The Factish in the Field
An Anthropological Inquiry of Genetically Modified Seeds and Yields as Beings
Research in GM crops is of pressing importance to biotechnologists, development economists, government officials, and concerned citizens. Each of these stakeholders carries preconceived notions of success and failure that not only influence how data regarding GM crops is shared but also reify the objective reality of GM seeds as a technology that might exist outside the idiosyncracies of a farmer’s field. In this essay, I draw on ethnographic fieldwork conducted among GM cotton planting farmers in Telangana, India to deconstruct the process by which scientific facts are created, leveraged, and then divorced from their subjective contexts in agricultural research. In paying closer attention to the ways that the science of agricultural development has limited possibilities of farmer experience and transformed GM seeds into autonomous beings, this paper attempts to take up Latour’s call for a compositionist investigation of a common world slowly assembled by its constituent actors.
Beckert, Sven. 2014. Empire of Cotton: A Global History. New York: Knopf.
Blancke, Stefaan, Frank Van Breusegem, Geert De Jaeger, Johan Braeckman, and Marc Van Montagu. 2015. "Fatal Attraction: The Intuitive Appeal of GMO Opposition." Trends in Plant Science 20 (7): 414–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.03.011.
Bonneuil, Christophe, and Les Levidow. 2012. "How Does the World Trade Organization Know? The Mobilization and Staging of Scientific Expertise in the GMO Trade Dispute." Social Studies of Science 42 (1): 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711430151.
Brooks, Andrew. 2015. Clothing Poverty: The Hidden World of Fast Fashion and Second-Hand Clothes. London: Zed Books.
Busch, Lawrence, Jeffrey Burkhardt, and William B. Lacy. 1990. Plants, Power, and Profit: Social, Economic, and Ethical Consequences of the New Biotechnologies. Cambridge, Mass., USA: B. Blackwell.
Charles, Daniel. 2001. Lords of the Harvest: Biotech, Big Money, and the Future of Food. New York: Basic Books.
Cotton Corporation of India Ltd. 2014. "44th Annual Report 2013-2014." Annual Report 44. Mumbai: Cotton Corporation of India Ltd.
Crost, Benjamin, Bhavani Shankar, Richard Bennett, and Stephen Morse. 2007. "Bias from Farmer Self-Selection in Genetically Modified Crop Productivity Estimates: Evidence from Indian Data." Journal of Agricultural Economics 58 (1): 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2007.00076.x.
Dreifus, Claudia. 2008. "An Advocate for Science Diplomacy." The New York Times, August 19, 2008, sec. Science. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/19/science/19conv.html.
Fedoroff, Nina V. 2011. "Genetically Engineered Food for All." The New York Times, August 18, 2011, sec. Opinion. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/19/opinion/genetically-engineered-food-for-all.html.
Ferguson, James. 1994. The Anti-Politics Machine: "Development," Depoliticization and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press.
Flachs, Andrew. 2015. "Persistent Agrobiodiversity on Genetically Modified Cotton Farms in Telangana, India." Journal of Ethnobiology 35 (2): 406–26. https://doi.org/10.2993/etbi-35-02-406-426.1.
Forster, Dionys, Christian Andres, Rajeev Verma, Christine Zundel, Monika M. Messmer, and Paul Mäder. 2013. "Yield and Economic Performance of Organic and Conventional Cotton-Based Farming Systems – Results from a Field Trial in India." PLoS ONE 8 (12): e81039. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081039.
Graff, Gregory D., Gal Hochman, and David Zilberman. 2009. "The Political Economy of Agricultural Biotechnology Policies." April 24, 2009. http://agbioforum.org/v12n1/v12n1a04-graff.htm.
Gruère, Guillaume, and Debdatta Sengupta. 2011. "Bt Cotton and Farmer Suicides in India: An Evidence-Based Assessment." Journal of Development Studies 47 (2): 316–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2010.492863.
Gruère, Guillaume, and Yan Sun. 2012. "Measuring the Contribution of Bt Cotton Adoption to India's Cotton Yields Leap." IFPRI discussion paper 01170. Environment and Production Technology Division. IFPRI.
Guha, Ramachandra. 2008. India after Gandhi: The History of the World's Largest Democracy. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
Gupta, Akhil. 1998. Postcolonial Developments: Agriculture in the Making of Modern India. Durham: Duke University Press Books.
