The Physiology of Imagined Publics
From a Deficit to an Ambivalence Model
This paper draws on the concept of imagined lay persons (ILP) to investigate how scientists working in the fields of bio- and nanotechnology perceive the public and how these imaginaries facilitate or hinder engagement activities. Scientists construct imaginaries of publics that shape the ways in which they address the public, perceive the benefits of public engagement activities, and form communication strategies. Moreover, the paper argues that scientists’ accounts of the public are characterised by ambivalence regarding what the public is, the public’s knowledge and the public’s ability to take part in scientific processes. Thus, the paper proposes a more comprehensive approach to understanding ILPs than provided by previous studies, which have focused on the attribution of knowledge deficits and related fears of protest and resistance.
Barnett J, Burningham K, Walker G & Cass N (2012) Imagined Publics and Engagement Around Renewable Energy Technologies in the UK. Public Understanding of Science 21(1): 36–50. doi: 10.1177/0963662510365663.
Bauer MW (2009) The Evolution of Public Understanding of Science – Discourse and Comparative Evidence. Science Technology and Society 14(2): 221–240. doi: 10.1177/097172180901400202.
Besley JC & Nisbet M (2013) How Scientists View the Public, the Media and the Political Process. Public Understanding of Science 22(6): 644–659. doi: 10.1177/0963662511418743.
Bijker WE (1995) Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bijker WE & Law J (1992) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Borup M, Brown N, Konrad K & Van Lente H (2006) The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18(3–4): 285–298. doi: 10.1080/09537320600777002.
Bucchi M (1998) Science and the Media: Alternative Routes in Scientific Communication. London & New York: Routledge.
Charmaz, K (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory. London: Sage Publication
European Commission (2010) Biotechnology: Special Eurobarometer. Bruxelles: European Commission.
European Comission (2016) Responsible research & innovation. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation (accessed 5.12.2016).
Felt U, Barben D, Irwin A, Joly P-B, Rip A, Stirling A & Stöckelová T (2013). Science in Society: Caring for our Futures in Turbulent Times. Science Policy Briefing. European Science Foundation.
Felt U & Wynne B (2007) Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate: Directorate General for Research.
Gieryn, T. (1983) Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6): 781-795.
Gottweis H, Chen HD & Starkbaum J (2011) Biobanks and the Phantom Public. Human Genetics 130(3): 433–440. doi: 10.1007/s00439-011-1065-y.
Heidenreich S (2015) Sublime Technology and Object of Fear: Offshore Wind Scientists Assessing Publics. Environment and Planning A 47(5): 1047–1062.
Irwin, A (2001) Constructing the Scientific Citizen: Science and Democracy in the Biosciences. Public Understanding of Science 10(1): 1–18.
Irwin, A (2014) From Deficit to Democracy (Re-Visited). Public Understanding of Science 23(1): 71–76.
Irwin A & Michael M (2003) Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Irwin A & Wynne B (1996) Misunderstanding Science?: The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jasanoff S & Kim S-H (2009) Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47(2): 119–146. doi: 10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4.
Kjølberg K (2009) Representations of Nanotechnology in Norwegian Newspapers – Implications for Public Participation. Nanoethics 3:1: 61-72
Latour B (1999) Pandoras Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press
Latour B (2004) Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry 30(2): 225–248. doi: doi:10.1086/421123.
Latour B (2005) From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik. In: Latour B & Weibel P (eds) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge & London: MIT Press.
Latour B (2008) What is the Style of Matters of Concern? Two Lectures in Empirical Philosophy. Amsterdam: Van Gorcum.
Lie M & Sørensen KH (1996) Making Technology Our Own? Domesticating Technology into Everday Life. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
Lippmann W (1925) The Phantom Public. New York: Harcourt.
Maranta A, Guggenheim M, Gisler P & Pohl C (2003). The Reality of Experts and the Imagined Lay Person. Acta Sociologica 46(2): 150–165. doi: 10.1177/0001699303046002005.
Marres N (2005) Issues Spark a Public into Being. In: Latour B & Weibel P (eds) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge & London: MIT Press.
Marres N (2007) The Issues Deserve More Credit: Pragmatist Contributions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy. Social Studies of Science 37(5): 759–780.
Marris C (2015) The construction of Imaginaries of the Public as a Threat to Synthetic Biology. Science as Culture 24 (1): 83-98.
Merton RK (1976) Sociological Ambivalence and Other Essays. New York: Free Press.
Nowotny H, Scott P & Gibbons M (2003) "Mode 2" Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge. Minerva 41 (3): 179-194
Nydal R, Myhr AL, Myskja B (2016) From Ethics of Restriction to Ethics of Construction: ELSA Research in Norway. Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies 3(1)
Olesen, V. (2007) Feminist qualitative research and grounded theory: complexities, criticisms, and opportunities. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications Ltd: 417-435
Owen R, Macnaghten P & Stilgoe J (2012) Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society. Science and Public Policy 39(6): 751–760. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs093.
