Making Room for Ethics
Spaces, Surveys and Standards in the Asia-Pacific Region
This article examines the work that goes in to ‘making room’ for ethics, literally and figuratively. It follows the activities of a capacity building Asia-Pacific NGO in training and recognising ethics review committees, using multi-sited field materials collected over 12 months between 2009 and 2010. Two queries drive this article: first, how are spaces made for ethical review –politically, infrastructurally, materially – as committee members campaign for attention to ethics and access to offices in which to conduct their meetings? Second, how are the limits of ‘local circumstance’ negotiated during a review of the committee’s work: what does the implementation of standards in the area of ethics look like? I then discuss what standards of ethics practice mean for more fraught questions of the universal in bioethics. Rather than regarding ethics systems as backgrounds to global health projects, this article’s STS and ethnographic approach reveals ethical review as a site of contested standardisation.
Benatar, S (1998) Imperialism, research ethics and global health. Journal of Medical Ethics 24: 221-222.
Benatar, S and Singer P (2010) Responsibilities in international research: a new look revisited. Journal of Medical Ethics 36(4): 194–197.
Brada, B (2011) Not here: making the spaces and subjects of "global health" in Botswana. Cultural Medical Psychiatry 35(2): 285-312.
Brown, TM, Cueto M and Fee, E (2006) The World Health Organization and the Transition from "International" to "Global" Public Health. American Journal of Public Health 96(1): 62-72.
Bowker, G (1994) Science on the Run: Information Management and Industrial Geophysics at Schlumberger, 1920–1940. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bowker, G and Star S (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classificaiton and its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Busch, L (2011) Standards: Recipes for Reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Buse, K Hein W and Drager N (2009) Making Sense of Global Health Governance: A Policy Perspective London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Carse, A (2014) Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chokevivat, V (2011) The FERCAP Story: A Decade of Fruitful Collaboration with Partners in Ethical Health Research. In: Torres, C and Navrro A FERCAP @10 In commemoration of a decade of capacity building in ethical health research in the Asia-Pacific Region. Pathumthani: Forum for Ethics Review Committees in the Asian and Western Pacific Region, 6-10.
Christakis, N (1992) Ethics are local: Engaging cross-cultural variation in the ethics for clinical research. Social Science and Medicine 35: 1079–1091.
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) (2002) International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. CIOMS: Geneva.
Crane, JT (2014) Scrambling for Africa: AIDS, Expertise and the Rise of American Global Health Sciences Cornell University Press, Ithaca NY.
Crump, JA, Sugarman J, Working Group on Ethics Guidelines for Global Health Training (WEIGHT) (2010) Ethics and Best Practice Guielines for Training Experiences in Global Health. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 83(6):1178-1182.
Delise, H, Hatcher Roberts J, Munro, M, Jones, L and Gyorkos T W (2005) The role of NGOs in global health research for development. Health Research Policy and Systems 3(3): 1-21 doi:10.1186/1478-4505-3-3
Dingwall, R (2007) "Turn off the Oxygen..." Law & Society Review 41(4): 787-795.
Douglas-Jones, R (2013) Locating Ethics: capacity building, ethics review and research governance across Asia. PhD Thesis, Durham University UK. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/6970
Douglas-Jones, R (2015) A'good' ethical review: audit and professionalism in research ethics Social Anthropology 23(1): 53-57.
Douglas-Jones, R and Shaffner, J (2017) Capacity Building in Ethnographic Comparison The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 35(1): 1-18.
Dunn, EC (2005) Standards and Person-Making in East Central Europe. In: Ong A and Collier S (eds) Global Assemblages Oxford: Blckwell Publishing, 173–193.
Dunn, EC (2009) Standards Without Infrastructure. In: Lampland M and Star S (eds) Standards and their Stories. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 118–121.
Eckstein, S (2004) Efforts to build capacity in research ethics: an overview. In: Science and Development Network Policy Briefs, Middle East and North Africa. http://www.scidev.net/en/middle-east-and-north-africa/policy-briefs/efforts-to-build-capacity-in-research-ethics-an- ov.html (accessed 12 January 2016)
Engel, N Van Hoyweghen, I and Krumeich A (2014) Making Global Health Care Innovation Work. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Engel, N and Zeiss R (2013) Situating Standards in Practices: Multi drug-resistant Tuberculosis Treatment in India. Science as Culture 23(2): 201-225.
Erikson, S L (2008) Getting Political: Fighting for Global Health. Lancet 371:1229-1230.
