Affect and Effect in Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration

  • Line Hillersdal University of Copenhagen
  • Astrid Pernille Jespersen
  • Bjarke Oxlund
  • Birgitte Bruun

Abstract

Research across disciplines is often described as beset with problems of epistemological hierarchies and incommensurable categories. We recognize these problems working in two large interdisciplinary research projects on obesity and cholesterol lowering medicine in Denmark. We explore the affective tensions that arise in concrete situations when we meet other researchers around a shared research object. We propose that sensitivity towards such differences, and exploration of the affects they foster, can generate new epistemological and political openings. Analysing four interdisciplinary situations we suggest that embodied experiences of amusement, awkwardness, boredom and doubts are signposts of both differences and connections between people and concerns. Inspired by Haraway’s notion of “response-ability” (1997) and Verran’s concept of “generative critique” (2001) we propose that attention to affective tensions in interdisciplinary research collaboration can be generative of effects not only on modes of collaboration, but also on the ways we engage the world as researchers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Line Hillersdal, University of Copenhagen

SAXO Institute,
University of Copenhagen
Karen Blixens Plads 8,
DK - 2300 Copenhagen S

Astrid Pernille Jespersen

SAXO Institute,
University of Copenhagen
Karen Blixens Plads 8,
DK - 2300 Copenhagen S

Bjarke Oxlund

Department of Anthropology

University of Copenhagen

Oester Farimagsgade 5

DK - 1353 Copenhagen K

Birgitte Bruun

Department of Anthropology

University of Copenhagen

Oester Farimagsgade 5

DK - 1353 Copenhagen K

References

Albert M, Laberge S and Hodges BD (2009) Boundary-work in the health research field: Biomedical and clinician scientists' perceptions of social science research. Minerva 47: 171–194.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9120-8

Albert M, Laberge S, Hodges BD, Regehr G and Lingard L (2008) Biomedical scientists' perceptions of the social sciences in health research. Social Science and Medicine 66: 2520–2531.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.052

Balmer AS, Calvert J, Marris C, et al. (2015) Taking Roles in Interdisciplinary Collaborations: Reflections on Working in Post-ELSI Spaces in the UK Synthetic Biology Community. Science and Technology Studies 28(3): 3-25.

Balmer AS, Calvert J, Marris C, et al. (2016) Five rules of thumb for post-ELSI interdisciplinary collaborations. Journal of Responsible Innovation 3(1): 73–80.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2016.1177867

Barry A and Born G (2013) Interdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of the Social and Natural Sciences. London: Routledge.

Bennett J (2009) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391623

Blackman L and Venn C (2010) Affect. Body & Society 16(1): 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X09354769
https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X09354769

Callard F and Fitzgerald D (2015) Rethinking interdisciplinarity across the Social Sciences and Neurosciences. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137407962

Christensen, CL, Wulff HJ, Krasnik A, et al. (2016) LIFESTAT - Living with statins: An interdisciplinary project on the use of statins as a cholesterol-lowering treatment and for cardiovascular risk reduction. Scand J Public Health 44, 534-539.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494816636304

Elgaard Jensen T (2012) Intervention by Invitation: New Concerns and New Versions of the User in STS. Science Studies 25(1): 13-36.

Fitzgerald D, Littlefield MM, Knudsen KJ, Tonks J and Dietz MJ (2014) Ambivalence, equivocation and the politics of experimental knowledge: A transdisciplinary neuroscience encounter. Social Studies of Science 44(5): 701–721.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312714531473

Frodeman R, Klein JT, and Mitcham C (2010) The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, et al. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage Publishing.

Gregg M and Seigworth GJ (2010) The Affect Theory Reader, North Carolina: Duke University Press.

Hammersley M and Atkinson P (1995) Ethnography: Principles in Practice (second edition). London: Routledge.

Haraway D (1997) Modest Witness@Second Millennium. FemaleMan Meets OncoMouseTM. London: Routledge.

Hastrup F (2014) Analogue Analysis. Ethnography as Inventive Conversation. Ethnologia Europaea. Journal of European Ethnology 44(2): 48–60.

