Magicians at Work: Modellers as Institutional Entrepreneurs in the Global Governance of Agriculture and Food Security
Global models of agriculture act as the epistemic basis for quantitative foresight, which guides international policymaking and research on agriculture. With the new political sociology of science as a backdrop, this article studies the actors who develop and use these models through the lens of field theory. Contributing to the dialogue between the neo-institutionalist field theory and its Bourdieusian version, it describes the structure and the dynamics of the strategic action field of modelling organizations, using the Bourdieusian notions of “succession” and “subversion” to refine the characterization of challengers. It also discusses the insights of the Bourdieusian concept of “homology” to analyse the relations between the field of model producers and the field of model users. Whereas Bourdieu provides a primarily descriptive account of homologies, which are close to a “social magic without magicians” for Roueff, the present text describes magicians doing the work of producing homologies. Some modellers use intercomparison to reduce competition and to have their models used in the field of global governance, thus strategically producing homologies, while resolving the main modelling conflict of the field. These actors benefit from the recent change in the modelling field under the influence of climate change, to behave as what Fligstein and McAdam have called “institutional entrepreneurs”. The article concludes that this amended version of field theory makes it possible to describe the co-construction of a range of models developed by competing organizations and the controversial making of global agricultural governance. Doing so, it complements the co-production framework, which often focuses on a given site of expertise production and a site of global governance.
Akera A (2007) Constructing a Representation for an Ecology of Knowledge: Methodological Advances in the Integration of Knowledge and its Various Contexts. Social Studies of Science 37(3): 413-441.
Armatte M (2010) La science économique comme ingénierie. Quantification et modélisation. Paris: Presses de l'École des Mines.
Cornilleau L and. Joly P.-B. (2014) La Révolution Verte, un instrument de gouvernement de la "faim dans le monde". Une histoire de la recherche agronomique internationale. In: Pestre D (ed.) Le Gouvernement des technosciences. Gouverner le progrès et ses dégâts. Paris: La Découverte, pp. 171-201.
Cornilleau L (2016) La modélisation économique globale, une technologie de gouvernement à distance ? Généalogie, circulations et traductions d'un modèle de la sécurité alimentaire globale de l'IFPRI. Revue d'Anthropologie des Connaissances 10 (2): 171-196.
Aykut SC, Foyer J and Morena E (eds) (2017) Globalising the Climate: Cop21 and the Climatisation of Global Debates. London and& New York: Routledge.
Berman EP (2014) Field Theories and the Move toward the Market in US Academic Science. Political Power and Social Theory 27: 193-221.
Bernstein S and, Van der Ven H (2017) Best Practices in Global Governance. Review of International Studies 43(3): 534-556.
Bezes P, Chiapello È and Desmarez P (2016) Introduction : la tension savoirs-pouvoirs à l'épreuve du gouvernement par les indicateurs de performance. Sociologie du travail 58(4): 347-369.
Bigo D (2011) Pierre Bourdieu and International Relations: Power of Practices, Practices of Power. International Political Sociology 5 (3): 225-258.
Bourdieu P (2015) Sociologie générale : Cours au Collège de France 1981-1983 (Vol. 1). Paris: Le Seuil.
Bruno I, Didier E and Prévieux J (eds.) (2014) Statactivisme. Comment lutter avec des nombres. Paris: La Découverte.
Callon M (1986) Éléments pour une sociologie de la traduction : la domestication des coquilles Saint-Jacques et des marins-pêcheurs dans la baie de Saint-Brieuc. L'Année sociologique 36: 169-208.
Dahan A (ed) (2007) Les modèles du futur. Paris: La Découverte.
Demortain D (2011) Scientists and the Regulation of Risks: Standardising Control. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Dervis K, De Melo J, and Robinson S, (1989) General equilibrium models for development policies, World Bank: Washington DC.
Desrosières A (2008) L'argument statistique. Tomes I et II. Paris: Presses des Mines.
Djelic ML and, Sahlin-Andersson K (eds.) (2006) Transnational Governance. Institutional Dynamics of Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fligstein N and, McAdam D (2012) A theory of fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fouilleux E (2000) Entre production et institutionnalisation des idées : la réforme de la politique agricole commune. Revue française de science politique, 50 (2): 277-305.
