Programming Visuals, Visualising Programs
This article examines the role of visualisations in astrophysics programming work, showing that visualisations are not only outputs for those producing them, but can help those developing them understand how to do their work. Studies of visualization in programming have mainly been of social and cultural factors influencing scientific research. We concentrate on the material aspects of scientific work, as of interest in their own right and on methodological grounds (since capturing the material practices of computer screen-work is an underexplored area). Using a ‘video-aided ethnographic’ method we analyse an episode of computational astrophysics involving the use of the Python programming language. We identify a selection of activities comprising the screen work of an astrophysics researcher to unpack how those activities contribute to the production of scientific knowledge.
Alač M (2011) Handling Digital Brains: A Laboratory Study of Multimodal Semiotic Interaction in the Age of Computers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Amann K & Knorr Cetina K (1990) The Fixation of (Visual) Evidence. In: Lynch M and Woolgar S (eds) Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 85-121.
Bezemer J, Cope A, Kress G & Kneebone R (2011) "Do You Have Another Johan?" Negotiating Meaning in the Operating Theatre. Applied Linguistics Review 2: 313-334.
Bijker EM, Sauerwein RW & Bijker WE (2016) Controlled Human Malaria Infection Trials: How Tandems of Trust and Control Construct Scientific Knowledge. Social Studies of Science 46(1): 56-86.
Brown B & Laurier E (2005) Designing Electronic Maps: An Ethnographic Approach. In: Meng L, Zipf A and Reichenbacher T (eds) Map-Based Mobile Services. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 241-257.
Bruun H & Sierla S (2008) Distributed Problem Solving in Software Development: The Case of an Automation Project. Social Studies of Science 38(1): 133-158.
Burri RV & Dumit J (2008) Social Studies of Scientific Imaging and Visualization. In: Hackett EJ, Amsterdamska O, Lynch M and Wajcman J (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Third Edition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 297-318.
Carusi A (2008) Scientific Visualisations and Aesthetic Grounds for Trust. Ethics and Information Technology 10(4): 243-254.
Carusi A (2011) Computational Biology and the Limits of Shared Vision. Perspectives on Science 19(3): 300-336.
Carusi A, Novakovic G and Webmoor T (2010) Are Digital Picturings Representations? In: Electronic Visualisation and the Arts, London, UK, 5-7 July 2010: 174-184. Available at: http://www.bcs.org/upload/pdf/ewic_ev10_s7paper2.pdf (accessed 3.3.2017).
Collins H (1992) Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. London: SAGE.
Coopmans C (2006) Making Mammograms Mobile: Suggestions for a Sociology of Data Mobility. Information, Communication & Society 9(1): 1-19.
Coopmans C (2011) 'Face Value': New Medical Imaging Software in Commercial View. Social Studies of Science 41: 155-176.
Coulter, J & Parsons ED (1990) The Praxiology of Perception: Visual Orientations and Practical Action. Inquiry 33: 251-272.
Daipha P (2010) Visual Perception at Work: Lessons from the World of Meteorology. Poetics 38: 150-164.
Davis PJ & Hersh R (1981) The Mathematical Experience. Boston: Birkhauser.
Garfinkel H (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Garfinkel H, Lynch M & Livingston E (1981) The Work of a Discovering Science Construed with Materials from the Optically Discovered Pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11(2): 131-158.
Goodwin C (1994) Professional Vision. American Anthropologist 96(3): 606-633.
Goodwin C (2001) Practices of Seeing Visual Analysis: An Ethnomethodological Approach. In: Van Leeuwen T and Jewitt C (eds) Handbook of Visual Analysis. London: Sage, 157-182.
Götschel H (2011) The Entanglement of Gender and Physics: Human Actors, Work Place Cultures, and Knowledge Production. Science Studies 24(1): 66-80.
Hine C (2006) Databases as Scientific Instruments and their Role in the Ordering of Scientific Work. Social Studies of Science 36: 269-298.
Hoeppe G (2012) Astronomers at the Observatory: Place, Visual Practice, Traces. Anthropological Quarterly 85(4): 1141-1160.
Hoeppe G (2014) Working Data Together: The Accountability and Reflexivity of Digital Astronomical Practice. Social Studies of Science 44(2): 243-270.