Hillersdal L, Christensen BJ and Holm L (2016) Changing tastes: learning hunger and fullness after weight-loss surgery. Sociology of Health and Illness VOLUME(ISSUE):pagenumbers. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12504
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12504

Hillersdal L, Christensen BJ and Holm L (2015) Patients' strategies for eating after Gastric Bypass Surgery: a qualitative study. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol 70: 523-527. DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2015.212
https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2015.212

Jasanoff S (2004) States of knowledge. The Co-production of Science and Social Order. London and New York: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413845

Jerak‐Zuiderent S (2015) Keeping open by re‐imagining laughter and fear. The Sociological Review 63: 897-921. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12221
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12221

Jespersen AP, MK Petersen, C Ren and M Sandberg (2012) Introduction: Cultural Analysis as Intervention. Science Studies 25(1): 3 – 12.
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781009529.00008

Jespersen AP, Bønnelycke J and Eriksen HH (2013) Careful Science? Bodywork and Care Practices in Randomised Clinical Trials. Sociology of Health and Illness 35(8):655 – 669.

Kerr A and Garforth L (2016) Affective practices, care and bioscience: a study of two laboratories. The Sociological Review (64): 3–20.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12310

Klein JT (2010) A taxonomy of Interdisciplinarity. In: Frodeman R, Klein JT and Roberto Pacheco RCS (eds): The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, 2nd Edition. Oxford Handbooks. City: Publisher, pp. 15-30.

Larsen MR, Petersen MB, Gram AS, et al. (2017) The GO-ACTIWE randomized controlled trial - An interdisciplinary study designed to investigate the health effects of active commuting and leisure time physical activity. Contemporary Clinical Trials 53(2): 122-129

Lindvig K and Hillersdal L (forthcoming) Strategically unclear? Exploring an excellence programme for interdisciplinary research, (accepted/in press Minerva).

Lupton D (1995) The Imperative of Health. Public Health and the Regulated Body. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Marres N (2009) Testing powers of engagement. Green living experiments, the ontological turn and the undoability of involvement. European Journal of Social Theory 12(1): 117–133.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431008099647

Marcus GE (1995) Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of Multi-sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 95-117.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523

Meloni M (2014) How biology became social, and what it means for social theory. The Sociological Review 62(3): 593–614.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12151

Moran J (2010) Interdisciplinarity (2.). London: Routledge.

Morris N and Hebden JC (2008) Evolving Collaborations: A self-referential case-study of a social/natural sciences collaborative project. Science Studies (21):27-46

Myers N (2006) Animating Mechanism: Animations and the Propagation of Affect in the Lively Arts of Protein Modelling. Science & Technology Studies 19(2): 6–30.

Myers N (2008) Embodiments and the Body-work of Modeling in Protein Crystallography. Social Studies of Science 38(2): 163–199.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312707082969

Nowotny H, Scott P and Gibbons M (2001) Re-thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.

Parker JN and Hackett EJ (2012) Hot spots and hot moments in scientific collaborations and social movements. American Sociological Review 77(1): 21–44.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411433763

Pedersen DB, Stjernfelt F and Køppe S (2015) Kampen om disciplinerne: Viden og videnskabelighed i humanistisk forskning. København: Hans Reitzel.

Prainsack B, Svendsen MN, Kock L and Ehrich K (2010) How do we collaborate? Social science researchers' experience of interdisciplinarity in biomedical settings. BioSocieties 5: 278–286.
https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2010.7

Rabinow P and Bennett G (2012) Designing Human Practices: An Experiment with Synthetic Biology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226703152.001.0001

Repko AF and Szostak R (2017) Interdisciplinary research process and theory. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Rip A (2009) Futures of ELSA (Science and society series on convergence research). EMBO Reports 10: 666–670
https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2009.149

Rose N (2013) The Human Sciences in a Biological Age. Theory, Culture & Society 30(1): 3–34.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412456569

Seyfert R (2012) Beyond Personal Feelings and Collective Emotions: Toward a Theory of Social Affect. Theory, Culture & Society 29(6): 27-46.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412438591

Star SL and Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19(3): 387–420.
https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001

Strathern M (2004) Commons and Borderlands: Working Papers on interdisciplinarity, Accountability and the Flow of Knowledge. Oxford: Sean Kingston Publishing.

Suchman L (2013) Consuming Anthropology. In: Barry A and Born G (eds.) Interdisciplinarity: reconfigurations of the social and natural sciences. London: Routledge, pp. 141–160.

Verran H (1999) Staying true to the laughter in Nigerian classrooms. The Sociological Review 47: 136–156.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03486.x

Verran H (2001) Science and an African Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

University of Copenhagen (2012). UCPH 2016-Funds Call, June 20th. University of Copenhagen.

Zierhofer W and Burger P (2007) Disentangling Transdisciplinarity: An Analysis of Knowledge Integration in Problem-Oriented Research. Science Studies 20(1): 51-74.
Published
2020-05-14