Fouilleux E and, Loconto A (2017) Voluntary standards, certification, and accreditation in the global organic agriculture field: a tripartite model of techno-politics, Agriculture and Human Values 34: 1-14.
Fourcade M (2006). The Construction of a Global Profession: The Transnationalization of Economics. American Journal of Sociology, 112(1), pp. 145-194.
Frickel S and, Moore K (2006) The New Political Sociology of Science. Institutions, Networks and Power. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Go J and, Krause M (2016) Fielding Transnationalism: An Introduction. The Sociological Review Monographs 64: 6-30.
Haas PM (2017) Coupling science to governance: straddling the science-policy interface. In : Littoz-Monnet A (ed.) The politics of expertise in international organizations: how international bureaucracies produce and mobilize knowledge, Abingdom & New York: Routledge, pp.54-75.
Henriksen LF (2013) Economic models as devices of policy change: Policy paradigms, paradigm shift, and performativity. Regulation & Governance 7(4): 481-495.
Hess DJ, Amir S, Frickel S, Kleinman DL, Moore K and Williams LDA (2017) Structural Inequality and the Politics of Science and Technology. In: Felt U (ed) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Fourth Edition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 319-346.
Jasanoff S (ed.) (2004) States of Knowledge: the co-production of science and the social order. London and& New York: Routledge.
Joly PB and Dorin B (forthcoming) Modelling World Agriculture as a Learning Machine? From mainstream models to Agribiom 1.0, Land Use Policy.
Joly PB and, Lacombe P (2017) Sciences sociales et politiques agricoles. Une analyse socio-historique des rapports savoir/pouvoir. Histoire de la recherche contemporaine VI (2) : 163-179.
Joly PB, Dorin B (forthcoming) Modelling World Agriculture as a Learning Machine? From mainstream models to Agribiom 1.0, Land Use Policy.
Kieken H (2004) RAINS : Modéliser les pollutions atmosphériques pour la négociation internationale. Revue d'histoire des sciences 57(2): 377-406.
Kurunmäki L, Mennicken A, and Miller P (2016) Quantifying, Economising, and Marketising : Democratising the social sphere ? Sociologie du travail 58 : 390-402.
Lampe M, Willenbockel D, Ahammad H et al. (2014) Why do global long‐term scenarios for agriculture differ? An overview of the AgMIP global economic model intercomparison. Agricultural Economics 45(1): 3-20.
Leblond N and, Trottier J (2016) Performing an Invisibility Spell: Global Models, Food Regimes and Smallholders. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture & Food 23(1): 21-40.
Martin JL (2003) What is field theory? American Journal of Sociology 109(1): 1-49.
McKenzie D (2006) An Engine, Not a Camera. How Financial Models Shape Markets. London & Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Merry SE (2016) The Seduction of Quantification. Measuring Human Rights, Gender Violence, and Sex Trafficking. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Miller CA (2007) Democratization, International Knowledge Institutions, and Global Governance. Governance 20 (2): 325-357.
Morgan MS, and Morrison M (eds.) (1999) Models as Mediators. Perspectives on Natural and Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nelson G. et al., Rosegrant, MW, Palazzo A et al. (2010) Food Security, Farming and Climate Change to 2050. Scenarios, Results, Policy Options. Washington DC: IFPRI.
Paradeise C and, Filliatreau G (2016) The Emergent Action Field of Metrics: From Rankings to Altmetrics. In: Lounsbury M, Popp Berman E and, Paradeise C (eds.) The University under Pressure. Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Research in the Sociology of Organizations , 46, pp. 87-128.
Reinecke J, Manning S and, von Hagen O (2012), The emergence of a standards market: Multiplicity of the sustainability standards in the global coffee industry. Organization Studies 33(5-6): 791-814.
Rosenzweig C, Jones JW, Hatfield JL et al. (2013) The agricultural model intercomparison and improvement project (AgMIP): protocols and pilot studies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 170: 166-182.
Rottenburg R, Merry SE, Park SJ and, Mugler J (eds.) (2015) The World of Indicators. The Making of Governmental Knowledge through Quantification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roueff O (2013) Les homologies structurales : une magie sociale sans magiciens ? La place des intermédiaires dans la fabrique des valeurs. In: Coulangeon P. and Duval J. (eds) Trente Ans Après la Distinction, de Pierre Bourdieu. Paris: La Découverte, pp.153-164.
