Diagnosing at Point of Care in South India
coordination work and frictions
Point-of-care testing promises to cut diagnostic and treatment delays by ensuring patients receive a management decision based on a diagnostic test within one encounter with a provider. Adding to STS work on diagnostics and the sociology of diagnosis, this paper examines the work involved in enacting point-of-care testing, how technology features and the embedded assumptions regarding patients. Using focus group discussions with providers and patients in India, the results reveal overlaps, detours and frictions along diagnostic pathways. Diagnosing at point of care requires coordination work by providers and patients and alignment of diagnostic ensembles in which bodies, tools, knowledge, infrastructure, social relations and testing sites mutually configure each other. Patients do not always leave the point of care with one disease or diagnosis. In the process, they are both turned into objects as well as powerful actors. Contributions to STS theory and implications for global health innovation practices are discussed.
Anderson W (2006) The collectors of lost souls. Turning Kuru Scientists into Whitemen Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Angotti N (2010) Working outside of the box: How HIV counselors in Sub-Saharan Africa adapt Western HIV testing norms, Social Science & Medicine 71(5):986-93.
Armstrong N and Hilton P (2014) Doing diagnosis: Whether and how clinicians use a diagnostic tool of uncertain clinical utility, Social Science & Medicine 120:208-14.
Attewell G (2016) Alignments? X-ray Diversions, Haptics, Credibility—With a 'Bone-Setting' Clinic in Hyderabad City, Medical Anthropology 35(1):5-16.
Balarajan Y, Selvaraj S and Subramanian SV (2011) Health care and equity in India, The Lancet 377(9764):505-15.
Bassett IV, Wang B, Chetty S, Mazibuko M, Bearnot B, Giddy J, Lu Z, Losina E, Walensky RP and Freedberg KA (2009) Loss to care and death before antiretroviral therapy in Durban, South Africa, J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 51(2):135-9.
Berg M (1997) Rationalizing medical work: Decision-support techniques and medical practices Cambridge, London: MIT Press.
Bhojani U, Mishra A, Amruthavalli S, Devadasan N, Kolsteren P, De Henauw S and Criel B (2013) Constraints faced by urban poor in managing diabetes care: patients' perspectives from South India, Global Health Action.
Bourret P, Keating P and Cambrosio A (2011) Regulating diagnosis in post-genomic medicine: re-aligning clinical judgment?, Soc Sci Med 73(6):816-24.
Brown P, Lyson M and Jenkins T (2011) From diagnosis to social diagnosis, Social Science & Medicine 73(6):939-43.
Casper MJ and Clarke AE (1998) Making the Pap Smear into the `Right Tool' for the Job: Cervical Cancer Screening in the USA, circa 1940-95, Social Studies of Science 28(2):255-90.
Chandler CI, Mangham L, Njei AN, Achonduh O, Mbacham WF and Wiseman V (2012) 'As a clinician, you are not managing lab results, you are managing the patient': How the enactment of malaria at health facilities in Cameroon compares with new WHO guidelines for the use of malaria tests, Social Science & Medicine 74(10):1528-35.
Clouse K, Page-Shipp L, Dansey H, Moatlhodi B, Scott L, Bassett J, Stevens W, Sanne I and Van Rie A (2012) Implementation of Xpert MTB/RIF for routine point-of-care diagnosis of tuberculosis at the primary care level, S Afr Med J 102(10):805-7.
Cox H and Webster A (2013) Translating biomedical science into clinical practice: Molecular diagnostics and the determination of malignancy, Health 17(4):391-406.
Das J, Holla A, Das V, Mohanan M, Tabak D and Chan B (2012) In Urban And Rural India, A Standardized Patient Study Showed Low Levels Of Provider Training And Huge Quality Gaps, Health Affairs 31(12):2774–84.
Datye V, Kielmann K, Sheikh K, Deshmukh D, Deshpande S, Porter J and Rangan S (2006) Private practitioners' communications with patients around HIV testing in Pune, India, Health Policy and Planning 21(5):343-52.
De Costa A, Johansson E and Diwan VK (2008) Barriers of Mistrust: Public and Private Health Sectors' Perceptions of Each Other in Madhya Pradesh, India, Qualitative Health Research 18(6):756-66.
de Laet M and Mol A (2000) The Zimbabwe Bush Pump: Mechanics of a Fluid Technology, Social Studies of Science 30(2):225-63.
de Swaan A (1977) On the Sociogenesis of the Psychoanalytic Situation, Human Figurations, Essays for Norbert Elias, Amsterdams Sociologisch Tijdschrift.
