The One-Dimensionality of Scientific Relativism

  • János Laki Institute of Philosophy, Research Centre for the Humanities, Hungarian Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The historicist approach to science has been accompanied by a spatial one in the last decade or two. Referring to the cultural origin of the fundamental standards, advocates of the “geographical turn” claim that “just as there is a rich history of science, so there is a rich geography of science” (Withers and Livingstone, 2011: 3). The emerging localism is perpendicular to the old historical segmentation and the combination of the two present science as a bunch of quasi-independent cognitive endeavours scattered in time and space. Taking the debate about the existence of the N-ray as an instructive example, I argue that by developing location-independent disciplinary communities, history made the community-structure of science culturally unique. Different historical eras may use incompatible concepts, methodological norms, and epistemological standards, but as this diversity does not extend onto its synchronous dimension, relativism remains one-dimensional in science.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ashmore M (1993) The Theatre of the Blind: Starring a Promethean Prankster, a Phoney Phenomenon, a Prism, a Pocket, and a Piece of Wood. Social Studies of Science 23(1): 67-106.
https://doi.org/10.1177/030631293023001003

Baghramian M (2004) Relativism. London and New York: Routledge.

Barnes B and Bloor D (1982) Relativism, Rationalism and the Sociology of Knowledge. In: Hollis M and Lukes S (eds) Rationality and Relativism. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press, pp. 21-47.

Blondlot RM (1904) Explanations and statements concerning N-Rays: A replay to Prof. Wood. Scientific American 151(1): 24211.
https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican12171904-24211supp

Blondlot RM (1905a) "N" Rays. A Collection of Papers Communicated to the Academy of Sciences. (transl. Garcin J). New York and Bombay: Longmans, Green, & Co.

Blondlot RM (1905b) How the Action of "N" Rays should be observed. In: Blondlot (1905a) "N" Rays. A Collection of Papers Communicated to the Academy of Sciences (transl. Garcin J), New York and Bombay: Longmans, Green, & Co, pp. 82-83.

Bloor D (1976) Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge and Keagan Paul.

Bloor D (1999) Anti-Latour. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 30(1): 81-112.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(98)00038-7

Boghossian PA (2006) Fear of Knowledge. Against Relativism and Constructivism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199287185.001.0001

Burke JB (1904a) The Blondlot n-Rays. Nature 69(1790): 365.

Burke JB (1904b) The Blondlot n-Rays. Nature 70(1809): 198.

Cartwright N (1999) The Dappled World. A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: The Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167093

Coliva A and Pedersen NJLL (eds) (2017) Epistemic pluralism. Palgrave Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65460-7

Collins HM (1992 [1985]) Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Collins HM (2004) Interactional expertise as a third kind of knowledge. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3(2): 125-143.
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHEN.0000040824.89221.1a

Collins HM, Evans R and Gorman M (2007) Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise. In: Collins (ed.) Case Studies of Expertise and Experience: special issue of Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 38, 4, 657-666.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.09.003

Collins HM and Evans R (2015) Expertise revisited, Part I. – Interactional expertise. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 54 113-123.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.07.004

Collins HM and Evans R (2016) Expertise revisited, Part II. – Contributory expertise. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. 56 103-110.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.07.003

Collins et al (forthcoming) Trading zones revisited.

Crespel A. and Gélisse Ph (2005) Atlas of Electroencephalography: Awake and Sleep EEG: Activation Procedures and Artifacts. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext.

Daston L and Galison P (2007) Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.

Discussion on N-Rays (1905) Report of the seventy-fourth meeting of the British Association for the advancement of science. London: John Murray, 467-468.

Drori GS, Meyer JW, Ramirez FO and Schofer E (eds) (2003) Science in the Modern World Polity: Institutionalization and Globalization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Dupré J (1993) The Disorder of Things. Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, MA – London: Harvard University Press.

Galison P (1997a) Image and Logic. A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Galison P (1997b) Material Culture, Theoretical Culture and Delocalization. In: Krige J and Pestre D (eds.) Science in the Twentieth Century. Amsterdam: Harwood, pp. 669-682.

Galison P (1999) Trading Zone: Coordinating Action and Belief. In: Biagioli M (ed) The Science Studies Reader. New York: Routledge, pp. 137-160.

Galison P (2010) Trading with the Enemy. In: Gorman M E (ed) Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 25-52.
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014724.003.0003

Golinski J (1998) Making Natural Knowledge. Constructivism and the History of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gorman ME (2002) Levels of Expertise and Trading Zones: A Framework for Multidisciplinary Collaboration. Social Studies of Science 32(5/6): 933-938.
https://doi.org/10.1177/030631270203200511

Henke CR and Gieryn TF (2008) Sites of Scientific Practice: The Enduring Importance of Place. In: Hackett EJ, Amsterdamska O, Lynch M and Wajchman J (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge, MA – London: The MIT Press, pp. 353 – 376.

