Method Matters in the Social Study of Technology: Investigating the Biographies of Artifacts and Practices
Science and Technology Studies understandings of technological change are at odds with its own dominant research designs and methodological guidelines. A key insight from the social shaping of technology research, for instance, has been that new technologies are formed in multiple interlinked settings, by many different groups of actors over long periods of time. Nonetheless, common research designs have not kept pace with these conceptual advances, continuing instead to resort to either intensive localised ethnographic engagements or extensive historical studies, both of which can generate only partial and limited accounts of the processes they suggest are at playThere has, however, been increasing interest in extending current methodological and analytical approaches through longitudinal and multi-site research templates, which include the emerging ‘biographies of artifacts and practices’ (BOAP) framework. Since its onset in the 1990s, there are now numerous exemplifications of the BOAP approach. This paper outlines its basic rationale and principles, and its significant variations, and discusses its contribution to STS understandings of innovation, especially user-led innovation. We finish by arguing that if STS is to continue to provide insight around innovation this will require a reconceptualisation of research design, to move from simple ‘snap shot’ studies to the linking together of ‘a string of investigations’.
Akrich, M., and B. Latour. 1992. A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies. In J. Law and Bijker, W (1992).
Akrich, M. 1995. "User Representations: Practices, Methods and Sociology." In, Managing technology in society edited by Arie Rip, Thomas. J Misa, and Johan Schot, 167–84. London: Cassel Publishers.
Baldwin, Carliss, and Eric von Hippel. 2011. "Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation." Organization Science 22 (6): 1399–1417.
Bijker, W. E. 1995. Of bicycles, bakelite, and bulbs: toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bijker, W. E., T. P. Hughes, and T. J. Pinch, eds. 1987. The Social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Botero, 2013. Expanding design spaces. Helsinki: Aalto University Press.
Botero, A. & Hyysalo, S (2013). Ageing together: Steps towards evolutionary co-design in everyday practices, CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 9:1, 37-54.
Bowker, Geoffrey C, and Susan Leigh Star. 1999. Sorting Things out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brady, T., Tierney, M. and Williams, R. (1992) 'The commodification of industry-application software'. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 489-514.
Burawoy, M. (1998). The extended case method. Sociological theory, 16(1), 4-33.
Buscher, M, M Christensen, K Hansen, Preben Mogensen, and Dan Shapiro. 2009. "Bottom-Up, Top-down? Connecting Software Architecture Design with Use." In, edited by A Voss, M Hartswood, R Procter, M Rouncefield, R S Slack, and M Büscher, 157–92. London, UK: Springer.
Callon, M. 1991. Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In A Sociology of monsters : essays on power, technology, and domination, edited by J. Law. London: Routledge.
Callon, M., C. Méadel, and V. Rabeharisoa. 2002. The economy of qualities. Economy and Society 31 (2):194–217.
Cambrosio, A. & Keating, P. 1995. Exquisite specificity. MIT press
Campagnolo, Gian Marco and Giolo Fele (2010), 'From specifications to specific vagueness: how enterprise software mediates relations in engineering practices' Engineering Studies Vol. 2, Iss. 3, Cole, M. 1996. Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Cornford, J., & Pollock, N. 2003. Putting the University Online: Information, Technology and Organizational Change. Routledge.
Denzin, N. K. 1989. The Research Act. A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
DeSanctis, Gerardine, and Marshall Scott Poole. 1994. "Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory." Organization Science 5 (2): 121–147.
Edwards, P. N. (2010). A vast machine: Computer models, climate data, and the politics of global warming. MIT Press.
Engeström, Y. 1987. Learning by Expanding. An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
Engeström, Y. 2000. Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics 43 (7):960-974.
Fischer, Gerhard. 2009. "End-User Development and Meta-Design: Foundations for Cultures of Participation." In End-User Development, 3–14. Springer. Available at: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-00427-8_1 (accessed date here).
Fischer, Gerhard, and Elisa Giaccardi. 2006. "Meta-Design: A Framework for the Future of End-User Development." In End User Development, 427–457. Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/1-4020-5386-X_19.