De Vries G (2008) 'The 'unknown' practice of genetic testing', in G. De Vries and K. Horstman (eds), Genetics from laboratory to society: Societal learning as an alternative to regulation New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 1-16.
De Vries G and Horstman K (eds) (2008) Genetics from laboratory to society: Societal learning as an alternative to regulation (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
Engel N (2012) New diagnostics for multi-drug resistant Tuberculosis in India: Innovating control and controlling innovation, BioSocieties 7(1):50-71.
Engel N, Ganesh G, Patil M, Yellappa V, Vadnais C, Pai N and Pai M (2015) Point-of-care testing in India: missed opportunities to realize the true potential of point-of-care testing programs, BMC Health Services Research 15(1):550.
Engel N and van Lente H (2014) Organisational innovation and control practices: the case of public–private mix in tuberculosis control in India, Sociology of Health & Illness 36(6):917-31.
Fochsen G, Deshpande K, Ringsberg KC and Thorson A (2009) Conflicting accountabilities: Doctor's dilemma in TB control in rural India, Health POlicy 89(2):160-67.
Gardner J, Dew K, Stubbe M, Dowell T and Macdonald L (2011) Patchwork diagnoses: The production of coherence, uncertainty, and manageable bodies, Social Science & Medicine 73(6):843-50.
George A and Iyer A (2013) Unfree markets: Socially embedded informal health providers in northern Karnataka, India, Social Science & Medicine 96(0):297-304.
Graham J (2006) 'Diagnosing Dementia: Epidemiological and clinical data as cultural text', in A. Leibing and L. Cohen (eds), Thinking about dementia: Culture, loss and the anthropology of senility New Jersey: Rutgers University Press: 80-105.
Jensen TE (2012) Intervention by Invitation: New Concerns and New Versions of the User in STS, Science Studies 25(1):13-36.
Jovanovic M (2014) Creating the 'dis-ease' of high cholesterol: A sociology of diagnosis reception analysis, Social Science & Medicine 101(0):120-28.
Jutel A (2009) Sociology of diagnosis: a preliminary review, Sociology of Health & Illness 31(2):278-99.
Jutel A and Lupton D (2015) Digitizing diagnosis: a review of mobile applications in the diagnostic process, Diagnosis 2(2):89.
Jutel A and Nettleton S (2011) Towards a sociology of diagnosis: Reflections and opportunities, Social Science & Medicine 73(6):793-800.
Kielmann K, Datye V, Pradhan A and Rangan S (2014) Balancing authority, deference and trust across the public-private divide in health care: tuberculosis health visitors in western Maharashtra, India, Glob Public Health 9(8):975-92.
Latimer J (1997) Giving patients a future: the constituting of classes in an acute medical unit, Sociology of Health & Illness 19(2):160-85.
Losina E, Bassett IV, Giddy J, Chetty S, Regan S, Walensky RP, Ross D, Scott CA, Uhler LM, Katz JN, Holst H and Freedberg KA (2010) The "ART" of Linkage: Pre-Treatment Loss to Care after HIV Diagnosis at Two PEPFAR Sites in Durban, South Africa, PLoS ONE 5(3):e9538.
Mol A (2002) The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice Durham, London: Duke University Press.
Mueller-Rockstroh B (2007) 'Ultrasound Travels: The Politics of a Medical Technology in Ghana and Tanzania', in, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, Department of Technology & Society Studies Maastricht: Doctoral Dissertation, University of Maastricht.
Müller-Rockstroh B (2011) Appropriate and Appropriated Technology: Lessons Learned from Ultrasound in Tanzania, Medical Anthropology 31(3):196-212.
Mykhalovskiy E, McCoy L and Bresalier M (2004) Compliance/Adherence, HIV, and the Critique of Medical Power, Social Theory & Health 2(4):315-40.
Pant Pai N, Vadnais C, Denkinger C, Engel N and Pai M (2012) Point-of-Care Testing for Infectious Diseases: Diversity, Complexity, and Barriers in Low- And Middle-Income Countries, PLoS Med 9(9):e1001306.
Pasveer B (1989) Knowledge of shadows: the introduction of X-ray images in medicine, Sociology of Health & Illness 11(4):360-81.
Peeling RW and Mabey D (2010) Point-of-care tests for diagnosing infections in the developing world, Clin. Micriobiol. Infect. 16:1062-69.
Prasad A (2014) Imperial Technoscience: Transnational Histories of MRI in the United States, Britain and India: MIT Press.
Redfield P (2016) Fluid technologies: The Bush Pump, the LifeStraw® and microworlds of humanitarian design, Social Studies of Science 46(2):159-83.