European Medicines Agency (EMA) (2012) Reflection Paper on Ethical and GCP aspects of Clinical Trials of Medicinal Products for human use conducted outside of the EU/EEA and submitted in marketing authorisation applications to the EU Regulatory Authorities. EMA/121340/2011.
Foucault, M (1983) The Subject and Power. In: Dreyfus H and Rabinow, P (eds) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 208–226.
Furlong, K (2010) Small technologies, big change: Rethinking infrastructure through STS and geography. Progress in Human Geography 1-23 (online first).
Garrett, L (2007) The Challenge of Global Health. Foreign Affairs 86(1):14-18.
Ghooi, RB (2015) Accreditation - A solution for problems or a fresh problem? Perspectives in Clinical Research 6(3), 123–124. http://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.159932
Gieryn, TF (2002) What Buildings Do. Theory and Society 31(1):35-74.
Haraway, D (1995) Cyborgs and Symbionts: Living Together in the New World Order in C H Gray, H J Figueria-Sarriera and S Mentor (eds). The Cyborg Handbook London: Routledge pp. Xi-xx.
Harvey, P, and Knox, H (2012) The Enchantments of Infrastructure. Mobilities 7(4): 521-36.
Harvey, P, Jensen CB and Morita, A (2017) Infrastructures and Social Complexity: A Companion Routledge, Oxford and New York.
Hedgecoe, A (2012) The problems of presumed isomorphism and the ethics review of social science: a response to Schrag. Research Ethics 8(2):79-86.
Hedgecoe, A (2015) Reputational Risk, Academic Freedom and Research Ethics Review. Sociology 1-16.
Higgins W, and Tamm Hallström K (2007) Standardization, globalization and rationalities of government. Organization 14:685–704
Hogle, L (1995) Standardization across Non-Standard Domains: The Case of Organ Procurement. Science, Technology and Human Values 20(4): 482-500.
Hyder, A Wali, S Kahn, N Teoh, N, Kass, N and Dawson, L (2004) Ethical review of health research: a perspective from developing country researchers Journal of Medical Ethics 30:68-72.
International Conference on Harmonisation (1996) Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. http:// www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E6_R1/ Step4/E6_R1__Guideline.pdf (accessed June 15, 2016).
Jafarey, A Iqbal, S and Hassan, M (2012) Ethical Review in Pakistan: the credibility gap. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association 62(12): 1354-1357.
Jasanoff, S (ed) (2004) States of Knowledge. The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. London, New York: Routledge.
Karbwang-Laothavorn, J (2011) SIDCER @ 10. In: Torres, C and Navarro, A (eds) FERCAP@10: In commemoration of a decade of capacity building in ethical health research in the Asia-Pacific Region, Forum for Ethics Review Committees in the Asian and Western Pacific Region: Pathumthani, 11–16.
Kass, N Adnan E Hyder A, Ajuwon, A Appiah-Poku, J Barsdorf, N Elsayed D, Mokhachane, M Mupenda, B Ndebele, P Ndossi, G Sikateyo, B Tangwa, G Tindana, P (2007) The Structure and Function of Research Ethics Committees in Africa: A Case Study PLOS Medicine 4(1): 26-31.
Kleinman, A (1999) Moral Experience and Ethical Reflection: Can Ethnography Reconcile Them? A Quandry for "The New Bioethics" Bioethics and Beyond. Daedalus 128: 69-99.
Langsan, M and Dennis R (2004) Building capacity in health research in the developing world. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation 82: 764-770.
Latour, B and Callon, M (1981) Unscrewing the big Leviathan: how actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In Knorr-Cetina K and Cicourel AV (eds) Advances in social theory and methodology: Towards an integration of mico- and macro- sociologies. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 277-303.
Lairumbi, G Parker M, Fitzpatrick, R and English, M (2011) Ethics in Practice: the State of the Debate on Promoting the Social Value of Global Health Research in Resource Poor Settings Particularly Africa BMC Medical Ethics 12 (1) 22.
Law, J and Lin, W. (2017) Provincializing STS: Postcoloniality, Symmetry and Method East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 11:1-17.
Macklin, R (1999) Against Relativism: Cultural Diversity and the Search for Ethical Universals in Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Margolis, C Deckelbaum, R Henkin, Y and Alkan, M (2002) Bringing Global Issues to Medical Teaching The Lancet 359(9313): 1253–1254.
