Magicians at Work: Modellers as Institutional Entrepreneurs in the Global Governance of Agriculture and Food Security

  • Lise Cornilleau LISIS / Paris Est University and CSO / Sciences Po

Abstract

Global models of agriculture act as the epistemic basis for quantitative foresight, which guides international policymaking and research on agriculture. With the new political sociology of science as a backdrop, this article studies the actors who develop and use these models through the lens of field theory. Contributing to the dialogue between the neo-institutionalist field theory and its Bourdieusian version, it describes the structure and the dynamics of the strategic action field of modelling organizations, using the Bourdieusian notions of “succession” and “subversion” to refine the characterization of challengers. It also discusses the insights of the Bourdieusian concept of “homology” to analyse the relations between the field of model producers and the field of model users. Whereas Bourdieu provides a primarily descriptive account of homologies, which are close to a “social magic without magicians” for Roueff, the present text describes magicians doing the work of producing homologies. Some modellers use intercomparison to reduce competition and to have their models used in the field of global governance, thus strategically producing homologies, while resolving the main modelling conflict of the field. These actors benefit from the recent change in the modelling field under the influence of climate change, to behave as what Fligstein and McAdam have called “institutional entrepreneurs”. The article concludes that this amended version of field theory makes it possible to describe the co-construction of a range of models developed by competing organizations and the controversial making of global agricultural governance. Doing so, it complements the co-production framework, which often focuses on a given site of expertise production and a site of global governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akera A (2007) Constructing a Representation for an Ecology of Knowledge: Methodological Advances in the Integration of Knowledge and its Various Contexts. Social Studies of Science 37(3): 413-441.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312706070742

Armatte M (2010) La science économique comme ingénierie. Quantification et modélisation. Paris: Presses de l'École des Mines.

Cornilleau L and. Joly P.-B. (2014) La Révolution Verte, un instrument de gouvernement de la "faim dans le monde". Une histoire de la recherche agronomique internationale. In: Pestre D (ed.) Le Gouvernement des technosciences. Gouverner le progrès et ses dégâts. Paris: La Découverte, pp. 171-201.

Cornilleau L (2016) La modélisation économique globale, une technologie de gouvernement à distance ? Généalogie, circulations et traductions d'un modèle de la sécurité alimentaire globale de l'IFPRI. Revue d'Anthropologie des Connaissances 10 (2): 171-196.

https://doi.org/10.3917/rac.031.0171

Aykut SC, Foyer J and Morena E (eds) (2017) Globalising the Climate: Cop21 and the Climatisation of Global Debates. London and& New York: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315560595

Berman EP (2014) Field Theories and the Move toward the Market in US Academic Science. Political Power and Social Theory 27: 193-221.

https://doi.org/10.1108/S0198-871920140000027015

Bernstein S and, Van der Ven H (2017) Best Practices in Global Governance. Review of International Studies 43(3): 534-556.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210516000425

Bezes P, Chiapello È and Desmarez P (2016) Introduction : la tension savoirs-pouvoirs à l'épreuve du gouvernement par les indicateurs de performance. Sociologie du travail 58(4): 347-369.

Bigo D (2011) Pierre Bourdieu and International Relations: Power of Practices, Practices of Power. International Political Sociology 5 (3): 225-258.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2011.00132.x

Bourdieu P (2015) Sociologie générale : Cours au Collège de France 1981-1983 (Vol. 1). Paris: Le Seuil.

Bruno I, Didier E and Prévieux J (eds.) (2014) Statactivisme. Comment lutter avec des nombres. Paris: La Découverte.

Callon M (1986) Éléments pour une sociologie de la traduction : la domestication des coquilles Saint-Jacques et des marins-pêcheurs dans la baie de Saint-Brieuc. L'Année sociologique 36: 169-208.

Dahan A (ed) (2007) Les modèles du futur. Paris: La Découverte.

Demortain D (2011) Scientists and the Regulation of Risks: Standardising Control. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849809443

Dervis K, De Melo J, and Robinson S, (1989) General equilibrium models for development policies, World Bank: Washington DC.

Desrosières A (2008) L'argument statistique. Tomes I et II. Paris: Presses des Mines.

Djelic ML and, Sahlin-Andersson K (eds.) (2006) Transnational Governance. Institutional Dynamics of Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fligstein N and, McAdam D (2012) A theory of fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199859948.001.0001

Fouilleux E (2000) Entre production et institutionnalisation des idées : la réforme de la politique agricole commune. Revue française de science politique, 50 (2): 277-305.

https://doi.org/10.3406/rfsp.2000.395468

Fouilleux E and, Loconto A (2017) Voluntary standards, certification, and accreditation in the global organic agriculture field: a tripartite model of techno-politics, Agriculture and Human Values 34: 1-14.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-016-9686-3

Fourcade M (2006). The Construction of a Global Profession: The Transnationalization of Economics. American Journal of Sociology, 112(1), pp. 145-194.

https://doi.org/10.1086/502693

Frickel S and, Moore K (2006) The New Political Sociology of Science. Institutions, Networks and Power. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.

