice. Please check this page periodically for any modifications. Your continued use of this Site following the posting of any changes will mean that you have accepted the changes.Copyrights and Limitations on Use
All content in this Site, including site layout, design, images, text and other information (collectively, the "Content") is the property of The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies/Science & Technology Studies and is protected by copyright and other intellectual property laws, unless otherwise noted.
You may not copy, display, distribute, modify, publish, reproduce, store, transmit, create derivative works from, or sell or license all or any part of the Content, products or services obtained from this Site in any medium to anyone, except as otherwise expressly permitted under applicable law or as described in these Terms and Conditions or relevant license or subscriber agreement.
You may print or download Content from the Site for academic, your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices. You may not engage in systematic retrieval of Content from the Site to create or compile, directly or indirectly, a collection, compilation, database or directory without prior written permission from Science & Technology Studies.
The Site may contain robot exclusion headers, and by using the Site you agree that you will not use any robots, spiders, crawlers or other automated downloading programs or devices to access, search, index, monitor or copy any Content. The harvesting of postal or email addresses from the Site for purposes of sending unsolicited or unauthorized commercial material, is prohibited. Any questions about whether a particular use is authorized and any requests for permission to publish, reproduce, distribute, display or make derivative works from any Content should be directed to the Science & Technology Studies Assistant Editor.
You may not use the services on the Site to publish or distribute any information (including software or other content) that is illegal; violates or infringes upon the rights of any other person; is abusive, hateful, profane, pornographic, threatening or vulgar; contains errors, viruses or other harmful components; or is otherwise actionable by law. Science & Technology Studies may at any time exercise editorial control over the content of any information or material that is submitted or distributed through its facilities and/or services.
You may not, without the approval of Science & Technology Studies, use the Site to publish or distribute any advertising, promotional material, or solicitation to other users of the Site to use any goods or services. For example (but without limitation), you may not use the Site to conduct any business, to solicit the performance of any activity that is prohibited by law, or to solicit other users to become subscribers of other information services. Similarly, you may not use the Site to download and redistribute public information or shareware for personal gain or use the facilities and/or services to distribute multiple copies of public domain information or shareware.Trademarks
All trademarks appearing on this Site are the property of their respective owners.Links to Other Sites
The Site may contain hyperlinks to other sites or resources that are provided solely for your convenience. Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability of external sites or resources linked to the Site, and does not endorse and is not responsible or liable for any content, advertising, products or other materials on or available from such sites or resources. Transactions that occur between you and any third party are strictly between you and the third party and are not the responsibility of Science & Technology Studies. Due to the fact that Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability or accuracy of these outside resources or their contents, you should review the terms and conditions and privacy policies of these linked sites, as their policies may differ from ours.
Last revised: 10 October 2012