Reichertz, J (2007) Abduction: The Logic of Discovery of Grounded Theory. In Bryant, A and Charmaz, K (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. Los Angeles, CA: Sage: 214-228.
Rip A (2006) Folk Theories of Nanotechnologists. Science as Culture 15(4): 349–365. doi: 10.1080/09505430601022676.
Physiology (2014) A dictionary of Biology, Oxford: Oxford Press
Siune K & Markus E (2009) Challenging Futures of Science in Society. MASIS Expert Group, set up by the European Commision.
Stilgoe J, Owen R & Macnaghten P (2013) Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation. Research Policy 42(9): 1568–1580.
Tutton R (2007) Constructing Participation in Genetic Databases – Citizenship, Governance, and Ambivalence. Science Technology & Human Values 32(2): 172–195.
Van Lente H (2012) Navigating Foresight in a Sea of Expectations: Lessons from the Sociology of Expectations. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24(8): 769–782. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2012.715478.
Von Schomberg R (2011) Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields.
Von Schomberg R (2013) A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation. In: Owen MHR & Bessant J (eds) Responsible Innovation. London: John Wiley.
Walker G, Cass N, Burningham K & Barnett J (2010). Renewable Energy and Sociotechnical Change: Imagined Subjectivities of 'the Public' and their Implications. Environment and Planning A 42(4): 931–947. doi: 10.1068/a41400.
Woolgar S (1990) Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials. The Sociological Review 38(S1): 58–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03349.x.
Wynne B (1992) Misunderstood Misunderstanding: Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science. Public Understanding of Science 3(1).
Wynne B (1995) Public Understanding of Science. In: Jasanoff S, Markle GE, Petersen JC & Pinch T (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
This Science & Technology Studies website ("Site") is owned and operated by The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies (“Society”), PO Box 117, c/o Otto Auranen, Sepänkatu 4-8 A 16, 33230 Tampere,Finland. The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies and its publication Science & Technology Studies are non-profit organizations.
The Society reserves the right to change, modify, add or remove portions of these Terms and Conditions at its discretion at any time and without prior notice. Please check this page periodically for any modifications. Your continued use of this Site following the posting of any changes will mean that you have accepted the changes.Copyrights and Limitations on Use
All content in this Site, including site layout, design, images, text and other information (collectively, the "Content") is the property of The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies/Science & Technology Studies and is protected by copyright and other intellectual property laws, unless otherwise noted.
You may not copy, display, distribute, modify, publish, reproduce, store, transmit, create derivative works from, or sell or license all or any part of the Content, products or services obtained from this Site in any medium to anyone, except as otherwise expressly permitted under applicable law or as described in these Terms and Conditions or relevant license or subscriber agreement.
You may print or download Content from the Site for academic, your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices. You may not engage in systematic retrieval of Content from the Site to create or compile, directly or indirectly, a collection, compilation, database or directory without prior written permission from Science & Technology Studies.
The Site may contain robot exclusion headers, and by using the Site you agree that you will not use any robots, spiders, crawlers or other automated downloading programs or devices to access, search, index, monitor or copy any Content. The harvesting of postal or email addresses from the Site for purposes of sending unsolicited or unauthorized commercial material, is prohibited. Any questions about whether a particular use is authorized and any requests for permission to publish, reproduce, distribute, display or make derivative works from any Content should be directed to the Science & Technology Studies Assistant Editor.
You may not use the services on the Site to publish or distribute any information (including software or other content) that is illegal; violates or infringes upon the rights of any other person; is abusive, hateful, profane, pornographic, threatening or vulgar; contains errors, viruses or other harmful components; or is otherwise actionable by law. Science & Technology Studies may at any time exercise editorial control over the content of any information or material that is submitted or distributed through its facilities and/or services.
You may not, without the approval of Science & Technology Studies, use the Site to publish or distribute any advertising, promotional material, or solicitation to other users of the Site to use any goods or services. For example (but without limitation), you may not use the Site to conduct any business, to solicit the performance of any activity that is prohibited by law, or to solicit other users to become subscribers of other information services. Similarly, you may not use the Site to download and redistribute public information or shareware for personal gain or use the facilities and/or services to distribute multiple copies of public domain information or shareware.Trademarks
All trademarks appearing on this Site are the property of their respective owners.Links to Other Sites
The Site may contain hyperlinks to other sites or resources that are provided solely for your convenience. Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability of external sites or resources linked to the Site, and does not endorse and is not responsible or liable for any content, advertising, products or other materials on or available from such sites or resources. Transactions that occur between you and any third party are strictly between you and the third party and are not the responsibility of Science & Technology Studies. Due to the fact that Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability or accuracy of these outside resources or their contents, you should review the terms and conditions and privacy policies of these linked sites, as their policies may differ from ours.
Last revised: 10 October 2012