Fleck, J. 1988. Innofusion or diffusation? The nature of technological development in robotics. Edinburg PICT Working Paper 4.
Fleck, J. 1993. Configurations : crystallizing contingency. International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing 3 (1):15-36.
Fleck, J. 1994. Learning by trying : the implementation of configurational technology. Research Policy 23:637-52.
Freeman, C. 1979. The Determinants of Innovation - Market Demand, Technology, and the Response to Social Problems. Futures 11 (3):206-215.
Freeman, S. 2015. "Immersed In Pellet Technology: Motivation Paths of Innovative DIYers." Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 16 (1): 54–80.
Fujimura, J. 1996 Crafting Science: A Sociohistory of the quest for the genetics of cancer. Harward University Press. Cambridge: MA.
Galison, P. 1997. Image and logic: A material culture of microphysiscs. Univ. Chicago Press. Chicago.
Geels, Frank W., Florian Kern, Gerhard Fuchs, Nele Hinderer, Gregor Kungl, Josephine Mylan, Mario Neukirch, and Sandra Wassermann. 2016. "The Enactment of Socio-Technical Transition Pathways: A Reformulated Typology and a Comparative Multi-Level Analysis of the German and UK Low-Carbon Electricity Transitions (1990–2014)." Research Policy 45 (4): 896–913. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.015.
Geels, F. W. & Schot J. (2007). "Typology of Sociotechnical Transition Pathways." Research Policy 36: 399–417.
Glaser, Barney, and Anselm Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
Golinski, J. 1998. Making natural knowledge: Constructivism and the history of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grimm, Christine (2008), Ethnographic Study of a Global Software Package Producer', unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh Business School, Edinburgh.
Grimm, Christine (2012), Inside a Secret Software Laboratory: An Ethnographic Study of a Global Software Package Producer, Springer Gabler.
Guerrero, Javier (2016), Maritime interdiction in the war on drugs in Columbia: practices, technologies and technological innovation (a.k.a. narco-subs) unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Social and Political Science, University of, Edinburgh: Edinburgh.
Hakkarainen, L & Hyysalo, S (2013) How Do We Keep the Living Laboratory Alive? Learning and Conflicts in Living Lab Collaboration. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6 December, 16-23.
Hakkarainen, L. & Hyysalo, S. (2016) The Evolution of Intermediary Activities: Broadening the Concept of Facilitation in Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review. 6 (1) 45-58.
Hanseth, Ole, and Bendik Bygstad. "Flexible generification: ICT standardization strategies and service innovation in health care." European Journal of Information Systems 24, no. 6 (2015): 645-663.
Hartswood, M., R. Procter, R. Slack, A. Voß, M. Buscher, M. Rouncefield, and P. Rouchy. 2002. Co-realisation: Towards a Principled Synthesis of Ethnomethodology and Participatory Design. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14 (2):9-30.
Hasu, M. 2000. Constructing clinical use: An activity-theoretical perspective on implementing new technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 12:369-382.
Hasu, M. 2001a. Critical Transition From Developers to Users. Academic Dissertation. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Education.
Hasu, M. 2005. In search of sensitive ethnography of change: Tracing the invisible hand-offs from technology developers to users. Mind, Culture, and Activity 12 (2):90–112.
Hasu, M., and Y. Engeström. 2000. Measurement in action: An activity-theoretical perspective on producer-user interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 53 (1):61-89.
Heiskanen, E., Hyysalo, S., Kotro, T., & Repo, P. (2010). Constructing innovative users and user-inclusive innovation communities. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22 (4) 495 — 511.
Helgesson, C.-F., and H. Kjellberg. 2006. Macro-Actors and the sounds of the Silenced. In Actor Network Theory and Organizing, edited by B. Czarniawska and T. Hernes. Malmö: Elanders Berlings.
Helminen, P., Mäkinen, S. & Hyysalo, S. (2016 forthcoming) Organizational adoption of the lead user method: A follow-up study. International Journal of Business Excellence.
Hennion, A. 1989. An Intermediary between Production and Consumption: The Producer of Popular Music Science, Technology, & Human Values 14 (4):400-424.