Go J and, Krause M (2016) Fielding Transnationalism: An Introduction. The Sociological Review Monographs 64: 6-30.

https://doi.org/10.1002/2059-7932.12000

Haas PM (2017) Coupling science to governance: straddling the science-policy interface. In : Littoz-Monnet A (ed.) The politics of expertise in international organizations: how international bureaucracies produce and mobilize knowledge, Abingdom & New York: Routledge, pp.54-75.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315542386-4

Henriksen LF (2013) Economic models as devices of policy change: Policy paradigms, paradigm shift, and performativity. Regulation & Governance 7(4): 481-495.

https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12031

Hess DJ, Amir S, Frickel S, Kleinman DL, Moore K and Williams LDA (2017) Structural Inequality and the Politics of Science and Technology. In: Felt U (ed) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Fourth Edition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 319-346.

Jasanoff S (ed.) (2004) States of Knowledge: the co-production of science and the social order. London and& New York: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413845

Joly PB and Dorin B (forthcoming) Modelling World Agriculture as a Learning Machine? From mainstream models to Agribiom 1.0, Land Use Policy.

Joly PB and, Lacombe P (2017) Sciences sociales et politiques agricoles. Une analyse socio-historique des rapports savoir/pouvoir. Histoire de la recherche contemporaine VI (2) : 163-179.

Joly PB, Dorin B (forthcoming) Modelling World Agriculture as a Learning Machine? From mainstream models to Agribiom 1.0, Land Use Policy.

Kieken H (2004) RAINS : Modéliser les pollutions atmosphériques pour la négociation internationale. Revue d'histoire des sciences 57(2): 377-406.

https://doi.org/10.3406/rhs.2004.2217

Kurunmäki L, Mennicken A, and Miller P (2016) Quantifying, Economising, and Marketising : Democratising the social sphere ? Sociologie du travail 58 : 390-402.

https://doi.org/10.4000/sdt.1210

Lampe M, Willenbockel D, Ahammad H et al. (2014) Why do global long‐term scenarios for agriculture differ? An overview of the AgMIP global economic model intercomparison. Agricultural Economics 45(1): 3-20.

https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12086

Leblond N and, Trottier J (2016) Performing an Invisibility Spell: Global Models, Food Regimes and Smallholders. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture & Food 23(1): 21-40.

Martin JL (2003) What is field theory? American Journal of Sociology 109(1): 1-49.

https://doi.org/10.1086/375201

McKenzie D (2006) An Engine, Not a Camera. How Financial Models Shape Markets. London & Cambridge: The MIT Press.

https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262134606.001.0001

Merry SE (2016) The Seduction of Quantification. Measuring Human Rights, Gender Violence, and Sex Trafficking. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226261317.001.0001

Miller CA (2007) Democratization, International Knowledge Institutions, and Global Governance. Governance 20 (2): 325-357.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00359.x

Morgan MS, and Morrison M (eds.) (1999) Models as Mediators. Perspectives on Natural and Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660108

Nelson G. et al., Rosegrant, MW, Palazzo A et al. (2010) Food Security, Farming and Climate Change to 2050. Scenarios, Results, Policy Options. Washington DC: IFPRI.

Paradeise C and, Filliatreau G (2016) The Emergent Action Field of Metrics: From Rankings to Altmetrics. In: Lounsbury M, Popp Berman E and, Paradeise C (eds.) The University under Pressure. Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Research in the Sociology of Organizations , 46, pp. 87-128.

Reinecke J, Manning S and, von Hagen O (2012), The emergence of a standards market: Multiplicity of the sustainability standards in the global coffee industry. Organization Studies 33(5-6): 791-814.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612443629

Rosenzweig C, Jones JW, Hatfield JL et al. (2013) The agricultural model intercomparison and improvement project (AgMIP): protocols and pilot studies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 170: 166-182.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.011

Rottenburg R, Merry SE, Park SJ and, Mugler J (eds.) (2015) The World of Indicators. The Making of Governmental Knowledge through Quantification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Roueff O (2013) Les homologies structurales : une magie sociale sans magiciens ? La place des intermédiaires dans la fabrique des valeurs. In: Coulangeon P. and Duval J. (eds) Trente Ans Après la Distinction, de Pierre Bourdieu. Paris: La Découverte, pp.153-164.

Shackley and Wynne (1995) Global Climate Change: the Mutual Construction of an Emergent Science-Policy Domain. Science and Public Policy 22(4): 218-230.

Scoones I (2009) The politics of global assessments: the case of the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD). The Journal of Peasant Studies 36(3): 547-571.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150903155008

Sjögren E and, Helgesson CF (2007) Health economics and medicine in the shaping of Swedish markets for subsidized pharmaceuticals. In: Callon M, Millo Y and, Muniesa F (eds.) Market Devices, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 215–240.

Tomlinson I (2013) Doubling Food Production to Feed the Nine Billion: A Critical Perspective on a Key Discourse of Food Security in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies 29: 81-90.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.09.001

Winickoff DE and, Bushey (2010) Science and Power in Global Food Regulation: The Rise of the Codex Alimentarius, Science Technology & Human Values 35(3): 356-381.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243909334242

Winickoff DE and, Mondou M (2017) The problem of epistemic jurisdiction in global governance: The case of sustainability standards for biofuels, Social Studies of Science 47 (1): 7-32.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716667855

Published
2019-09-21