We Are Standing Together in Front
How Scientists and Research Groups Form Identities in the Life Sciences.
Reputation building and visibility represent pressing requirements for living and working in academia today. These demands have been key to the corporate world and are acted upon through ‘branding’ practices. ‘Branding’ has further been shown to impact on employees and workplace identities. In academia, researching identity work is especially important because of a competitive funding climate that requires research groups to resemble an outstanding image and reputation. At the same time, stable jobs are scarce, bringing forth insecure and volatile environments characterized for example by temporary limited contracts and required internationalisation in scientific careers. Based on ethnographic work in globally recognized life science departments, I explore how individual and departmental identities relate. Thereby, I propose the concept of ‘enrolling’, that conveys how a research unit acts as a ‘brand’, and show how ‘enrolling practices’ produces stability through coherence and distinctiveness in individual and collective identities. My analysis thus allows a critical reflection on academia and the re-orderings in today´s universities that create pervasive demands for living and working
Balmer JM (2001) Corporate identity, corporate branding and corporate marketing - Seeing through the fog. European Journal of Marketing 35(3/4): 248-291.
Bauman Z (2004) Identity: Conversation with Benedetto Vecchi. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Brannan MJ, Parsons E and Priola V (2015) Brands at work: the search for meaning in mundane work. Organization Studies 36(1): 29-53.
Beck U (1986) Risikogesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Bröckling U (2007) Das unternehmerische Selbst. Soziologie einer Subjektivierungsform. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Bryman A (2004) Social Research Methods. 2. edition. USA: Oxford University Press.
Callon M (1986) Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of Saint Brieuc Bay. In: Law J (ed) Power, Action and Belief: a new Sociology of Knowledge? Sociological Review Monograph. London: Routledge. pp. 196-233.
Chandler J, Barry J and Clark H (2002) Stressing academe: The wear and tear of the new public management. Human Relations 55(9): 1051-1069.
Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory. London: Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage Publications.
Collinson DL (2003) Identities and Insecurities: Selves at Work. Organization 10(3): 527-547.
Dahler-Larsen P (2012) The evaluation society. CA: Stanford University Press.
Davies SR and Horst M (2015) Crafting the group: Care in research management. Social Studies of Science 45(3): 371-393.
Delamont S and Atkinson P (2001) Doctoring uncertainty: Mastering craft knowledge. Social Studies of Science 31(1): 87-107.
Epstein S (2008) The Rise of Recruitmentology' Clinical Research, Racial Knowledge, and the Politics of Inclusion and Difference. Social Studies of Science 38(5): 801-832.
Etzkowitz H (2003) Research groups as 'quasi-firms': the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy 32: 109-121.
Felt U and Glanz M (2003) University Autonomy in Europe: Changing Paradigms in Higher Education Policy. Special Case Studies. Decision-Making Structures and Human Resources Management in Finland, France, Greece, Hungary, Italy, The Netherlands, Spain and the United Kingdom. In: Magna Charta Universitatum Observatory: Managing University Autonomy. Collective Decision Making and Human Resources Policy. Proceedings of the Seminar of the Magna Charta Observatory. Bologna: Bononia University Press.
Felt U, Sigl L and Wöhrer V (2010) Multiple Ways of Being Together Alone: A Comparative Analysis of Collective and Individual Dimensions of Academic Research in Two Epistemic Fields. Working Paper. Department of Science and Technology Studies. University of Vienna.
Felt U, Barben D, Irwin A, et al. (2013) Science in Society: caring for our futures in turbulent times. ESF policy brief. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation.
Felt U, Fochler M, Müller R and Nowotny H (2017) Re-imagining and re-legitimising the university - Where past and future imaginaries meet. In: Austrian Council for Research and Technology Development (ed) Prospects and future tasks of universities: Digitalization - internationalization - differentiation. Zürich: LIT Verlag. pp. 25.
Fochler M (2016) Beyond and between Academia and Business: How Austrian Biotechnology Researchers Describe High-tech Startup Companies as Spaces of Knowledge Production. Social Studies of Science 46(2): 259-81.
Fochler M, Felt U and Müller R (2016) Unsustainable Growth, Hyper-Competition, and Worth in Life Science Research: Narrowing Evaluative Repertoires in Doctoral and Postdoctoral Scientists' Work and Lives. Minerva 54(2): 175-200.
Fochler M and de Rijcke S (2017) Implicated in the Indicator Game? An Experimental Debate. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 3: 21-40.
Garforth L and Kerr A (2010) Let's get organised: practicing and valuing scientific work inside and outside the laboratory. Sociological Research Online 15(2): 11.
Giddens A (1991) Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Griffith BC and Mullins NC (1972) Coherent groups in scientific change:, Invisible Colleagues' May be Consistent throughout Science. Science 177(4053): 959-964.
