Realizing the Basic Income
Competing Claims to Expertise in Transformative Social Innovation
Current social innovation initiatives towards societal transformations bring forward new ways of doing and organizing, but new ways of knowing as well. Their efforts towards realizing those are important sites for the investigation of contemporary tensions of expertise. The promotion of new, transformative ways of knowing typically involves a large bandwidth of claims to expertise. The attendant contestation is unfolded through the exemplar case of the Basic Income, in which the historically evolved forms of academic political advocacy are increasingly accompanied by a new wave of activism. Crowd-funding initiatives, internet activists, citizen labs, petitions and referenda seek to realize the BI through different claims to expertise than previous attempts. Observing both the tensions between diverse claims to expertise and the overall co-production process through which the Basic Income is realized, this contribution concludes with reflections on the politics of expertise involved in transformative social innovation.
Avelino F, Wittmayer J, Pel B et al. (2017) Transformative Social Innovation and (Dis)Empowerment: Towards a Heuristic. Technological Forecasting and Social Change Epub ahead of print 7 June 2017 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.002
Backhaus J and Pel B (2017). BIEN and the Basic Income. TRANSIT WP4 case study report. TRANSIT:EU.
BIEN (2017) A short history of BIEN. Available at: http://www.basicincome.org/about-bien/#history (accessed 20.02.2017).
Blaschke R (2012) From the Idea of a basic income to the political movement in Europe. Available at: http://www.rosalux.de/fileadmin/rls_uploads/pdfs/rls_papers/Papers_Basic-Income_Blaschke-2012pdf.pdf (accessed 20.02.2017).
Branscomb A (1994) Who Owns Information? New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.
Bregman R (2014) Gratis geld voor iedereen. De Correspondent
Callon M (2009) Elaborating the notion of performativity. Le libellio d'AEGIS 5(1): 18-29
Cairney P (2016) The Politics of Evidence-based Policy Making. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Crossley N (1999) Working utopias and social movements: An investigation using case study materials from radical mental health movements in Britain. Sociology 33(4): 809-830.
Dagiral E and Peerbaye A (2016) Making Knowledge in Boundary Infrastructures: Inside and Beyond a Database for Rare Diseases. Science & Technology Studies 29(2): 44-61.
De Wispelaere J and Stirton L (2004) The many faces of universal basic income. The Political Quarterly 75(3): 266-274.
De Wispelaere J and Stirton L (2016) When Basic Income Meets Professor Pangloss: Ignoring Public Administration and Its Perils. The Political Quarterly 88(2):298-305.
Elster J (1986) Comment on Van der Veen and Van Parijs. Theory and Society 15(5): 709-721.
Epstein S (1995) The construction of lay expertise: AIDS activism and the forging of credibility in the reform of clinical trials. Science, Technology & Human Values 20(4): 408-437.
Evans R and Collins H (2008) Expertise: From Attribute to Attribution and Back Again? In Hackett E et al. (2008) The handbook of science and technology studies. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, pp. 609-630.
Ezrahi Y (2004) Science and the political imagination in contemporary democracies, In: Jasanoff S (ed) (2004) States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order. New York: Routledge, pp. 254-273.
Flyvbjerg B (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative inquiry. 12(2): 219-245.
Forget EL (2011) The town with no poverty: the health effects of a Canadian guaranteed annual income field experiment. Canadian Public Policy. 37(3): 283-305.
Gläser J (2003) What Internet Use Does and Does Not Change in Scientific Communities. Science & Technology Studies 16(1): 38-51.
Groot L (2006) Reasons for launching a Basic Income Experiment. Basic Income Studies 1(2): 1-7.
Groot L and Van der Veen RJ (eds.) (2001) Basic Income on the Agenda: Policy Objectives and Political Chances. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Häni D and Kovce P (2015). Was fehlt, wenn alles da ist? Warum das bedingungslose Grundeinkommen die richtigen Fragen stellt. Orell Füssli Verlage.
Haxeltine A, Pel B, Dumitru A et al. (2017), Consolidated version of TSI theory. TRANSIT deliverable D3.4, TRANSIT:EU.
Jalbert K (2016) Building Knowledge Infrastructures for Empowerment: A Study of Grassroots Water Monitoring Networks in the Marcellus Shale. Science & Technology Studies 29(2): 26-43.
Jasanoff S (2003) Breaking the waves in science studies: Comment on HM Collins and Robert Evans, 'The third wave of science studies'. Social studies of science 33(3): 389-400.
Jasanoff S (2004) States of knowledge: the co-production of science and the social order. New York: Routledge.
Klein JL, Camus A, Jetté C et al. (2016) La transformation sociale par l'innovation sociale, Montreal: Presses de l'Université de Québec.