Hine, Christine (2007), 'Multi-sited Ethnography as a Middle Range Methodology for Contemporary STS', Science, Technology, & Human Values Volume 32 Number 6 November 652–671.
Howcroft, D., & Light, B. (2006). Reflections on issues of power in packaged software selection. Information Systems Journal, 16(3), 215-235.
Höyssä, M & Hyysalo, S (2009) The fog of innovation: Innovativeness and deviance in developing new clinical testing equipment. Research Policy (5) 984-993.
Hutchins, E. 1995. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Hyppönen, H. 2004. Tekniikka kehittyy, kehittyvätkö palvelut? Tapaustutkimus kotipalvelujen kehittymisestä teknologiahankkeessa. (Technology develops, do the services develop? A case study about the development of home-care services in a technology project). Helsinki: STAKES, the Finnish Center for Research and Development of Welfare and Health.
Hyppönen, H. 2007. eHealth Services and Technology: Challenges for Co-Development. Human Technology: An interdisciplinary journal on Humans in ICT environments 3 (2):188–213.
Hyysalo, S (2010). Health Technology Development and Use: From Practice Bound Imagination to Evolving Impacts. London: Routledge.
Hyysalo, S & Hakkarainen, L. (2014) What difference does a living lab make? Comparison of two health technology innovation projects. CoDesign 10 (3-4), 191-208.
Hyysalo, S & Johnson, M (2015) The User as Relational Entity: Options that Deeper Insight into User Representations Opens for Human-Centered Design. Information Technology & People 28 (1) 72 – 89.
Hyysalo, S, Kohtala, C, Helminen, P, Mäkinen, S, Miettinen, V & Muurinen, L. (2014) Collaborative futuring with and by makers. CoDesign 10 (3-4), 209-228.
Hyysalo, S., Juntunen, J. & Freeman, S (2013). Internet Forums and the Rise of the Inventive Energy User. Science & Technology Studies, 26 (1), 25-51.
Hyysalo, S., Juntunen, J. & Freeman, S (2013). User innovation in sustainable home energy technologies. Energy Policy 55 (2013) 490–500
Hyysalo, S. (2000). Yhteistyö ja ajallisuus pet-merkkiaineiden tuotekehityksessä Turku: Turun yliopiston historian laitos, 54. (Collaboration and temporality in development of pet-tracers)
Hyysalo, S. (2004). 'Technology Nurtured – Collectives in maintaining and implementing technology for elderly care'. Science Studies 12(2) 23-43.
Hyysalo, S. (2005). Objects and motives in a product design process. Mind, Culture, and Activity 12 (1), 19-36.
Hyysalo, S. (2006). Practice bound imaginaries in automating the safety of the elderly. Social Studies of Science 36(4) 599-626.
Hyysalo, S. (2006). The role of learning-by-using in the design of healthcare technologies: A case study. The Information Society 22 (2) 89-100.
Hyysalo, S. (2007). Versions of care technology. Human Technology, an international journal on humans in ICT environments, 3(2), 228-247.
Hyysalo, S. (2009) User innovation and everyday practices: Micro-innovation in sports industry development. R&D Management 39 (3) 247-258.
Hyysalo, S. (2009). Learning for learning economy and social learning. Research Policy 38 (4), 726-735.
Hyysalo, S. Elgaard Jenssen, T. & Oudshoorn, N (2016) The New Production of Users: Changing innovation collectives and involvement strategies. New York: Routledge
Hyysalo, S. Johnson, M., Juntunen, J. Forthcoming. Diffusion of consumer innovations in small scale renewable energy technologies. Journal of cleaner production.
Hyysalo, S., & Lehenkari, J. (2002). Contextualizing power in collaborative design. In T. Binder, J. Gregory & I. Wagner (Eds.), PDC 2002 (pp. 93-104). Malmö, Sweden: Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility.
Hyysalo, S., & Lehenkari, J. (2003). An activity-theoretical method for studying user-participation in IS-design. Methods of Information in Medicine, 42(4).