Hackett EJ (2005) Essential Tensions: Identity, Control, and Risk in Research. Social Studies of Science 35(5): 787-826.
Hackett EJ (2014) Academic Capitalism. Science, Technology, & Human Values 39 (5): 635 - 638.
Hakala J (2009) The future of the academic calling? Junior researchers in the entrepreneurial university. Higher Education 57(2): 173.
Hammarfelt BMS and de Rijcke S (2015) Accountability in Context: Effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University. Research Evaluation 24(1): 63-77.
Hammarfelt BMS, de Rijcke S and Rushforth AD (2016) Quantified academic selves: The gamification of science through social networking services. Information Research 21(2).
Hatch MJ and Schultz M (2008) Taking brand initiative: How companies can align strategy, culture, and identity through corporate branding. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Henkel M (2005) Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment. Higher Education 49(1): 155-176.
Hornbostel S (2001) Die Hochschulen auf dem Weg in die Audit Society: über Forschung, Drittmittel, Wettbewerb und Transparenz. In: Stölting E and Schimank U (eds) Die Krise der Universitäten. Wiesbaden: Springer. pp.139-158.
Kärreman D and Rylander A (2008) Managing meaning through branding - The case of a consulting firm. Organization Studies 29(1): 103-125.
Keupp H (1994) Ambivalenzen postmoderner Identität. In: Beck U and Beck-Gersheim E (eds) Riskante Freiheiten. Individualisierung in modernen Gesellschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. pp. 336-350.
Kleinman DL and Vallas SP (2001) Science, Capitalism, and the Rise of the 'Knowledge Worker': The Changing Structure of Knowledge Production in the United States. Theory and Society 30(4): 451-492.
Knorr-Cetina K (1999) Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Kunda G (1995) Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Organization Science 6(2): 228-230.
Kunda G (2006) Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Lakoff G and Johnson M (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lam A (2010) From 'ivory tower traditionalists' to 'entrepreneurial scientists'? Academic scientists in fuzzy university-industry boundaries. Social Studies of Science 40(2): 307-340.
Latour B (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour B and Woolgar S (1979) Laboratory Life. The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, UK: Princeton University Press.
Law J (1994) Organizing Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Linková M and Stöckelová T (2012) Public Accountability and the Politicization of Science: The Peculiar Journey of Czech Research Assessment. Science and Public Policy 395: 618-29.
Lorenz-Meyer D (2012) Locating excellence and enacting locality. Science, Technology, & Human Values 37(2): 241-263.
Lorey I (2011) Governmental Precarization. Transversal Journal (8). Available at: http://eipcp.net/transversal/0811/lorey/en/ (accessed 28.01.2018).
Maasen S and Weingart P (2008) Unternehmerische Universität und neue Wissenschaftskultur. In: Matthies H and Simon D (eds) Wissenschaft unter Beobachtung. Effekte und Defekte von Evaluationen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. pp.141-160.
Michael M (1996) Inoculating gadgets against ridicule. Science as Culture 6(2): 167-193.
Mulkay M and Gilbert GN (1982) Joking apart: Some recommendations concerning the analysis of scientific culture. Social Studies of Science 12(4): 585-613.
Müller R (2014) Racing for What? Anticipation and Acceleration in the Work and Career Practices of Academic Life Science Postdocs. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 15(3).
Müller R (2014a) Postdoctoral Life Scientists and Supervision Work in the New Corporate University: A Case Study of Changes in the Cultural Norms of Science. Minerva 52(3): 329-349.
Owen-Smith J and Powell WW (2002) Standing on shifting terrain: Faculty responses to the transformation of knowledge and its uses in the life sciences. Science & Technology Studies 15(1): 3-28.
Pollner M and Emerson RM (2001) Ethnomethodology and ethnography. In: Atkinson P (ed) Handbook of ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. pp. 118-135.
Power M (1997) The audit society: Rituals of verification. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rindova V, Williamson I, Petkova A and Sever J (2005) Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Academy of Management Journal 48(6): 1033–1049.
Rodrigues S and Child J (2008) The development of corporate identity: A political perspective. Journal of Management Studies 45(5): 885-911.
Rose N (1998) Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schönbauer SM (2017) How Biologists 'Meet'. In: Jonas, M, Littig, B and Wroblewski, A (eds) Methodological Reflections on Practice Oriented Theories. Cham: Springer. pp. 221-234.
Schultz M, Hatch MJ and Larsen MH (2002) Scaling the Tower of Babel: Relational Differences between Identity, Image, and Culture in Organizations. In: Schultz M, Hatch MJ and Larsen MH (eds) The Expressive Organization: Linking Identity, Reputation, and the Corporate Brand. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 9-35.
Shapin S (2008) The Scientific Life. A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shore C (2008) Audit culture and illiberal governance: Universities and the politics of accountability. Anthropological Theory 8(3): 278–298.
