On the Plurality of Environmental Regimes of Anticipation
Insights from Forest Science and Management
In recent years, the social sciences have increasingly investigated ways in which futures are anticipated, fostered, and pre-empted. However, less attention has been given to how various predictive approaches inform different ways of acting in the present. Our article presents the results of an investigation into the current practices and agendas of forest scientists and managers in France. We first suggest how an anticipation of environmental futures is coming to the fore as an emerging field of expertise and practices in forest sciences, including predicting but also monitoring, preparing and adapting to projected futures. We then account for the co-existence of three “micro-regimes” of anticipation combining a certain approach to the forest, a certain vision of the future, and a certain type of scientific predictive approach, including different anticipatory objectives, different modelling practices, and different interactions between research and management: i/ Adapting forestry to future climates; ii/ Predicting Future Tree Biology; iii/ Monitoring forests as indicators of climate change.
Adams HD, Williams AP, Xu C, Rauscher SA, Jiang X and, McDowell NG NG (2013)” Empirical and process-based approaches to climate-induced forest mortality models”. Frontiers in Plant Science. 4: 438. doi:10.3389/fpls.2013.00438.
Adams, V., M. Murphy M and A. E. Clarke AE (2009). “Anticipation: Technoscience, life, affect, temporality”. Subjectivity 28 (1):, 246–265.
Aleixandre-Benavent R, Aleixandre-Tudó J, Castelló-Cogollos L, and Aleixandre J (2017). Trends in scientific research on climate change in agriculture and forestry subject areas (2005–2014). Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, pp.: 406-418
Amoore L. (2013). The politics of possibility: risk and security beyond probability. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Result score too low
Ancelin P, Courbaud B, et al. (2004). Development of an individual tree-based mechanical model to predict wind damage within forest stands. Forest ecology and management, 203: 101-121
Anderson B (2010) . “Preemption, precaution, preparedness: anticipatory action and future geographies.” Progress in Human Geography, 34 (6): , pp. 1-22
Andersson J and Duhautois S (2016) “Futures of Mankind: The Emergence of the Global Future.” In: Van Münster R and Casper S (eds) In the Politics of Globality: Assembling the Planet. Oxford, Routledge, pp.106-125
Aradau C, and van Münster R, (2013). Politics of Catastrophe. 1st ed. London [u.a.]: Routledge. Result score too low
Aykut S, Foyer J, Morena E, (eds), Globalising the Climate. COP21 and the climatisation of global debates, Routledge, 2017, 198 p.
Bloomfield, B. P., 1986. Modelling the world. The social constructions of systems. Blackwell: London. Result score too low
Bouchon J (1988), Les tables de production et les modèles de croissance: un outil de diagnostic sylvicole. Revue Forestière Française. XL, n° spécial, pp. 46-50.
Chuine I and Cour P. (1999) “Climatic determinants of budburst seasonality in four temperate-zone tree species”, New Phytologist, 143, pp. 339 – 349
Chuine I. (2000) “A unified model for tree phenology”, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 707, pp. 337 – 347 Result score too low
Coleman R. and Tutton R., 2017. Introduction to Special Issue of Sociological Review on ‘Futures in Question: Theories, Methods, Practices’ The Sociological review 65 (3), pp. 440-447.
Collins H. and Pinch T. (2002) . The Golem at large: What everyone should know about technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cordonnier T, Courbaud B and Franc A, (2006). “The effect of colonization and competition processes on the relation between disturbance and diversity in plant communities.” Journal of Theoretical Biology, 243(1), pp.1–12.
Courbaud B. (1997). Modélisation de l'éclairement et de la croissance de l'épicéa (Picea abies L. Karst) en forêt irrégulière de montagne. PhD Thesis, University of Lyon I. FR. 236 p.
Courbaud B, Lafond V, Lagarrigues G, Vieilledent G, Cordonnier T, Jabot F and de Coligny F (2015). “Applying ecological model evaluation: Lessons learned with the forest dynamics model Samsara2.” Ecological Modelling, 314, pp.1-14.
Courbaud B, Pupin C, Letort A, Cabanettes A and Larrieu L (2017). “Modelling the probability of microhabitat formation on trees using cross-sectional data.” Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 8 (10) pp. 1347 - 1349
Dahan-Dalmedico A, (2010). “Putting the Earth System in a numerical box? The evolution from climate modeling toward global change.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41 (3), pp.282-292.
Dahan-Dalmedico, A. (ed.), 2006. Les Modèles du Futur. La Découverte, Paris. Result score too low
Decocq G, Kalaora B and Vlassopoulou C (2016). La forêt salvatrice. 1st ed. Ceyzérieu (Ain): Champ Vallon. Result score too low
Dufour-Kowalski S, Courbaud B, Dreyfus P, Meredieu C and de Coligny F (2011). “Capsis: an open software framework and community for forest growth modeling.” Annals of Forest Science, 69 (2), pp.221-233.