Hyysalo, S., Helminen, P., Mäkinen, S., Johnson, M. Juntunen, J. & Freeman, S (2015) Intermediate Search Elements and Method Combination in Lead-User Searches. International Journal of Innovation Management. 19 (1-37).
Hyysalo, S., Repo, P., Timonen, P. Hakkarainen, L. Heiskanen, E. (2015) Diversity and change of user driven innovation modes in companies. International Journal of Innovation Management.
Hyysalo, Sampsa (2004) Uses of Innovation. Wristcare in the Practices of Engineers and Elderly. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.
Hyysalo, Sampsa & Usenyuk, Svetlana (2015). User dominated technology era – Dynamics of dispersed peer innovation. Research policy. 44 (3), 560-576.
Johannessen, L. K., & Ellingsen, G. (2009). Integration and generification—agile software development in the healthcare market. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 18(5-6), 607-634.
Johnson, M, Mozaffar, H, Campagnolo, G. M., Hyysalo, S. and Pollock, N, Williams, R (2014). ¬¬The managed prosumer: Evolving knowledge strategies in the design of information infrastructures Information, Communication and Society. 17 (7) 795-813.
Johnson, M. S. Hyysalo, S. Mäkinen, P. Helminen, K. Savolainen, L. Hakkarainen (2014) From Recipes to Meals… and Dietary Regimes: Method Mixes as Key Emerging Topic in Human-Centred Design. ACM Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 343-352.
Johnson, M., Hyysalo., S & Tamminen, S. (2009). Virtuality of Virtual Worlds, or, what can we learn from play-acting horse-girls and marginalized developers. Symbolic Interaction. 33 (4), 603-633.
Johnson, Mikael. 2013. "How Social Media Changes User-Centred Design-Cumulative and Strategic User Involvement with Respect to Developer–User Social Distance." https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/8842.
Juntunen, J & Hyysalo, S (2015) Renewable micro-generation of heat and electricity – Review on common and missing socio-technical configurations. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 49, 857-870.
Juntunen, J. (2014). "Domestication Pathways of Small-Scale Renewable Energy Technologies." Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 10 (1): 1206–1230.
Kallinikos, J. (2004) 'Farewell to Constructivism: Technology and Context-Embedded Action' in C. Avgerou, C. Ciborra and F. Land (eds) The Social Study of Information and Communication Technology: Innovation, Actors, and Contexts, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kaniadakis, A. (2006) 'The Agora of Techno – Organisational Change', unpublished PhD thesis, Research Centre for Social Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
Karadedos, T. (2003) 'The Biography of a Software Package', unpublished MSc dissertation, Research Centre for Social Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
Karasti, Helena, and Karen S. Baker. 2004. "Infrastructuring for the Long-Term: Ecological Information Management." In System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 10–pp. IEEE.
Karasti, H., Baker, K.S. & Millerand, F. (2010) Computer Supported Cooperative Work 19: 377-415.
Karasti & Blomberg, 2018 Studying Infrastructuring Ethnographically. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 1-33.
Keil, M., & Carmel, E. (1995). Customer-developer links in software development. Communications of the ACM, 38(5), 33-44.
Klein, H. K., and D. L. Kleinman. 2002. The Social Construction of Technology: Structural Considerations. Science, Technology & Human Values 27 (1):28-52.
Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1981). The microsociological challenge of macro-sociology: Toward a reconstruction of social theory and methodology. Advances in social theory and methodology, 1, 47.
Koch, C. (2005). Users? What users?-Shaping global corporations and generic users with ERP. HCI-15 TITA-CSC-MDI 2006: 1 ISSN 1653-5685 ISRN-KTH/CSC/MDI—06/01--SE May 2005, 51.
Kohtala, C & Hyysalo, S. (2015) Anticipated environmental sustainability of personal fabrication. Journal of cleaner production (99), 333-344
Kopytoff, I. 1986. The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process. In The Social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective, edited by A. Appadurai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Latour, B / Johnson, Jim. 1988. "Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: The Sociology of a Door-Closer." Social Problems, 298–310.
Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford university press.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life. Beverly Hills. Calif.: Sage.