Salter CI, Howe A, McDaid L, Blacklock J, Lenaghan E and Shepstone L (2011) Risk, significance and biomedicalisation of a new population: older women's experience of osteoporosis screening, Soc Sci Med 73(6):808-15.
Schubert C (2011) Making sure. A comparative micro-analysis of diagnostic instruments in medical practice, Social Science & Medicine 73(6):851-57.
Scott K and Shanker S (2010) Tying their hands? Institutional obstacles to the success of the ASHA community health worker programme in rural north India, AIDS Care 22 Suppl 2:1606-12.
Sengupta A and Nundy S (2005) The private health sector in India, bmj 331(7526):1157-58.
Squire SB, Belaye AK, Kashoti A, Salaniponi FM, Mundy CJ, Theobald S and Kemp J (2005) 'Lost' smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis cases: where are they and why did we lose them?, INT J TUBERC LUNG DIS 9(1):25-31.
Sreeramareddy CT, Qin ZZ, Satyanarayana S, Subbaraman R and Pai M (2014) Delays in diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in India: a systematic review, INT J TUBERC LUNG DIS 18(3):255-66.
Street A (2011) Artefacts of not-knowing: The medical record, the diagnosis and the production of uncertainty in Papua New Guinean biomedicine, Social Studies of Science 41(6):815-34.
Suchman L (2002) Located accountabilities in technology production, Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 14(2):91-105.
Yellappa V, Battaglioli T, Gurum SK, Narayanan D and Van der Stuyft P (2016) Private practitioners' contributions to the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme in a South Indian district, The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 20(5):659-65.
This Science & Technology Studies website ("Site") is owned and operated by The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies (“Society”), PO Box 117, c/o Otto Auranen, Sepänkatu 4-8 A 16, 33230 Tampere,Finland. The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies and its publication Science & Technology Studies are non-profit organizations.
The Society reserves the right to change, modify, add or remove portions of these Terms and Conditions at its discretion at any time and without prior notice. Please check this page periodically for any modifications. Your continued use of this Site following the posting of any changes will mean that you have accepted the changes.Copyrights and Limitations on Use
All content in this Site, including site layout, design, images, text and other information (collectively, the "Content") is the property of The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies/Science & Technology Studies and is protected by copyright and other intellectual property laws, unless otherwise noted.
You may not copy, display, distribute, modify, publish, reproduce, store, transmit, create derivative works from, or sell or license all or any part of the Content, products or services obtained from this Site in any medium to anyone, except as otherwise expressly permitted under applicable law or as described in these Terms and Conditions or relevant license or subscriber agreement.
You may print or download Content from the Site for academic, your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices. You may not engage in systematic retrieval of Content from the Site to create or compile, directly or indirectly, a collection, compilation, database or directory without prior written permission from Science & Technology Studies.
The Site may contain robot exclusion headers, and by using the Site you agree that you will not use any robots, spiders, crawlers or other automated downloading programs or devices to access, search, index, monitor or copy any Content. The harvesting of postal or email addresses from the Site for purposes of sending unsolicited or unauthorized commercial material, is prohibited. Any questions about whether a particular use is authorized and any requests for permission to publish, reproduce, distribute, display or make derivative works from any Content should be directed to the Science & Technology Studies Assistant Editor.
You may not use the services on the Site to publish or distribute any information (including software or other content) that is illegal; violates or infringes upon the rights of any other person; is abusive, hateful, profane, pornographic, threatening or vulgar; contains errors, viruses or other harmful components; or is otherwise actionable by law. Science & Technology Studies may at any time exercise editorial control over the content of any information or material that is submitted or distributed through its facilities and/or services.
You may not, without the approval of Science & Technology Studies, use the Site to publish or distribute any advertising, promotional material, or solicitation to other users of the Site to use any goods or services. For example (but without limitation), you may not use the Site to conduct any business, to solicit the performance of any activity that is prohibited by law, or to solicit other users to become subscribers of other information services. Similarly, you may not use the Site to download and redistribute public information or shareware for personal gain or use the facilities and/or services to distribute multiple copies of public domain information or shareware.Trademarks
All trademarks appearing on this Site are the property of their respective owners.Links to Other Sites
The Site may contain hyperlinks to other sites or resources that are provided solely for your convenience. Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability of external sites or resources linked to the Site, and does not endorse and is not responsible or liable for any content, advertising, products or other materials on or available from such sites or resources. Transactions that occur between you and any third party are strictly between you and the third party and are not the responsibility of Science & Technology Studies. Due to the fact that Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability or accuracy of these outside resources or their contents, you should review the terms and conditions and privacy policies of these linked sites, as their policies may differ from ours.
Last revised: 10 October 2012