Edwards P N, (2010) A Vast machine: Computer Models, climate data and the politics of global warming, MIT Press. Result score too low
Estiarte M. et al. (2016) “Few multiyear precipitation-reduction experiments find a shift in the productivity-precipitation relationship”, Global Change Biology, 22, pp. 2570 – 2581 Result score too low
Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S and Berry JA, (1980) “A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species”, Planta, 149, pp. 78 – 90
Frickel S., Gibbon S., Howard, J., Kempner J., Ottinger, G., Hess, D. (2010). “Undone science: charting social movement and civil society challenges to research agenda setting”, Science, Technology & Human values, vol. 35 no. 4, pp. 444-473.
Gea-Izquierdo G. et al. (2015) “Modelling the climatic drivers determining photosynthesis and carbon allocation in evergreen Mediterranean forests using multiproxy long time series” Biogeosciences, 12, pp. 3695 – 3712
Goreaud F, de Coligny F, Courbaud B, Dhôte JF, Dreyfus P et Pérot T (2005). « La modélisation : un outil pour la gestion et l’aménagement en forêt. » VertigO - la revue électronique en sciences de l'environnement 6 (2) URL : http://vertigo.revues.org/4260 ; DOI : 10.4000/vertigo.4260
Gustafson EJ et al. (2015) “Integrating ecophysiology and forest landscape models to improve projections of drought effects under climate change”, Global Change Biology, 21, pp. 843 – 856
Hacking I. (1994) “Styles of Scientific Thinking or Reasoning: a new analytical tool for historians and philosophers of the sciences” in Gavroglu K., Christianidis J., Nicolaidis E. (eds) Trends in the historiography of Science, Boston Studies in the philosophy of science, vol. 151. Springer
Jasanoff S and Martello M (2004). Earthly politics. 1st ed. Cambridge: MIT Press. Result score too low
Jabot F, Faure T and Dumoulin N, (2013). “EasyABC: performing efficient approximate Bayesian computation sampling schemes using R.” Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4 (7), pp.684–687.
Knorr-Cetina K. (1999). Epistemic Cultures. How the sciences make knowledge,. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England, Harvard University Press. Result score too low
Korzukhin MD, Ter-Mikaelian MT and Wagner RG, (1996). “Process versus empirical models: which approach for forest ecosystem management?” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 26(5), pp.879–887.
Kwa C. (2011). Styles of knowing. A new history of science from ancient times to the present. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Lagarrigues G. (2017) “Effects of environmental gradients on demographic processes and the durability of the uneven-aged forest management: application of Approximate Bayesian computation to improve simulation models”, PhD-Thesis, Irstea Grenoble Result score too low
Lafond V et al. (2017). “Trade-offs and synergies between ecosystem services in uneven-aged mountain forests: evidences using Pareto fronts” . European Journal of Forest Research. Pp. 1-16
Legay JM (1997) L’expérience et le modèle – Un discours de la méthode, Sciences en question, INRA, Paris. Result score too low
Lempereur M et al. (2017) “Recent climate hiatus revealed dual control by temperature and drought on the stem of Mediterranean Quercus ilex” Global Change Biology, 23, pp. 42 – 55
Leslie, P, H (1948) “Some further notes on the use of matrices in population mathematics”, Biometrika, 35:213-245
Loustau D. (dir.) (2004) Final report of the project CARBOFOR. Carbon sequestration in the big forest ecosystems in France. Quantification, spatialization, vulnerability and impacts of different climatic and forestry scenarios Result score too low
Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW. (1972). The Limits to Growth: a report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind, Universe Book
Michael M. (2017) “Enacting Big Futures, Little Futures: Toward an ecology of futures”, The Sociological Review, Vol. 65, 3, pp. 509-524.
Misson L. et al. (2009) “Functional changes in the control of carbon flux after 3 years of increased drought in a Mediterranean evergreen forest?” Global Change Biology, 16, pp. 2461 – 2475 Result score too low
Morin X., Fahse L., Scherer-Lorenzen M and Bugmann H. (2011) “Tree species richness promotes productivity in temperate forests through strong complementarity between species”, Ecological Letters, 17, pp.1526 – 1535
Morin X et al., (2014). “Temporal stability in forest productivity increases with tree diversity due to asynchrony in species dynamics.” Ecology Letters, 17(12), pp.1526–1535.
