Citizenship in Collision

Notions of Agency in Road Safety Work

  • Beate Elvebakk University of Oslo


In 2004, the Norwegian Accident Investigation Board (AIBN), previously restricted to civil aviation, was expanded to include a new section for road traffic, which was to investigate individual road accidents. The overall ambition behind the new organisation was to reduce the number of fatalities in road traffic. This article explores the idea that the main task of the Accident Investigation Board’s section for road traffic was to construct a new kind of narrative about road accidents, which would in turn open up new possibilities for intervention. The article examines what characterizes the narratives they have constructed and how these narratives interact with conceptions of risk and causality. It also discusses how they fit into the existing structure of road safety work in Norway. It concludes that the Accident Investigation Board’s narratives are implicitly political, as they partly deconstruct the notion of liberal citizenship underlying the legal system, and that this deconstruction can potentially have far-reaching practical consequences.


Download data is not yet available.


Accident Investigation Board Norway (2008). Rapport vei, 2008/6 Rapport om kryssulykke mellom lastebil og personbil. [Report on intersection accident between lorry and passenger car].

Beckmann J (2004) Mobility and safety. Theory, culture & society, 21(4-5): 81-100.

Benediktsson MO (2015) Beyond the Sidewalk: Pedestrian Risk and Material Mismatch in the American Suburbs. Mobilities, 1-21.

Bjørnskau, Torkel (2015): Alternative forståelser av risiko og eksponering. TØI rapport 1449, Oslo.

Bowker GC, S Timmermans, and SL Star (1996) Infrastructure and organizational transformation: Classifying nurses' work. In Information technology and changes in organizational work. Springer US: 344-370.

Braun H-J (1992) The Chrysler automotive gas turbine engine, 1950-80. Social Studies of Science 22(2): 339-351.

Brown, MB (2001) The civic shaping of technology: California's electric vehicle program. Science, Technology & Human Values 26(1): 56-81.

Carolan MS (2009) Ethanol versus Gasoline. The Contestation and Closure of a Socio-technical System in the USA. Social Studies of Science 39(3): 421-448.

Dant T (2004) The driver-car. Theory, Culture & Society 21(4-5): 61-79.

Dworkin G (1972) Paternalism. The Monist 56(1): 64-84.

Elvebakk B (2007) Vision zero: Remaking road safety. Mobilities 2(3): 425-441.

European Transport Safety Council (2013) Back on Track to Reach the EU 2020 Safety Target? 7th Road Safety PIN report, Brussels. Available online at

Fahlquist JN (2006) Responsibility ascriptions and vision zero. Accident Analysis & Prevention 38(6): 1113-1118.

Fedtke, J (2003) Strict Liability for Car Drivers in Accidents Involving "Bicycle Guerrillas"? Some Comments on the Proposed Fifth Motor Directive of the European Commission, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 51, 4, 941-95.

Geels FW (2007) Transformations of Large Technical Systems. A Multilevel Analysis of the Dutch Highway System (1950-2000). Science, Technology & Human Values 32(2): 123-149.

Gilligan C (1982) In a different voice Psychological theory and women's development. Harvard University Press.

Gjøen H and M Hård (2002) Cultural politics in action: Developing user scripts in relation to the electric vehicle. Science, Technology & Human Values 27(2): 262-281.

Hacking I (1990) The Taming of Chance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Higgins TE (2003) Why Feminists Can't (or Shouldn't) Be Liberals. Fordham Law Rev. 72: 1629.

Hilgartner S (1992) The social construction of risk objects: Or, how to pry open networks of risk. Organizations, uncertainties, and risk: 39-53.

Hommels A (2005) Studying obduracy in the city: Toward a productive fusion between technology studies and urban studies. Science, Technology & Human Values 30(3): 323-351.

Hopkins A (2014) Issues in safety science. Safety Science 67: 6-14.

Hvattum M et al. (eds.) (2011). Routes, Roads and Landscapes. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.

Jain SSL (2004) "Dangerous instrumentality": the bystander as subject in automobility. Cultural Anthropology 19(1): 61-94.

Kymlicka W (2001) Contemporary political philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Law J and A Mol (2002) Local entanglements and utopian moves: an inquiry into train accidents. The Sociological Review 50(1): 82-105.

Law J and V Singleton (2000) Performing technology's stories: On social constructivism, performance, and performativity. Technology and Culture 41(4): 765-775.

McAndrews C Road Safety as a Shared Responsibility and a Public Problem in Swedish Road Safety Policy. Science, Technology & Human Values 38(3): 749-772.

McClain LC (1991) Atomistic Man Revisited: Liberalism, Connection, and Feminist Jurisprudence. Southern California. Law Review. 65: 1171.

Mill JS (1999) On Liberty. Broadview Press.

Ministry of Transport and Communications (2002) Forslag fra arbeidsgruppe: Felles havarikommisjon for sivil luftfart, jernbane-, sjø- og vegtransport. [Proposal from working group: Joint accident investigation board for civil aviation, railways, marine and road transport], Oslo. Available online at

Ministry of Transport and Communications (2002): Utredning angående etablering av en felles havarikommisjon for transport [Report pertaining to the establishment of a joint accident investigation board for transport], Oslo, 2002.

Ministry of Transport and Communications (2003): Utvidelse av Havarikommisjonen til også å omfatte vegsektoren. [Expansion of the Accident Investigation Board to the road sector], Oslo. Available at

Norwegian Council for Road Safety homepage

Norwegian Road Traffic Act. Available at

Okin SM (2003) Justice and Gender: An Unfinished Debate. Fordham Law Rev. 72: 1537.

Ot.prp. no 50 (2004-2005)

Perrow C (2011) Normal accidents: Living with high risk technologies. Princeton University Press.

Ragnøy A and R Elvik (2003) Trafikksikkerhetsanalyse av stamvegnettet i Norge. TØI rapport 649, Oslo.

Randell R (2016) The microsociology of automobility: the production of the automobile self. Mobilities: 1-14.

Rawls J (1993) Political liberalism. Columbia University Press.

Sandel MJ (1998) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge University Press.

Schuck, Peter H. "Liberal citizenship." Handbook of citizenship studies (2002): 131-144.

Shalom Hakkert A. and Gitelman V (2014) Thinking about the history of road safety research: Past achievements and future challenges. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 25(0), 137-149.

Sheller M and J Urry (2000) The city and the car. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24(4): 737-757.

Star SL (2001) Distributions of power–power, technologies and the phenomenology of conventions: on being allergic to onions. In Law, J (ed.) A sociology of monsters–essays on power, technology and domination. Routledge.

St.prp. nr. 1 (2002-2003). Available at

The Norwegian Public Roads Administration Homepage

Wetmore JM (2004) Redefining risks and redistributing responsibilities: Building networks to increase automobile safety. Science, Technology & Human Values 29(3): 377-405.

White Paper no 46. (1999-2000). Nasjonal transportplan 2002-2011. Available online at

World Health Organization (2003) Global status report on road safety 2013: supporting a decade of action.
Research Papers