McInnes, C Kamrandt-Scott, A Lee, K Reubi, D Roemer-Mahler, A Rushton, S Williams, O Woodling M (2012) Framing Global Health: the Governance Challenge Global Public Health 7(2): S83-S94. Mertz, E and Timmer, A. Getting it Done: Ethnographic Perspectives on NGOs. Political and Legal Journal of Anthropology 33(2): 171-177.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioural Research (USA) (1979) The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Office of the Secretary, Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
Neufeld, V Cole, D Boyd, A Njelesani, D Bates, I and Hanney, S (2014) Perspectives on Evaluating Global Health Research for Development: A Background Paper. Canadian Coalition for Global Health Research.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2002) The Ethics of Research Related to Healthcare in Developing Countries. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
Petryna, A (2005) Ethical Variablity: Drug Development and Globalizing Clinical Trials. American Ethnologist 32(2):183-197.
Ridley, R (2010) Letter from TDR's director: The importance of being earnest. TDRnews 86: 2-3.
Riles, A (2002) User Friendly: Informality and Expertise. Law and Social Inquiry 27: 613–619.
Rodrigues, R (2015) Ethics assessment and Guidance in Different Types of Organisations: Standards, certification and accreditation organisations, Annex 3.i, Ethical Assessment of Research and Innovation: A Comparative Analysis of Practices and Institutions in the EU and selected other countries, Deliverable 1.1, SATORI project http://satoriproject.eu/media/3.i-Standards-certification-and-accr-orgs.pdf
Schrag, Z (2011) The Case Against Ethics Review in the Social Sciences. Research Ethics 7(4):120–131.
Simpson, B and Sariola, S (2012) Blinding Authority: Randomized Clinical Trials and the Production of Global Scientific Knowledge in Contemporary Sri Lanka. Science, Technology and Human Values 37(5):555–575.
Stapleton, G, Scröder-Bäck, P, Laaser, U, Meershoek, A, Popa, D (2014) Global health ethics: an introduction to prominent theories and relevant topics Global Health Action 7: 23569
Star, S (1990) Power, Technology and the Phenomenology of Convention: On Being Allergic to Onions. In: Law, J (ed) A Sociology of Monsters? Power, Technology and the Modern World, Oxford: Basil Blackwell 27–57.
Star, S (1995) The politics of formal representations: wizards, gurus, and organizational complexity. In Star, SL (ed.) Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology. Albany: State Univ. N. Y. Press, 88–118.
Star, S (1999) The ethnography of infrastructure American Behavioural Scientist 43(3): 377–391.
Star, S and M Lampland (2009) Reckoning with Standards. In: Lampland M and Star SL (eds) Standards and their Stories: How Quantifying, Classifying and Formalizing practices shape everyday life Cornell, NY: Cornell University Press, 3-33.
Stark, L (2011a) Meetings by the Minute(s): How Documents Create Decisions for Institutional Review Boards. In : Camic C, Gross N and Lamont M Social Knowledge in the Making Chicago: Chicago University Press, 233–256.
Stark, L (2011b) Behind Closed Doors: IRBs and the making of Ethical Research Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Kindle Edition.
Stephen, C and Daibes, I (2010) Defining Features of the Practice of Global Health Research: an Examination of 14 Global Health Research Teams. Global Health Action 3: 5188.
Stoler, A (2008) Imperial debris: Reflections on ruins and ruination. Cultural Anthropology 23(2):191-219.
Strategic Initiative in Developing Capacity in Ethical Review (SIDCER) (2005). SIDCER Recognition Program. Available at: http://www.sidcer.org/new_web/pdf/2006/2006_sidcer_recognition_curriculum.pdf (accessed 28.4.2017).
Strathern, M (1995) "The nice thing about culture is everyone has it." In: M Strathern (ed) Shifting Contexts: Transformations in Anthropological Knowledge. London: Routledge, 153–170.
Strathern, M (1998) Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things London: The Athlone Press.
Street, A (2012). Affective Infrastructure: Hospital Landscapes of Hope and Failure. Space and Culture 15:44-56.
Street, A (2014) Biomedicine in an Unstable Place: Infrastructure and Personhood in a Papua New Guinean Hospital. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Taylor, H (2007) Moving beyond Compliance: Measuring Ethical Quality to Enhance the Oversight of Human Subjects Research. IRB: Ethics and Human Research 29 (5): 9-14.
TDR (2008) Our 30 year history: 30 years of research and capacity building in tropical diseases Available at http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/43689/1/9789241595575_eng.pdf (accessed 28.4.17).