Sigl L (2016) On the tacit governance of research by uncertainty. How early stage researchers contribute to the governance of life science research. Science, Technology & Human Values 41: 347-374.
Slaughter S and Leslie LL (1997) Academic capitalism. Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Slaughter S and Rhoades G (2004) Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore, Maryland: JHU Press.
Steiner L, Sundström AC and Sammalisto K (2013) An analytical model for university identity and reputation strategy work. Higher Education 65(4): 401-415.
Stöckelová T (2014) Power at the Interfaces: The Contested Orderings of Academic Presents and Futures in a Social Science Department. Higher Education Policy 27:435-451.
Sveningsson S and Alvesson M (2003) Managing Managerial Identities: Organizational Fragmentation, Discourse and Identity Struggle. Human Relation 56: 1163-1193.
TallBear K (2013) Genomic articulations of indigeneity. Social Studies of Science 43(4): 509-533.
Traweek S (1988) Beamtimes and lifetimes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Vallas SP and Cummins ER (2015) Personal branding and identity norms in the popular business press: Enterprise culture in an age of precarity. Organization Studies 36 (3): 293-319.
Vermeulen N (2017) The choreography of a new research field: Aggregation, circulation and oscillation. Environment and Planning A. 0(0): 1-21
Wæraas A and Solbakk MN (2009) Defining the essence of a university: Lessons from higher education branding. Higher Education 57(4): 449.
Watson TJ (2008) Managing identity: Identity work, personal predicaments and structural circumstances. Organization 15(1): 121-143.
Ylijoki O-H (2014) University under structural reform: A micro-level perspective. Minerva 52(1): 55-75.
This Science & Technology Studies website ("Site") is owned and operated by The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies (“Society”), PO Box 117, c/o Otto Auranen, Sepänkatu 4-8 A 16, 33230 Tampere,Finland. The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies and its publication Science & Technology Studies are non-profit organizations.
The Society reserves the right to change, modify, add or remove portions of these Terms and Conditions at its discretion at any time and without prior notice. Please check this page periodically for any modifications. Your continued use of this Site following the posting of any changes will mean that you have accepted the changes.Copyrights and Limitations on Use
All content in this Site, including site layout, design, images, text and other information (collectively, the "Content") is the property of The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies/Science & Technology Studies and is protected by copyright and other intellectual property laws, unless otherwise noted.
You may not copy, display, distribute, modify, publish, reproduce, store, transmit, create derivative works from, or sell or license all or any part of the Content, products or services obtained from this Site in any medium to anyone, except as otherwise expressly permitted under applicable law or as described in these Terms and Conditions or relevant license or subscriber agreement.
You may print or download Content from the Site for academic, your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices. You may not engage in systematic retrieval of Content from the Site to create or compile, directly or indirectly, a collection, compilation, database or directory without prior written permission from Science & Technology Studies.
The Site may contain robot exclusion headers, and by using the Site you agree that you will not use any robots, spiders, crawlers or other automated downloading programs or devices to access, search, index, monitor or copy any Content. The harvesting of postal or email addresses from the Site for purposes of sending unsolicited or unauthorized commercial material, is prohibited. Any questions about whether a particular use is authorized and any requests for permission to publish, reproduce, distribute, display or make derivative works from any Content should be directed to the Science & Technology Studies Assistant Editor.
You may not use the services on the Site to publish or distribute any information (including software or other content) that is illegal; violates or infringes upon the rights of any other person; is abusive, hateful, profane, pornographic, threatening or vulgar; contains errors, viruses or other harmful components; or is otherwise actionable by law. Science & Technology Studies may at any time exercise editorial control over the content of any information or material that is submitted or distributed through its facilities and/or services.
You may not, without the approval of Science & Technology Studies, use the Site to publish or distribute any advertising, promotional material, or solicitation to other users of the Site to use any goods or services. For example (but without limitation), you may not use the Site to conduct any business, to solicit the performance of any activity that is prohibited by law, or to solicit other users to become subscribers of other information services. Similarly, you may not use the Site to download and redistribute public information or shareware for personal gain or use the facilities and/or services to distribute multiple copies of public domain information or shareware.Trademarks
All trademarks appearing on this Site are the property of their respective owners.Links to Other Sites
The Site may contain hyperlinks to other sites or resources that are provided solely for your convenience. Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability of external sites or resources linked to the Site, and does not endorse and is not responsible or liable for any content, advertising, products or other materials on or available from such sites or resources. Transactions that occur between you and any third party are strictly between you and the third party and are not the responsibility of Science & Technology Studies. Due to the fact that Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability or accuracy of these outside resources or their contents, you should review the terms and conditions and privacy policies of these linked sites, as their policies may differ from ours.
Last revised: 10 October 2012