Kettenis M, Van Langevelde HJ, Reynolds C & Cotton B (2005) ParselTongue: AIPS Talking Python. In: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XV, San Lorenzo de El Escorial, Spain, 2-5 October 2005: 497-500. Available at: http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?2006ASPC..351..497K&data_type=PDF_HIGH&whole_paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf (accessed 3.3.2017).
Knorr Cetina K (2003) From Pipes to Scopes: The Flow Architecture of Financial Markets. Distinktion 7: 7-23.
Knuuttila T (2006) From Representation to Production: Parsers and Parsing in Language Technology. In: Lenhard J, Küppers G and Shinn T (eds) Simulation: Pragmatic Construction of Reality. Dordrecht: Springer, 41-55.
Knuuttila T & Boon M (2011) How Do Models Give Us Knowledge? The Case of Carnot's Ideal Heat Engine. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1(3): 309-334.
Knuuttila T, Merz M & Mattila E (2006) Editorial: Computer Models and Simulations in Scientific Practice. Science Studies 19(1): 3-11.
Larivière V, Desrochers N, Macaluso B, Mongeon P, Paul-Hus A & Sugimoto CR (2016) Contributorship and Division of Labor in Knowledge Production. Social Studies of Science 46(3): 417-435.
Lindwall O (2008) Lab Work in Science Education: Instruction, Inscription, and the Practical Achievement of Understanding. Linköping: Linköping University Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Louvel S (2012) The 'Industrialization' of Doctoral Training? A Study of the Experiences of Doctoral Students and Supervisors in the French Life Sciences. Science & Technology Studies 25(2): 23-45.
Lynch M (1985) Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory. London: Routledge.
Lynch M (1988) The Externalized Retina: Selection and Mathematization in the Visual Documentation of Objects in the Life Sciences. Human Studies 11(3): 201-234.
Lynch M (2011) Image and Imagination: An Exploration of Online Nano-Galleries. In: Visualisation in the Age of Computerisation, Oxford, UK, 25-26 March.
Lynch M & Edgerton SY (1988) Aesthetics and Digital Image Processing: Representational Craft in Contemporary Astronomy. In: Fyfe G and Law J (eds) Picturing Power: Visual Depiction and Social Relations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 184-220.
Martin D & Rooksby J (2006) Knowledge and Reasoning About Code in a Large Code Base. TeamEthno-online, 2: 3-12, https://archive.cs.st-andrews.ac.uk/STSE-Handbook/Other/Team%20Ethno/Issue2/Martin.pdf (accessed 3.3.2017).
Messeri L (2017) Extra-Terra Incognita: Martian Maps in the Digital Age. Social Studies of Science 47(1): 75-94.
Merz M (2006) Locating the Dry Lab on the Lab Map. In: Lenhard J, Küppers G and Shinn T (eds) Simulation: Pragmatic Construction of Reality. Dordrecht: Springer, 155-172.
Mulinari S, Holmberg T & Ideland M (2015) Money, Money, Money? Politico-Moral Discourses of Stem Cell Research in a Grant Allocation Process. Science & Technology Studies 28(2): 53-72.
Pettersson H (2011) Making Masculinity in Plasma Physics: Machines, Labour and Experiments. Science Studies 24(1): 47-65.
Pickering A (ed) (1992) Science as Practice and Culture. London: The University of Chicago Press.
Rall D (2006) The 'House That Dick Built': Constructing the Team that Built the Bomb. Social Studies of Science 36: 943-957.
Rooksby J, Martin D & Rouncefield M (2006) Reading as Part of Computer Programming. An Ethnomethodological Enquiry. In: Proceedings of the 18th Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group (ed P Romero, J Good, EA Chaparro and S Bryant), Sussex, UK, 7-8 September 2006: 198-212. Salford: Psychology of Programming Interest Group. Available at: http://www.ppig.org/papers/18th-rooksby.pdf (accessed 3.3.2017).
Ruivenkamp M & Rip A (2010) Visualizing the Invisible Nanoscale Study: Visualization Practices in Nanotechnology Community of Practice. Science Studies 23(1): 3-36.
Slack R, Hartswood M, Procter R & Rouncefield M (2007) Cultures of Reading: On Professional Vision and the Lived Work of Mammography. In: Hester S and Francis D (eds) Orders of Ordinary Action: Respecifying Sociological Knowledge. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 175-193.