Law, J. (2007). Making a mess with method (pp. 595-606). Sage.
Law, J., and W. E. Bijker, eds. 1992. Shaping technology / building society: studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Leonard-Barton, D. 1988. Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Research Policy 17:251-267.
Levi, G. 1988. Inheriting Power. The story of an Exorcist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Locke, J., & Lowe, A. (2007). A Biography: Fabrications in the Life of an ERP Package. Organization, 14(6), 793-814.
Lundvall, B.-Å., and A. L. Vinding. 2005. Product innovation and economic theory--user-producer interaction in the learning economy. In Product Innovation, Interactive Learning and Economic Performance, edited by J. L. Christensen. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Lynch, M. (2000). Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society, 17(3), 26-54.
Mackay, H., C. Carne, P. Beynon-Davies, and D. Tudhope. 2000. Reconfiguring the user: Using Rapid Application Development. Social Studies of Science 30 (5):737-757.
MacKenzie, D., and J. Wajcman, eds. 1999. The Social Shaping of Technology. 2nd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Marcus, George E. (1995) Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 95-117.
Mattinen, M, Nissinen, A, Hyysalo, S & Juntunen, J (2014) Energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of air-source heat pump and innovative ground-source air heat pump in cold climate. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 07/2014; DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12166.
McLaughlin, J., P. Rosen, D. Skinner, and A. Webster. 1999. Valuing technology: organisations, culture, and change. London: Routledge.
Miettinen, R. 1993. Methodological Issues of Studying Innovation Related Networks. Working papers of VTT Group for Technology Studies 4.
Miettinen, R. 1998. Object Construction and Networks in Research Work: The Case of Research on Cellulose-Degrading Enzymes. Social Studies of Science 28 (3):423-463.
Miettinen, R., and M. Hasu. 2002. Articulating User-needs in Collaborative Design. Towards Activity-Theoretical Approach. Computer Supported Collaborative Work 11:129-151.
Miettinen, R. 2002b. National Innovation System: Scientific Concept or Political Rhetoric. Helsinki: Edita.
Monteiro, E, Pollock, N., Hanseth, O. and Williams, R (2013), 'From Artifacts to Infrastructures', Computer Supported Co-operative Work. DOI 10.1007/s10606-012-9167-1. August, Volume 22, Issue 4-6, pp 575-607
Mozaffar H, Williams R, Morrison Z, Cresswell K, Bates DW, Sheikh A (2015) 'The Evolution of the Market for Commercial Computerized Physician Order Entry and Computerized Decision Support Systems for Prescribing', J Am Med Inform Assoc Sept.
Mozaffar, H., Williams, R., Cresswell, K., Morrison, Z., Slee, A. et al (2014) 'Product Diversity and Spectrum of Choice in Hospital ePrescribing Systems in England' Plos ONE 9 (4) e92516
Mozaffar, H. (2016). The Role of User Groups in Generic Enterprise Applications: How far does User Driven Innovations Travel. PhD. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.
Mozaffar, Hajar Robin Williams, Kathrin M. Cresswell, Neil Pollock, Zoe Morrison and Aziz Sheikh (2016) The challenges of implementing Packaged Hospital Electronic Prescribing and Medicine Administration Systems in UK Hospitals: Premature Purchase of Immature Solutions? in Margunn Aanestad, Miria Grisot, Ole Hanseth, Polyxeni Vassilakopoulou (eds) Information Infrastructures within European Health Care ‐ Working with the Installed Base, Springer.
Nicolini, D. 2012. Practice Theory, Work and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford university press. Oxford, UK.
Nielsen, 2016 How user assemblage matters: Constructing learning by using in the case of wind turbine technology in Denmark, 1973-1990. In Hyysalo, S. Elgaard Jenssen, T. & Oudshoorn, N The New Production of Users: Changing innovation collectives and involvement strategies. New York: Routledge: 101-125.
Oudshoorn, N., E. Rommes, and M. Stienstra. 2004. Configuring the User as Everybody: Gender and Design in Information and Communication Technologies. Science, Technology & Human Values 29 (1):30-63.