Perez-Ramos IM, Ourcival JM, Limousin JM and Rambal S (2010) “Mast seeding under increasing drought: results from a long-term dataset and from a rainfall exclusion experiment”, Ecology, 91, pp. 3057 - 3068
Pestre D (2003). “Regimes of knowledge production in society: Towards a more political and social reading.” Minerva, 41 (3), pp.245–261. Result score too low
Renecofor’s assessment committee (2006) Renecofor network’s evaluation. Suggestions for the future. 14th November 2006 Result score too low
Roques A. (ed) (2015) Processionary Moths and Climate Change: An Update, Springer Netherlands, pp. 427 Result score too low
Rossi JP et al.,(2015). “Trees outside forests in agricultural landscapes: spatial distribution and impact on habitat connectivity for forest organisms.” Landscape Ecology, 31 (2), pp.243–254.
Sarewitz D., Pielke R-A., and Byerly R. (eds) (2000). Prediction: science, decision making and the future of nature. Island Press: Washington DC. Result score too low
Shinn T. (1999) “Change or mutation? Reflections on the foundations of contemporary science”, Social Science information, 38/1, pp. 149-176
Skrydstrup M, (2017). “Envisioning the future by predicting the past: Proxies, praxis and prognosis in paleoclimatology”. Futures . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.03.004
Tavory I and Eliasoph N, (2013). “Coordinating Futures: Toward a Theory of Anticipation.” American Journal of Sociology. 118 (4), pp.908–942.
Thuiller W. (2003) “BIOMOD – optimizing predictions of species distributions and projecting potential future shifts under global change”, Global Change Biology, Vol. 9, 10, pp. 1353 – 1362
Vieilledent G et al., (2010). “Individual variability in tree allometry determines light resource allocation in forest ecosystems: a hierarchical Bayesian approach.” Oecologia, 163 (3), pp.759–773.
This Science & Technology Studies website ("Site") is owned and operated by The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies (“Society”), PO Box 117, c/o Otto Auranen, Sepänkatu 4-8 A 16, 33230 Tampere,Finland. The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies and its publication Science & Technology Studies are non-profit organizations.
The Society reserves the right to change, modify, add or remove portions of these Terms and Conditions at its discretion at any time and without prior notice. Please check this page periodically for any modifications. Your continued use of this Site following the posting of any changes will mean that you have accepted the changes.Copyrights and Limitations on Use
All content in this Site, including site layout, design, images, text and other information (collectively, the "Content") is the property of The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies/Science & Technology Studies and is protected by copyright and other intellectual property laws, unless otherwise noted.
You may not copy, display, distribute, modify, publish, reproduce, store, transmit, create derivative works from, or sell or license all or any part of the Content, products or services obtained from this Site in any medium to anyone, except as otherwise expressly permitted under applicable law or as described in these Terms and Conditions or relevant license or subscriber agreement.
You may print or download Content from the Site for academic, your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices. You may not engage in systematic retrieval of Content from the Site to create or compile, directly or indirectly, a collection, compilation, database or directory without prior written permission from Science & Technology Studies.
The Site may contain robot exclusion headers, and by using the Site you agree that you will not use any robots, spiders, crawlers or other automated downloading programs or devices to access, search, index, monitor or copy any Content. The harvesting of postal or email addresses from the Site for purposes of sending unsolicited or unauthorized commercial material, is prohibited. Any questions about whether a particular use is authorized and any requests for permission to publish, reproduce, distribute, display or make derivative works from any Content should be directed to the Science & Technology Studies Assistant Editor.
You may not use the services on the Site to publish or distribute any information (including software or other content) that is illegal; violates or infringes upon the rights of any other person; is abusive, hateful, profane, pornographic, threatening or vulgar; contains errors, viruses or other harmful components; or is otherwise actionable by law. Science & Technology Studies may at any time exercise editorial control over the content of any information or material that is submitted or distributed through its facilities and/or services.
You may not, without the approval of Science & Technology Studies, use the Site to publish or distribute any advertising, promotional material, or solicitation to other users of the Site to use any goods or services. For example (but without limitation), you may not use the Site to conduct any business, to solicit the performance of any activity that is prohibited by law, or to solicit other users to become subscribers of other information services. Similarly, you may not use the Site to download and redistribute public information or shareware for personal gain or use the facilities and/or services to distribute multiple copies of public domain information or shareware.Trademarks
All trademarks appearing on this Site are the property of their respective owners.Links to Other Sites
The Site may contain hyperlinks to other sites or resources that are provided solely for your convenience. Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability of external sites or resources linked to the Site, and does not endorse and is not responsible or liable for any content, advertising, products or other materials on or available from such sites or resources. Transactions that occur between you and any third party are strictly between you and the third party and are not the responsibility of Science & Technology Studies. Due to the fact that Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability or accuracy of these outside resources or their contents, you should review the terms and conditions and privacy policies of these linked sites, as their policies may differ from ours.
Last revised: 10 October 2012