———. 2017. "Farming as Speculative Activity: The Ecological Basis of Farmers' Suicides in India." In The Routledge Companion to the Environmental Humanities, edited by Ursula K. Heise, Jon Christensen, and Michelle Niemann, 1 edition, 185–93. London ; New York, NY: Routledge.
Gutierrez, Andrew Paul, Luigi Ponti, Hans R. Herren, Johann Baumgärtner, and Peter E. Kenmore. 2015. "Deconstructing Indian Cotton: Weather, Yields, and Suicides." Environmental Sciences Europe 27 (1): 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-015-0043-8.
Harmon, Amy. 2014. "A Lonely Quest for Facts on Genetically Modified Crops." The New York Times, January 4, 2014, Online edition. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/05/us/on-hawaii-a-lonely-quest-for-facts-about-gmos.html.
Herring, Ronald J. 2007. "Stealth Seeds: Bioproperty, Biosafety, Biopolitics." Journal of Development Studies 43 (1): 130–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380601055601.
———. 2013. "Reconstructing Facts with Bt Cotton: Why Scepticism Fails." Economic and Political Weekly 48 (33): 63–66.
———. 2015. "State Science, Risk and Agricultural Biotechnology: Bt Cotton to Bt Brinjal in India." The Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (1): 159–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.951835.
Herring, Ronald J., and N Chandrasekhara Rao. 2012. "On the 'Failure of Bt Cotton': Analysing a Decade of Experience." Economic and Political Weekly 47 (18): 45–53.
Jasanoff, Sheila. 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
Jha, Dilip Kumar. 2013. "Bt Cotton Losing Steam, Productivity at 5-Yr Low." Business Standard India, February 7, 2013. http://www.business-standard.com/article/markets/bt-cotton-losing-steam-productivity-at-5-yr-low-113020601016_1.html.
Kathage, Jonas, and Matin Qaim. 2012. "Economic Impacts and Impact Dynamics of Bt (Bacillus Thuringiensis) Cotton in India." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (29): 11652–56. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1203647109.
Kouser, Shahzad, and Matin Qaim. 2011. "Impact of Bt Cotton on Pesticide Poisoning in Smallholder Agriculture: A Panel Data Analysis." Ecological Economics, Special Section - Earth System Governance: Accountability and Legitimacy, 70 (11): 2105–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.008.
Kranthi, KR. 2014. "Cotton Production Systems - Need for a Change in India." Cotton Statistics & News, December 16, 2014.
Lalitha, N, and PK Viswanathan. 2015. "Technology Diffusion and Adoption in Cotton Cultivation: Emerging Scenario in Gujarat." AgBioForum: The Journal of Agrobiotechnology Management & Economics 18 (2): 209–20.
Latour, Bruno. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
———. 2003. "The Promises of Constructivism." In Chasing Technoscience: Matrix for Materiality, edited by Don Ihde and Evan Selinger, 27–46. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
———. 2010a. "An Attempt at a 'Compositionist Manifesto.'" New Literary History 41 (3): 471–90.
———. 2010b. On the Modern Cult of the Factish Gods. Durham [NC]; London: Duke University Press.
———. 2013. An inquiry into modes of existence: an anthropology of the moderns. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Law, John. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. New York: Routledge.
Lury, Celia, and Nina Wakeford. 2012. "Introduction: A Perpetual Inventory." In Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social, edited by Celia Lury and Nina Wakeford, 1–24. New York: Routledge.
Monsanto Company. 2012. "Monsanto India Limited Annual Report." Annual Report 2012. St. Louis: Monsanto.
Nair, K. P. Prabhakaran. 2013. "Failure of Monsanto Bt Cotton." The New Indian Express. 2013. http://www.newindianexpress.com/opinion/Failure-of-Monsanto-Bt-Cotton/2013/12/06/article1930013.ece.
Paarlberg, Robert L. 2001. The Politics of Precaution: Genetically Modified Crops in Developing Countries. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
———. 2002. "The Real Threat to GM Crops in Poor Countries: Consumer and Policy Resistance to GM Foods in Rich Countries." Food Policy 27 (3): 247–50.
Pandian, Anand. 2009. Crooked Stalks: Cultivating Virtue in South India. Durham: Duke University Press Books.
Parsai, Gargi. 2012. "Protests Mark 10th Anniversary of Bt Cotton." The Hindu, March 27, 2012, sec. Science & Technology. http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/agriculture/article3248530.ece.