Sloan Digital Sky Survey (2013) Mapping the Universe. Available at: www.sdss.org (accessed 3.3.2017).
Sormani P (2014) Respecifying Lab Ethnography: An Ethnomethodological Study of Experimental Physics. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
Spencer M (2012) Image and Practice: Visualization in Computational Fluid Dynamics Research. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 37(1): 86-100.
Suchman LA (1994) Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human Machine Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sundberg M (2010) Organizing Simulation Code Collectives. Science Studies 23(1): 37-57.
Vertesi J (2012) Seeing Like a Rover: Visualization, Embodiment, and Interaction on the Mars Exploration Rover Mission. Social Studies of Science 42: 393-414.
Vertesi J (2015) Seeing Like a Rover: How Robots, Team, and Images Craft Knowledge of Mars. London: The University of Chicago Press.
Voskuhl A (2004) Humans, Machines and Conversations: An Ethnographic Study of the Making of Automatic Speech Recognition Technologies. Social Studies of Science 34: 393-421.
Wittgenstein L (1974) Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell & Mott, Ltd.
This Science & Technology Studies website ("Site") is owned and operated by The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies (“Society”), PO Box 117, c/o Otto Auranen, Sepänkatu 4-8 A 16, 33230 Tampere,Finland. The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies and its publication Science & Technology Studies are non-profit organizations.
The Society reserves the right to change, modify, add or remove portions of these Terms and Conditions at its discretion at any time and without prior notice. Please check this page periodically for any modifications. Your continued use of this Site following the posting of any changes will mean that you have accepted the changes.Copyrights and Limitations on Use
All content in this Site, including site layout, design, images, text and other information (collectively, the "Content") is the property of The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies/Science & Technology Studies and is protected by copyright and other intellectual property laws, unless otherwise noted.
You may not copy, display, distribute, modify, publish, reproduce, store, transmit, create derivative works from, or sell or license all or any part of the Content, products or services obtained from this Site in any medium to anyone, except as otherwise expressly permitted under applicable law or as described in these Terms and Conditions or relevant license or subscriber agreement.
You may print or download Content from the Site for academic, your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices. You may not engage in systematic retrieval of Content from the Site to create or compile, directly or indirectly, a collection, compilation, database or directory without prior written permission from Science & Technology Studies.
The Site may contain robot exclusion headers, and by using the Site you agree that you will not use any robots, spiders, crawlers or other automated downloading programs or devices to access, search, index, monitor or copy any Content. The harvesting of postal or email addresses from the Site for purposes of sending unsolicited or unauthorized commercial material, is prohibited. Any questions about whether a particular use is authorized and any requests for permission to publish, reproduce, distribute, display or make derivative works from any Content should be directed to the Science & Technology Studies Assistant Editor.
You may not use the services on the Site to publish or distribute any information (including software or other content) that is illegal; violates or infringes upon the rights of any other person; is abusive, hateful, profane, pornographic, threatening or vulgar; contains errors, viruses or other harmful components; or is otherwise actionable by law. Science & Technology Studies may at any time exercise editorial control over the content of any information or material that is submitted or distributed through its facilities and/or services.
You may not, without the approval of Science & Technology Studies, use the Site to publish or distribute any advertising, promotional material, or solicitation to other users of the Site to use any goods or services. For example (but without limitation), you may not use the Site to conduct any business, to solicit the performance of any activity that is prohibited by law, or to solicit other users to become subscribers of other information services. Similarly, you may not use the Site to download and redistribute public information or shareware for personal gain or use the facilities and/or services to distribute multiple copies of public domain information or shareware.Trademarks
All trademarks appearing on this Site are the property of their respective owners.Links to Other Sites
The Site may contain hyperlinks to other sites or resources that are provided solely for your convenience. Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability of external sites or resources linked to the Site, and does not endorse and is not responsible or liable for any content, advertising, products or other materials on or available from such sites or resources. Transactions that occur between you and any third party are strictly between you and the third party and are not the responsibility of Science & Technology Studies. Due to the fact that Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability or accuracy of these outside resources or their contents, you should review the terms and conditions and privacy policies of these linked sites, as their policies may differ from ours.
Last revised: 10 October 2012