Oudshoorn. N. & Pinch, T. 2003 (eds)How Users Matter. The Co-Construction of Users and Technologies, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pipek, Volkmar and Wulf, Volker (2009) "Infrastructuring: Toward an Integrated Perspective on the Design and Use of Information Technology," Journal of the Association for Information Systems: Vol. 10: Iss. 5, Article 1.
Pollock, N & S Hyysalo (2014) The Business of Being a User: The Role of the Reference Actor in Shaping Packaged Enterprise System Acquisition and Development MIS Quarterly 38 (2), 473-496.
Pollock, N 2000 'The Virtual University as Timely and Accurate Information', Information, Communication & Society, 3, 3, pp. 349–365.
Pollock, N. and Williams, R. (2007) Technology Choice and its Performance: Towards a Sociology of Software Package Procurement, Information and Organization, Volume 17, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 131-16.
Pollock, N. & Williams, R. (2010) E-infrastructures: How Do We Know And Understand Them: Strategic Ethnography and the Biography of Artefacts, Computer Supported Co-operative Work, 19: pp. 521-56.
Pollock, N. and Williams, R., (2016), How Industry Analysts Shape the Digital Future Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Pollock, N., Williams, R., D'Adderio, L. and Grimm, C. (2009) 'Post Local Forms of Repair: The (Extended) Situation of Virtualised Technical Support' Information & Organization, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp. 253-276.
Pollock, N., Williams, R., & Procter, R. (2003). Fitting standard software packages to non-standard organizations: the 'biography' of an enterprise-wide system. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(3), 317-332.
Pozzebon, M., & Van Heck, E. (2006). Local adaptations of generic application systems: the case of Veiling Holambra in Brazil. Journal of Information Technology, 21(2), 73-85.
Regnell, B., Höst, M., och Dag, J. N., Beremark, P., & Hjelm, T. (2001). An industrial case study on distributed prioritisation in market-driven requirements engineering for packaged software. Requirements Engineering, 6(1), 51-62.
Ribes D and Polk JB (2015) Organizing for Ontological Change: The Kernel of a Research Infrastructure. Social Studies of Science 45(2): 214-241.
Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th enlarged ed. New York: Free Press.
Rosenberg, N. 1979. Perspectives on Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenberg, N. 1982. Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Russell, S 1986. The Social Construction of Artefacts: a Response to Pinch and Bijker. Social Studies of Science. 16 (331-346).
Russell, S., and R. Williams. 2002. Concepts, Spaces and Tools for Action? Exploring the Policy Potential of the Social Shaping Perspective. In Shaping Technology, Guiding Policy: Concepts, Spaces and Tools, edited by K. Sorensen and R. Williams. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Sawyer, S. (2001). A market-based perspective on information systems development. Communications of the ACM, 44(11), 97-102.
Scarbrough, H. and Robertson, M. (2009) The Role of Innovation Projects in Institutionalization: The Case of Resource Planning Systems; HICSS '09. 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, (5-8 January 2009). Available online at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4755724, sampled 4th July 2016
Schuler, D., and A. Namioka, eds. 1993. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Scott-Kemmis & Bell, 2010; The mythology of learning-by-doing in World War II airframe and ship production. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development 3 (1).
Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: everyday life and how it changes. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Silverstone, R., E. Hirsch, and D. Morley. 1992. Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of the household. In Consuming technologies: media and information in domestic spaces, edited by R. Silverstone and E. Hirsch. London: Routledge.
Sismondo, S. 2004. An introduction to science and technology studies. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Spinardi, Graham, and Rebecca Slayton. 2015. "Spinardi & Slayton: Greener Aviation Take-off (Delayed): Analysing Environmental Transitions with the Multi-Level Perspective." Science & Technology Studies 28 (1). http://ojs.tsv.fi/index.php/sts/article/view/55356.
Soh, C. and Sia, K. (2004) 'An Institutional Perspective on Sources of ERP Package–Organisation Misalignments', Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 13: 375–97.
Sorensen, K. H. 1996. Learning Technology, Constructing Culture. Sociotechnical Change as Social Learning. STS Working paper, University of Trondheim, Centre for Technology and Society 18.