Timmermans, S and Berg M (2003) The Gold Standard: The Challenge of Evidence-Based Medicine Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press
Timmermans, S and Epstein, S (2010) A World of Standards but not a Standard World: Toward a Sociology of Standards and Standardization. Annual Review of Sociology 36: 69–89.
Torres, C (2011) Reflections on the FERCAP Experience: Moving Forward with Partnerships and Networks. In: Torres, C and Navarro, A (eds) FERCAP@10: In commemoration of a decade of capacity building in ethical health research in the Asia-Pacific Region, Forum for Ethics Review Committees in the Asian and Western Pacific Region: Pathumthani, 43–53.
World Health Organisation (2000) Operational Guidelines for Ethics Committees that Review Biomedical Research. Geneva: WHO Press.
World Health Organisation (2002) Surveying and Evaluating Ethical Review Practices. A complementary guideline to the Operational Guidelines for Ethics Committees that Review Biomedical Research. Geneva: WHO Press.
World Health Organization (2009) Casebook on Ethical Issues in International Health Research. Geneva: WHO Press.
World Health Organization (2015) Strategic Initiative for Developing Capacity in Ethical Review. http://www.who.int/sidcer/en/
World Medical Association (WMA) (2013) World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Journal of the American Medical Association 310 (20):2191–2194
Yassi, A, Breilh, J, Dharamsi, S Lockhart, K and Spiegel, J (2013) The Ethics of Ethics Review in Global Health Research: Case Studies Applying a New Paradigm Journal of Academic Ethics 11:83-101.
This Science & Technology Studies website ("Site") is owned and operated by The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies (“Society”), PO Box 117, c/o Otto Auranen, Sepänkatu 4-8 A 16, 33230 Tampere,Finland. The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies and its publication Science & Technology Studies are non-profit organizations.
The Society reserves the right to change, modify, add or remove portions of these Terms and Conditions at its discretion at any time and without prior notice. Please check this page periodically for any modifications. Your continued use of this Site following the posting of any changes will mean that you have accepted the changes.Copyrights and Limitations on Use
All content in this Site, including site layout, design, images, text and other information (collectively, the "Content") is the property of The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies/Science & Technology Studies and is protected by copyright and other intellectual property laws, unless otherwise noted.
You may not copy, display, distribute, modify, publish, reproduce, store, transmit, create derivative works from, or sell or license all or any part of the Content, products or services obtained from this Site in any medium to anyone, except as otherwise expressly permitted under applicable law or as described in these Terms and Conditions or relevant license or subscriber agreement.
You may print or download Content from the Site for academic, your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices. You may not engage in systematic retrieval of Content from the Site to create or compile, directly or indirectly, a collection, compilation, database or directory without prior written permission from Science & Technology Studies.
The Site may contain robot exclusion headers, and by using the Site you agree that you will not use any robots, spiders, crawlers or other automated downloading programs or devices to access, search, index, monitor or copy any Content. The harvesting of postal or email addresses from the Site for purposes of sending unsolicited or unauthorized commercial material, is prohibited. Any questions about whether a particular use is authorized and any requests for permission to publish, reproduce, distribute, display or make derivative works from any Content should be directed to the Science & Technology Studies Assistant Editor.
You may not use the services on the Site to publish or distribute any information (including software or other content) that is illegal; violates or infringes upon the rights of any other person; is abusive, hateful, profane, pornographic, threatening or vulgar; contains errors, viruses or other harmful components; or is otherwise actionable by law. Science & Technology Studies may at any time exercise editorial control over the content of any information or material that is submitted or distributed through its facilities and/or services.
You may not, without the approval of Science & Technology Studies, use the Site to publish or distribute any advertising, promotional material, or solicitation to other users of the Site to use any goods or services. For example (but without limitation), you may not use the Site to conduct any business, to solicit the performance of any activity that is prohibited by law, or to solicit other users to become subscribers of other information services. Similarly, you may not use the Site to download and redistribute public information or shareware for personal gain or use the facilities and/or services to distribute multiple copies of public domain information or shareware.Trademarks
All trademarks appearing on this Site are the property of their respective owners.Links to Other Sites
The Site may contain hyperlinks to other sites or resources that are provided solely for your convenience. Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability of external sites or resources linked to the Site, and does not endorse and is not responsible or liable for any content, advertising, products or other materials on or available from such sites or resources. Transactions that occur between you and any third party are strictly between you and the third party and are not the responsibility of Science & Technology Studies. Due to the fact that Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability or accuracy of these outside resources or their contents, you should review the terms and conditions and privacy policies of these linked sites, as their policies may differ from ours.
Last revised: 10 October 2012