Pearson, Mark. 2006. "'Science', Representation and Resistance: The Bt Cotton Debate in Andhra Pradesh, India." The Geographical Journal 172 (4): 306–17.
Plewis, Ian. 2014. "Indian Farmer Suicides: Is GM Cotton to Blame?" Significance 11 (1): 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2014.00719.x.
Porter, Theodore M. 1996. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
Qaim, Matin. 2010. "Benefits of Genetically Modified Crops for the Poor: Household Income, Nutrition, and Health." New Biotechnology 27 (5): 552–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2010.07.009.
Qaim, Matin, and David Zilberman. 2003. "Yield Effects of Genetically Modified Crops in Developing Countries." Science 299 (5608): 900–902. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1080609.
Richards, Paul. 1993. "Cultivation: Knowledge or Performance?" In An Anthropological Critique of Development: The Growth of Ignorance, edited by Mark Hobart, 61–78. New York: Routledge.
Rodrigues, Aruna. 2010. "Back From the Brink." Frontline, 2010. http://www.frontlineonnet.com/fl2705/stories/20100312270501100.htm.
Rogers, Everett M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press.
Rottenburg, Richard, and Sally E. Merry. 2015. "The World of Indicators: The Making of Governmental Knowledge through Quantification." In The World of Indicators: The Making of Governmental Knowledge through Quantification, edited by Richard Rottenburg, Sally E. Merry, Sung-Joon Park, and Johanna Mugler. Cambridge University Press.
Ryan, Bryce, and Neal C. Gross. 1943. "The Diffusion of Hybrid Seed Corn In Two Iowa Communities." Rural Sociology 8 (1): 15–24.
Schmid, Otto. 2007. "Development of Standards for Organic Farming." In Organic Farming: An International History, edited by William Lockeretz, 152–74. Cambridge: CABI.
Schurman, Rachel, and William A. Munro. 2010. Fighting for the Future of Food: Activists Versus Agribusiness in the Struggle Over Biotechnology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Scoones, Ian. 2006. Science, Agriculture and the Politics of Policy: The Case of Biotechnology in India. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan.
———. 2008. "Mobilizing Against GM Crops in India, South Africa, and Brazil." Journal of Agrarian Change 8 (2 and 3): 315–44.
Shiva, Vandana, Afsar H Jafri, Ashok Emani, and Manish Pande. 2002. Seeds of Suicide. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Research Foundation for Science, Technology, and Ecology.
Stengers, Isabelle. 2010. Cosmopolitics I. Translated by Robert Bononno. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
———. 2011. Cosmopolitics II. Translated by Robert Bononno. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Stoll, Steven. 2002. Larding the Lean Earth: Soil and Society in Nineteenth Century America. New York: Hill and Wang.
Stone, Glenn Davis. 2002. "Both Sides Now: Fallacies in the Genetic-Modification Wars, Implications for Developing Countries, and Anthropological Perspectives." Current Anthropology 43 (4): 611–30.
———. 2007. "Agricultural Deskilling and the Spread of Genetically Modified Cotton in Warangal." Current Anthropology 48 (1): 67–103.
———. 2011. "Field versus Farm in Warangal: Bt Cotton, Higher Yields, and Larger Questions." World Development 39 (3): 387–98.
———. 2012. "Constructing Facts: Bt Cotton Narratives in India." Economic and Political Weekly 47 (38): 62–70.
———. 2013. "A Response to Herring and Rao." Economic and Political Weekly 48 (33): 70–72.
———. 2016. "Towards a General Theory of Agricultural Knowledge Production: Environmental, Social, and Didactic Learning." Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment 38 (1): 5–17.
Stone, Glenn Davis, and Andrew Flachs. 2014. "The Problem with the Farmer's Voice." Agriculture and Human Values, August, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-014-9535-1.
Thaindian News. 2008. "Genetic Engineering Can Help Solve Food Crisis: US Expert." Thaindian News. July 29, 2008. http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/sci-tech/genetic-engineering-can-help-solve-food-crisis-us-expert_10077548.html.
The Economic Times. 2013a. "Bt Cotton Attracting Youngsters to Farming in India: Survey." The Economic Times. 2013. http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-12-15/news/45216500_1_bt-cotton-cotton-farming-cotton-improvement.
———. 2013b. "Farmers Prefer Growing Genetically Modified Crops: Sharad Pawar." The Economic Times, August 27, 2013, Online edition. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/agriculture/farmers-prefer-growing-genetically-modified-crops-sharad-pawar/articleshow/22095086.cms.