Sorensen, K., and R. Williams, eds. 2002. Shaping Technology, Guiding Policy: Concepts, Spaces and Tools. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Sørensen, K.H. and Levold, N. (1992) 'Tacit Networks, Heterogeneous Engineers, and Embodied Technology', Science, Technology, and Human Values, 17, 1: 13–35
Stewart, J.K. and Williams, R. (2005) 'The wrong trousers ? : beyond the design fallacy : social learning and the user' Chapter 10, pp. 195 – 223, in D. Howcroft and E.M. Trauth (eds) Handbook of Critical Information Systems Research: Theory And Application, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Stewart, J., & Hyysalo, S. (2008). Intermediaries, Users and Social Learning in Technological Innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12(3 (Sept. 2008) ), 295–325
Strauss, A. 1978. A Social World Perspective. In Studies in Social Interaction 1, edited by N. Denzin. Greenwich: JAI Press.
Suchman, L. 1987. Plans and situatated actions. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.
Suh, Jee Hyun (2014) The co-evolution of an emerging mobile technology and mobile services: A study of the distributed governance of technological innovation through the case of WiBro in South Korea, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Science, Technology and Innovation Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
Sun, Hyojung (2016) Digital Disruption in the Recording Industry, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Science, Technology and Innovation Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
Usenyuk, S., Hyysalo, S. & Whalen, J. (2016 in press) Proximal Design. Technology and Culture.
Van de Ven, A. H., D. E. Polley, R. Garud, and S. Venkataraman. 1999. The innovation journey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van de Ven, Andrew H., and Marshall Scott Poole. 2005. "Alternative Approaches for Studying Organizational Change." Organization Studies 26 (9): 1377–1404
Von Hippel, E. 1988. The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Von Hippel, E.. 1994. "Sticky Information" and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science 40 (4):429-439.
Von Hippel, E. 2001. Innovation by User Communities: Learning from Open-Source Software. MIT Sloan Management Review 42 (4):82-86.
Von Hippel, E. 2005. Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Voss, A., M. Hartswood, R. Procter, M. Rouncefield, R. S. Slack, and M. Büscher, eds. 2009. Configuring User-Designer Relations--Interdisciplinary Perspectives. London: Springer.
Voss, A., R. Procter, R. S. Slack, M. Hartswood, R. Procter, and M. Rouncefield. 2009. Design as and for Collaboration: Making Sense of and Supporting Practical Action. In Voss et al (2009).
Vygotsky, L. 1989. Thought and Language. Newly revised and edited by Alex Kozulin. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Wang, Mei (2007) 'Cultivating the Generic Solution: The Shaping of Organizational Software Packages', unpublished doctoral dissertation, Research Centre for Social Sciences: University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
Webster, J. and R. Williams (1993) 'Mismatch and Tension: Standard Packages and Non-standard Users' in P. Quintas (ed.), Social Dimensions of Systems Engineering: People, Processes, Policies and Software Development, Ellis Horwood, pp. 179-196
Wiegel, Valeri (2016) Biographies of an innovation: an ecological analysis of a strategic technology project in the auto-industry, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Science, Technology and Innovation Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
Williams, R. and Pollock, N. (2012) "Moving Beyond the Single Site Implementation Study: How (and Why) We Should Study the Biography of Packaged Enterprise Solutions," Information Systems Research, March 2012, vol. 23 no. 1, pp. 1-21.
Williams, R., and D. Edge. 1996. The social shaping of technology. Research Policy 25 (6):865-899.
Williams, R., Stewart, J. and Slack, R. (2005) Social Learning in Technological Innovation: Experimenting with Information and Communication Technologies, Edward Elgar: Aldershot.
Williams, Robin (1997) 'Universal solutions or local contingencies? Tensions and contradictions in the mutual shaping of technology and work organisation' Chap. 8, pp. 170 - 185, in McLoughlin, I and D. Mason (eds), Innovation Organizational Change and Technology, London: International Thompson Business Press.
