Affect and Effect in Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration
Research across disciplines is often described as beset with problems of epistemological hierarchies and incommensurable categories. We recognize these problems working in two large interdisciplinary research projects on obesity and cholesterol lowering medicine in Denmark. We explore the affective tensions that arise in concrete situations when we meet other researchers around a shared research object. We propose that sensitivity towards such differences, and exploration of the affects they foster, can generate new epistemological and political openings. Analysing four interdisciplinary situations we suggest that embodied experiences of amusement, awkwardness, boredom and doubts are signposts of both differences and connections between people and concerns. Inspired by Haraway’s notion of “response-ability” (1997) and Verran’s concept of “generative critique” (2001) we propose that attention to affective tensions in interdisciplinary research collaboration can be generative of effects not only on modes of collaboration, but also on the ways we engage the world as researchers.
Albert M, Laberge S, Hodges BD, Regehr G and Lingard L (2008) Biomedical scientists' perceptions of the social sciences in health research. Social Science and Medicine 66: 2520–2531.
Balmer AS, Calvert J, Marris C, et al. (2015) Taking Roles in Interdisciplinary Collaborations: Reflections on Working in Post-ELSI Spaces in the UK Synthetic Biology Community. Science and Technology Studies 28(3): 3-25.
Balmer AS, Calvert J, Marris C, et al. (2016) Five rules of thumb for post-ELSI interdisciplinary collaborations. Journal of Responsible Innovation 3(1): 73–80.
Barry A and Born G (2013) Interdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of the Social and Natural Sciences. London: Routledge.
Bennett J (2009) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Blackman L and Venn C (2010) Affect. Body & Society 16(1): 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X09354769
Callard F and Fitzgerald D (2015) Rethinking interdisciplinarity across the Social Sciences and Neurosciences. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Christensen, CL, Wulff HJ, Krasnik A, et al. (2016) LIFESTAT - Living with statins: An interdisciplinary project on the use of statins as a cholesterol-lowering treatment and for cardiovascular risk reduction. Scand J Public Health 44, 534-539.
Elgaard Jensen T (2012) Intervention by Invitation: New Concerns and New Versions of the User in STS. Science Studies 25(1): 13-36.
Fitzgerald D, Littlefield MM, Knudsen KJ, Tonks J and Dietz MJ (2014) Ambivalence, equivocation and the politics of experimental knowledge: A transdisciplinary neuroscience encounter. Social Studies of Science 44(5): 701–721.
Frodeman R, Klein JT, and Mitcham C (2010) The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, et al. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage Publishing.
Gregg M and Seigworth GJ (2010) The Affect Theory Reader, North Carolina: Duke University Press.
Hammersley M and Atkinson P (1995) Ethnography: Principles in Practice (second edition). London: Routledge.
Haraway D (1997) Modest Witness@Second Millennium. FemaleMan Meets OncoMouseTM. London: Routledge.
Hastrup F (2014) Analogue Analysis. Ethnography as Inventive Conversation. Ethnologia Europaea. Journal of European Ethnology 44(2): 48–60.
Hillersdal L, Christensen BJ and Holm L (2016) Changing tastes: learning hunger and fullness after weight-loss surgery. Sociology of Health and Illness VOLUME(ISSUE):pagenumbers. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12504
Hillersdal L, Christensen BJ and Holm L (2015) Patients' strategies for eating after Gastric Bypass Surgery: a qualitative study. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol 70: 523-527. DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2015.212
Jasanoff S (2004) States of knowledge. The Co-production of Science and Social Order. London and New York: Routledge.
Jerak‐Zuiderent S (2015) Keeping open by re‐imagining laughter and fear. The Sociological Review 63: 897-921. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12221
Jespersen AP, MK Petersen, C Ren and M Sandberg (2012) Introduction: Cultural Analysis as Intervention. Science Studies 25(1): 3 – 12.
Jespersen AP, Bønnelycke J and Eriksen HH (2013) Careful Science? Bodywork and Care Practices in Randomised Clinical Trials. Sociology of Health and Illness 35(8):655 – 669.
Kerr A and Garforth L (2016) Affective practices, care and bioscience: a study of two laboratories. The Sociological Review (64): 3–20.
Klein JT (2010) A taxonomy of Interdisciplinarity. In: Frodeman R, Klein JT and Roberto Pacheco RCS (eds): The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, 2nd Edition. Oxford Handbooks. City: Publisher, pp. 15-30.
Larsen MR, Petersen MB, Gram AS, et al. (2017) The GO-ACTIWE randomized controlled trial - An interdisciplinary study designed to investigate the health effects of active commuting and leisure time physical activity. Contemporary Clinical Trials 53(2): 122-129
Lindvig K and Hillersdal L (forthcoming) Strategically unclear? Exploring an excellence programme for interdisciplinary research, (accepted/in press Minerva).
Lupton D (1995) The Imperative of Health. Public Health and the Regulated Body. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Marres N (2009) Testing powers of engagement. Green living experiments, the ontological turn and the undoability of involvement. European Journal of Social Theory 12(1): 117–133.
Marcus GE (1995) Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of Multi-sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 95-117.
Meloni M (2014) How biology became social, and what it means for social theory. The Sociological Review 62(3): 593–614.