The Hindu. 2013. "Use of Bt. Cotton Increased Yield, Farmers' Income: Pawar." The Hindu, August 29, 2013. http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/use-of-bt-cotton-increased-yield-farmers-income-pawar/article5069072.ece.
Tripp, Robert, and Suresh Pal. 2000. "Information and Agricultural Input Markets: Pearl Millet Seed in Rajasthan." Journal of International Development 12 (1): 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(200001)12:1<133::AID-JID625>3.0.CO;2-J.
Vasavi, A. R. 2012. Shadow Space: Suicides And The Predicament Of Rural India. Gurgaon: Three Essays Collective.
Veettil, Prakashan Chellattan, Vijesh V. Krishna, and Matin Qaim. 2016. "Ecosystem Impacts of Pesticide Reductions through Bt Cotton Adoption." Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, August, n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12171.
Vrieze, Jop. 2017. "Bruno Latour, a Veteran of the 'Science Wars,' Has a New Mission." Science Online Interview (October). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq1805.
Wadke, Rahul. 2012. "Mahyco Denies It Sold Its Seeds in Black Market." The Hindu. July 15, 2012. http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/industry-and-economy/agri-biz/article3658632.ece?homepage=true&ref=wl_home.
This Science & Technology Studies website ("Site") is owned and operated by The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies (“Society”), PO Box 117, c/o Otto Auranen, Sepänkatu 4-8 A 16, 33230 Tampere,Finland. The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies and its publication Science & Technology Studies are non-profit organizations.
The Society reserves the right to change, modify, add or remove portions of these Terms and Conditions at its discretion at any time and without prior notice. Please check this page periodically for any modifications. Your continued use of this Site following the posting of any changes will mean that you have accepted the changes.Copyrights and Limitations on Use
All content in this Site, including site layout, design, images, text and other information (collectively, the "Content") is the property of The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies/Science & Technology Studies and is protected by copyright and other intellectual property laws, unless otherwise noted.
You may not copy, display, distribute, modify, publish, reproduce, store, transmit, create derivative works from, or sell or license all or any part of the Content, products or services obtained from this Site in any medium to anyone, except as otherwise expressly permitted under applicable law or as described in these Terms and Conditions or relevant license or subscriber agreement.
You may print or download Content from the Site for academic, your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices. You may not engage in systematic retrieval of Content from the Site to create or compile, directly or indirectly, a collection, compilation, database or directory without prior written permission from Science & Technology Studies.
The Site may contain robot exclusion headers, and by using the Site you agree that you will not use any robots, spiders, crawlers or other automated downloading programs or devices to access, search, index, monitor or copy any Content. The harvesting of postal or email addresses from the Site for purposes of sending unsolicited or unauthorized commercial material, is prohibited. Any questions about whether a particular use is authorized and any requests for permission to publish, reproduce, distribute, display or make derivative works from any Content should be directed to the Science & Technology Studies Assistant Editor.
You may not use the services on the Site to publish or distribute any information (including software or other content) that is illegal; violates or infringes upon the rights of any other person; is abusive, hateful, profane, pornographic, threatening or vulgar; contains errors, viruses or other harmful components; or is otherwise actionable by law. Science & Technology Studies may at any time exercise editorial control over the content of any information or material that is submitted or distributed through its facilities and/or services.
You may not, without the approval of Science & Technology Studies, use the Site to publish or distribute any advertising, promotional material, or solicitation to other users of the Site to use any goods or services. For example (but without limitation), you may not use the Site to conduct any business, to solicit the performance of any activity that is prohibited by law, or to solicit other users to become subscribers of other information services. Similarly, you may not use the Site to download and redistribute public information or shareware for personal gain or use the facilities and/or services to distribute multiple copies of public domain information or shareware.Trademarks
All trademarks appearing on this Site are the property of their respective owners.Links to Other Sites
The Site may contain hyperlinks to other sites or resources that are provided solely for your convenience. Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability of external sites or resources linked to the Site, and does not endorse and is not responsible or liable for any content, advertising, products or other materials on or available from such sites or resources. Transactions that occur between you and any third party are strictly between you and the third party and are not the responsibility of Science & Technology Studies. Due to the fact that Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability or accuracy of these outside resources or their contents, you should review the terms and conditions and privacy policies of these linked sites, as their policies may differ from ours.
Last revised: 10 October 2012