Shackley and Wynne (1995) Global Climate Change: the Mutual Construction of an Emergent Science-Policy Domain. Science and Public Policy 22(4): 218-230.
Scoones I (2009) The politics of global assessments: the case of the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD). The Journal of Peasant Studies 36(3): 547-571.
Sjögren E and, Helgesson CF (2007) Health economics and medicine in the shaping of Swedish markets for subsidized pharmaceuticals. In: Callon M, Millo Y and, Muniesa F (eds.) Market Devices, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 215–240.
Tomlinson I (2013) Doubling Food Production to Feed the Nine Billion: A Critical Perspective on a Key Discourse of Food Security in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies 29: 81-90.
Winickoff DE and, Bushey (2010) Science and Power in Global Food Regulation: The Rise of the Codex Alimentarius, Science Technology & Human Values 35(3): 356-381.
Winickoff DE and, Mondou M (2017) The problem of epistemic jurisdiction in global governance: The case of sustainability standards for biofuels, Social Studies of Science 47 (1): 7-32.
This Science & Technology Studies website ("Site") is owned and operated by The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies (“Society”), PO Box 117, c/o Otto Auranen, Sepänkatu 4-8 A 16, 33230 Tampere,Finland. The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies and its publication Science & Technology Studies are non-profit organizations.
The Society reserves the right to change, modify, add or remove portions of these Terms and Conditions at its discretion at any time and without prior notice. Please check this page periodically for any modifications. Your continued use of this Site following the posting of any changes will mean that you have accepted the changes.Copyrights and Limitations on Use
All content in this Site, including site layout, design, images, text and other information (collectively, the "Content") is the property of The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies/Science & Technology Studies and is protected by copyright and other intellectual property laws, unless otherwise noted.
You may not copy, display, distribute, modify, publish, reproduce, store, transmit, create derivative works from, or sell or license all or any part of the Content, products or services obtained from this Site in any medium to anyone, except as otherwise expressly permitted under applicable law or as described in these Terms and Conditions or relevant license or subscriber agreement.
You may print or download Content from the Site for academic, your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices. You may not engage in systematic retrieval of Content from the Site to create or compile, directly or indirectly, a collection, compilation, database or directory without prior written permission from Science & Technology Studies.
The Site may contain robot exclusion headers, and by using the Site you agree that you will not use any robots, spiders, crawlers or other automated downloading programs or devices to access, search, index, monitor or copy any Content. The harvesting of postal or email addresses from the Site for purposes of sending unsolicited or unauthorized commercial material, is prohibited. Any questions about whether a particular use is authorized and any requests for permission to publish, reproduce, distribute, display or make derivative works from any Content should be directed to the Science & Technology Studies Assistant Editor.
You may not use the services on the Site to publish or distribute any information (including software or other content) that is illegal; violates or infringes upon the rights of any other person; is abusive, hateful, profane, pornographic, threatening or vulgar; contains errors, viruses or other harmful components; or is otherwise actionable by law. Science & Technology Studies may at any time exercise editorial control over the content of any information or material that is submitted or distributed through its facilities and/or services.
You may not, without the approval of Science & Technology Studies, use the Site to publish or distribute any advertising, promotional material, or solicitation to other users of the Site to use any goods or services. For example (but without limitation), you may not use the Site to conduct any business, to solicit the performance of any activity that is prohibited by law, or to solicit other users to become subscribers of other information services. Similarly, you may not use the Site to download and redistribute public information or shareware for personal gain or use the facilities and/or services to distribute multiple copies of public domain information or shareware.Trademarks
All trademarks appearing on this Site are the property of their respective owners.Links to Other Sites
The Site may contain hyperlinks to other sites or resources that are provided solely for your convenience. Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability of external sites or resources linked to the Site, and does not endorse and is not responsible or liable for any content, advertising, products or other materials on or available from such sites or resources. Transactions that occur between you and any third party are strictly between you and the third party and are not the responsibility of Science & Technology Studies. Due to the fact that Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability or accuracy of these outside resources or their contents, you should review the terms and conditions and privacy policies of these linked sites, as their policies may differ from ours.
Last revised: 10 October 2012