Moran J (2010) Interdisciplinarity (2.). London: Routledge.
Morris N and Hebden JC (2008) Evolving Collaborations: A self-referential case-study of a social/natural sciences collaborative project. Science Studies (21):27-46
Myers N (2006) Animating Mechanism: Animations and the Propagation of Affect in the Lively Arts of Protein Modelling. Science & Technology Studies 19(2): 6–30.
Myers N (2008) Embodiments and the Body-work of Modeling in Protein Crystallography. Social Studies of Science 38(2): 163–199.
Nowotny H, Scott P and Gibbons M (2001) Re-thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.
Parker JN and Hackett EJ (2012) Hot spots and hot moments in scientific collaborations and social movements. American Sociological Review 77(1): 21–44.
Pedersen DB, Stjernfelt F and Køppe S (2015) Kampen om disciplinerne: Viden og videnskabelighed i humanistisk forskning. København: Hans Reitzel.
Prainsack B, Svendsen MN, Kock L and Ehrich K (2010) How do we collaborate? Social science researchers' experience of interdisciplinarity in biomedical settings. BioSocieties 5: 278–286.
Rabinow P and Bennett G (2012) Designing Human Practices: An Experiment with Synthetic Biology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Repko AF and Szostak R (2017) Interdisciplinary research process and theory. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Rip A (2009) Futures of ELSA (Science and society series on convergence research). EMBO Reports 10: 666–670
Rose N (2013) The Human Sciences in a Biological Age. Theory, Culture & Society 30(1): 3–34.
Seyfert R (2012) Beyond Personal Feelings and Collective Emotions: Toward a Theory of Social Affect. Theory, Culture & Society 29(6): 27-46.
Star SL and Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19(3): 387–420.
Strathern M (2004) Commons and Borderlands: Working Papers on interdisciplinarity, Accountability and the Flow of Knowledge. Oxford: Sean Kingston Publishing.
Suchman L (2013) Consuming Anthropology. In: Barry A and Born G (eds.) Interdisciplinarity: reconfigurations of the social and natural sciences. London: Routledge, pp. 141–160.
Verran H (1999) Staying true to the laughter in Nigerian classrooms. The Sociological Review 47: 136–156.
Verran H (2001) Science and an African Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
University of Copenhagen (2012). UCPH 2016-Funds Call, June 20th. University of Copenhagen.
Zierhofer W and Burger P (2007) Disentangling Transdisciplinarity: An Analysis of Knowledge Integration in Problem-Oriented Research. Science Studies 20(1): 51-74.
Terms & Conditions
This Science & Technology Studies website ("Site") is owned and operated by The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies (“Society”). The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies and its publication Science & Technology Studies are non-profit organizations.
The Society reserves the right to change, modify, add or remove portions of these Terms and Conditions at its discretion at any time and without prior notice. Please check this page periodically for any modifications. Your continued use of this Site following the posting of any changes will mean that you have accepted the changes.
Copyrights and Limitations on Use
Content in this Site, including site layout, design, images, text and other information (collectively, the "Content") is the property of The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies/Science & Technology Studies and is protected by copyright and other intellectual property laws, unless otherwise noted. This does not include the articles that remain the copyright of the authors.
Content on this website is protected by Creative Commons license CC BY 4.0. This permits users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the published articles. Using and sharing the content is permitted as long as original materials are appropriately credited.
The Site may contain robot exclusion headers, and by using the Site you agree that you will not use any robots, spiders, crawlers or other automated downloading programs or devices to access, search, index, monitor or copy any Content. The harvesting of postal or email addresses from the Site for purposes of sending unsolicited or unauthorized commercial material, is prohibited. Any questions about whether a particular use is authorized and any requests for permission to publish, reproduce, distribute, display or make derivative works from any Content should be directed to the Science & Technology Studies Assistant Editor.
You may not use the services on the Site to publish or distribute any information (including software or other content) that is illegal; violates or infringes upon the rights of any other person; is abusive, hateful, profane, pornographic, threatening or vulgar; contains errors, viruses or other harmful components; or is otherwise actionable by law. Science & Technology Studies may at any time exercise editorial control over the content of any information or material that is submitted or distributed through its facilities and/or services.
You may not, without the approval of Science & Technology Studies, use the Site to publish or distribute any advertising, promotional material, or solicitation to other users of the Site to use any goods or services. For example (but without limitation), you may not use the Site to conduct any business, to solicit the performance of any activity that is prohibited by law, or to solicit other users to become subscribers of other information services. Similarly, you may not use the Site to download and redistribute public information or shareware for personal gain or use the facilities and/or services to distribute multiple copies of public domain information or shareware.
All trademarks appearing on this Site are the property of their respective owners.
Links to Other Sites
The Site may contain hyperlinks to other sites or resources that are provided solely for your convenience. Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability of external sites or resources linked to the Site, and does not endorse and is not responsible or liable for any content, advertising, products or other materials on or available from such sites or resources. Transactions that occur between you and any third party are strictly between you and the third party and are not the responsibility of Science & Technology Studies. Due to the fact that Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability or accuracy of these outside resources or their contents, you should review the terms and conditions and privacy policies of these linked sites, as their policies may differ from ours.
Last revised: 3 Aug 2020