Williams, Robin (1997a) ' The Social Shaping of a Failed Technology: Mismatch and Tension in the Supply and Use of Computer-Aided Production Management' in C. Clausen and R. Williams (eds), The Social Shaping of Computer-Aided Production Management and Computer Integrated Manufacture, Vol. 5, ISBN 92 828 1569 2, COST A4, European Commission DGXIII, Luxembourg 1997, pp. 109 - 130.
Williams, Robin (2002), 'Introduction' Chapter 1, pp. 3 – 18 in Knut H. Sørensen and Robin Williams (eds) Shaping Technology, Guiding Policy: Concepts, Spaces and Tools, Edward Elgar: Aldershot.
Woodhouse, E.J. 1991 The Turn toward Society? Social Reconstruction of Science: Science, Technology and Human Values 16 (3): 390-404
Woolgar, S. 1991. Configuring the user: the case of usability trials. In A Sociology of monsters : essays on power, technology, and domination, edited by J. Law. London: Routledge.
This Science & Technology Studies website ("Site") is owned and operated by The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies (“Society”), PO Box 117, c/o Otto Auranen, Sepänkatu 4-8 A 16, 33230 Tampere,Finland. The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies and its publication Science & Technology Studies are non-profit organizations.
The Society reserves the right to change, modify, add or remove portions of these Terms and Conditions at its discretion at any time and without prior notice. Please check this page periodically for any modifications. Your continued use of this Site following the posting of any changes will mean that you have accepted the changes.Copyrights and Limitations on Use
All content in this Site, including site layout, design, images, text and other information (collectively, the "Content") is the property of The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies/Science & Technology Studies and is protected by copyright and other intellectual property laws, unless otherwise noted.
You may not copy, display, distribute, modify, publish, reproduce, store, transmit, create derivative works from, or sell or license all or any part of the Content, products or services obtained from this Site in any medium to anyone, except as otherwise expressly permitted under applicable law or as described in these Terms and Conditions or relevant license or subscriber agreement.
You may print or download Content from the Site for academic, your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices. You may not engage in systematic retrieval of Content from the Site to create or compile, directly or indirectly, a collection, compilation, database or directory without prior written permission from Science & Technology Studies.
The Site may contain robot exclusion headers, and by using the Site you agree that you will not use any robots, spiders, crawlers or other automated downloading programs or devices to access, search, index, monitor or copy any Content. The harvesting of postal or email addresses from the Site for purposes of sending unsolicited or unauthorized commercial material, is prohibited. Any questions about whether a particular use is authorized and any requests for permission to publish, reproduce, distribute, display or make derivative works from any Content should be directed to the Science & Technology Studies Assistant Editor.
You may not use the services on the Site to publish or distribute any information (including software or other content) that is illegal; violates or infringes upon the rights of any other person; is abusive, hateful, profane, pornographic, threatening or vulgar; contains errors, viruses or other harmful components; or is otherwise actionable by law. Science & Technology Studies may at any time exercise editorial control over the content of any information or material that is submitted or distributed through its facilities and/or services.
You may not, without the approval of Science & Technology Studies, use the Site to publish or distribute any advertising, promotional material, or solicitation to other users of the Site to use any goods or services. For example (but without limitation), you may not use the Site to conduct any business, to solicit the performance of any activity that is prohibited by law, or to solicit other users to become subscribers of other information services. Similarly, you may not use the Site to download and redistribute public information or shareware for personal gain or use the facilities and/or services to distribute multiple copies of public domain information or shareware.Trademarks
All trademarks appearing on this Site are the property of their respective owners.Links to Other Sites
The Site may contain hyperlinks to other sites or resources that are provided solely for your convenience. Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability of external sites or resources linked to the Site, and does not endorse and is not responsible or liable for any content, advertising, products or other materials on or available from such sites or resources. Transactions that occur between you and any third party are strictly between you and the third party and are not the responsibility of Science & Technology Studies. Due to the fact that Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability or accuracy of these outside resources or their contents, you should review the terms and conditions and privacy policies of these linked sites, as their policies may differ from ours.
Last revised: 10 October 2012