Hooker SJ (1904) Human and plant rays. The Lancet. 1904 March: 686.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)72903-0

Klotz IM (1980) The N-ray Affair. Scientific American 242 May: 168-175.
https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0580-168

Klotz IM (1986) Great Discoveries Not Mentioned in Textbooks: N Rays. In: Klotz IM Diamond Dealers and Feather Merchants. Tales from the Sciences. New York: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3529-8_3

Knorr-Cetina KD (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge. An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Kohler RE (2002) Place and Practice in Field Biology. History of Science 40(2): 189-210.
https://doi.org/10.1177/007327530204000204

Krausz M (2011) Varieties of Relativism and the Reach of Reasons in Companion In: Hales SD (ed) A Companion to Relativism, Wiley – Blackwell, pp. 70-84.

Kusch M (2017) Epistemic relativism, scepticism, pluralism. Synthese 194: 4687-4703
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1041-0

Langmuir I (1989) Pathological Science. Physics Today 42(10): 36–48.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.881205

Livingstone DN (2003) Putting Science in its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226487243.001.0001

Longino HE (2002) The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Lummer O (1904a) Berliner Ophtamologische Gesellschaft. Sitzung vom 18. Februar 1904. Zeitschrift für Augenheilkunde 11: 279-280. Available at: www.karger.de/Article/Pdf/290155 (accessed 22 July 2014).

Lummer O (1904b) Blondlot's n-Ray Experiments. Nature 69(1790): 378-380.

Lummer O and Weiss P (eds) (1904) N-Srahlen. Physikalische Zeitschrift 5(21): 674-677.

McKenna R (2017) Pluralism about knowledge. In: Coliva A and Pedersen NJLL (eds) (2017) Epistemic pluralism. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 171-199.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65460-7_7

Nappi C (2013) The Global and Beyond. Adventures in the Local Historiographies of Science. Isis 104(1): 102-110.
https://doi.org/10.1086/669894

Nye MJ (1980) N–Rays: An Episode in the History and Psychology of Science. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 11(1): 125-156.
https://doi.org/10.2307/27757473

Nye MJ (1986) Science in the Provinces: Scientific Communities and Provincial Leadership in France, 1860–1930. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.

Ophir A and Shapin S (1991) The Place of Knowledge: A Methodological Survey. Science in Context 4(1): 3-21.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889700000132

Powell RC (2007) Geographies of science: histories, localities, practices, futures. Progress in Human Geography 31(3): 309-329.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507077081

Pritchard D (2016) Epistemic Angst. Radical skepticism and the groundlessness of our believing. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400873913

Schenk CC (1904) Blondlot's the N-rays. Nature 69(1795): 486-487.
https://doi.org/10.1038/069486d0

Schofer E (2004) Cross-National Differences in the Expansion of Science 1970-1990. Social Forces 83(1): 215-248.
https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2004.0125

Scientific American (1904) The N-Rays: Are they real or illusory? Scientific American, June 04, 434.

Seabrook W (1941) Doctor Wood: A Modern Wizard of the Laboratory. New York: Harcourt, Brace & C.

Seidel M (2014) Epistemic relativism. A constructive critique. Palgrave and Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137377890

Shapin S (1998) Placing the View from Nowhere: Historical and Sociological Problems in the Location of Science. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 23(1): 5-12.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-2754.1998.00005.x

Siegel H (2011) Epistemological Relativism: Arguments Pro and Con. In: Hales SD (ed) A Companion to Relativism. Chicester, Malden Ma: Wiley–Blackwell, pp.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444392494.ch11

Swinton CAA (1904) The Blondlot N-rays. Nature 69(1792): 412.
https://doi.org/10.1038/069412a0

Turnbull D (1996) Cartography and Science in Early Modern Europe: Mapping the Construction of Knowledge Spaces. Imago Mundi 48(1): 5-24.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03085699608592830

Turnbull D (2002) Travelling knowledge: narratives, assemblage and encounters. In: Bourguet MN, Licoppe C and Sibum HO (eds.) Instruments, Travel and Science. Itineraries of precision from the seventeenth to the twentieth century. London and New York: Routledge, 273-294.

Watson-Verran H and Turnbull D (1995) Science and Other Indigenous Knowledge Systems. In: Jasanoff S, Markle GE, Petersen JC and Pinch T (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications, pp. 115 – 139.

Williams M (2007) Why (Wittgensteinian) Contextualism is not Relativism, Episteme 4(1): 93-114.
https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2007.4.1.93

Withers C and DN Livingstone (2011) Thinking Geographically about Nineteenth-Century Science. In: Livingstone DN and Withers C (eds) Geographies of Nineteenth-Century Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 1-20.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226487298.003.0001

Wood RW (1904) The N-rays. Nature 70(1822) (29 Sept.): 530-531.
Published
2019-02-15
Section
Research Papers