Latour B (2005) Reassembling the social-an introduction to actor-network-theory. Reassembling the Social-An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moulaert F, McCallum D, Mehmood A and Hamdouch A (2013) The international handbook on social innovation: collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Michael M (2016) Actor- network Theory; Trials, Trails and Translations. London: Sage.
Pel B (2016) Interactive Metal Fatigue; A Conceptual Contribution to Social Critique in Mobilities Research. Mobilities 11(5), 662-680.
Pel B, Bauler T, Avelino F et al. (2017a) The Critical Turning Points database; concept, methodology and dataset of an international Transformative Social Innovation comparison TRANSIT Working Paper # 10, TRANSIT: EU.
Pel B, Dorland J, Wittmayer J and Jørgensen MS (2017b) Detecting Social Innovation agency; Methodological reflections on units of analysis in dispersed transformation processes. European Public and Social Innovation Review 2(1): 110-126.
Pettigrew AM (1997) What is a processual analysis?.Scandinavian journal of management 13(4): 337-348.
Prince R (2010). Fleshing out expertise: The making of creative industries experts in the United Kingdom. Geoforum 41(6), 875-884.
Rabeharisoa V, Moreira T and Akrich M (2014) Evidence-based activism: Patients' organisations, users' and activist's groups in knowledge society. BioSocieties 9(2): 111-128.
Ragin CC and Becker HS (1992) What is a case?: exploring the foundations of social inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
Riddell D and Moore ML (2015) Scaling Out, Scaling Up, Scaling Deep: Advancing Systemic Social Innovation and the Learning Processes to Support it. Report for the J.W. McConnell Family Foundation.
Rose N, O'Malley P and Valverde M (2006) Governmentality. Annual review of law and social science 2: 83-104.
Schneider F, Kallis G and Martinez-Alier J (2010) Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecologic sustainability. Introduction to this special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production 18(6): 511-518.
Scott JC (1998) Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
Smith AG (2017) Social Innovation, Democracy and Makerspaces. Working paper #10: SPRU.
Scott-Cato M and Hillier J (2010) How could we study climate-related social innovation? Applying Deleuzean philosophy to Transition Towns. Environmental Politics 19(6): 869-887.
Standing G (2012) Basic income pilot schemes: Seventeen design and evaluation imperatives. Available at: http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/15646/1/Basic%20Income%20Pilot%20Schemes.pdf (accessed 20.02.2017).
Star SL and Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social studies of science 19(3): 387-420.
Stirling A (2016) Knowing Doing Governing: Realizing Heterodyne Democracies. In: Voß JP and Freeman R (eds) (2016) Knowing Governance: The Epistemic Construction of Political Order. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 259-286.
Terwitte J (2009) Should proponents of basic income advocate basic income social experiments in Germany? Hertie school of Governance working papers nr. 46.
TRANSIT (2017) http://www.transitsocialinnovation.eu/ (accessed 29.8.2018).
Van Draanen J (2017) An Analysis of Current Social Media Activity about Basic Income. 17th BIEN congress, 25-27 September 2017, Lisbon, Portugal.
Van Parijs P (1997) Real freedom for all: What (if anything) can justify capitalism? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Parijs P (2013) The Universal Basic Income Why Utopian Thinking Matters and How Sociologists Can Contribute to It. Politics & Society 41(2): 171-182.
Voß J-P (2014) Performative policy studies: realizing "transition management". Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 27 (4): 317-343.
Voß J-P and Freeman R (2016) Introduction: Knowing Governance, In: Voß JP and Freeman R (eds) (2016) Knowing Governance: The Epistemic Construction of Political Order. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1-34.
Westley F, McGowan K and Tjörnbo O (2017) The Evolution of Social Innovation: Building Resilience Through Transitions. Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar.
Widerquist K (2006) The bottom line in a basic income experiment. Basic Income Studies 1(2): 1-5.
Widerquist K and Haagh L (2016) Our Vision for BIEN 2016. Available at: http://basicincome.org/news/2016/06/our-vision-for-bien-2016/ (accessed 20.02.2017).
Wildavsky A (1979) The art and craft of policy analysis: Speaking truth to power. Boston: Little, Brown.
Wittmayer JM, Backhaus J, Avelino F et al. (2015) Narratives of change: how social innovation initiatives engage with their transformative ambitions. TRANSIT working paper #4. TRANSIT:EU.
Wittmayer JM, Avelino F, Dorland J et al. (2015) Methodological guidelines Batch 2. TRANSIT Deliverable 4.3. TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant agreement no: 613169.
Wright EO (2013) Transforming capitalism through real utopias. American Sociological Review 78: 1-25.
Wyatt S, Harris A and Kelly SE (2016) Controversy goes online: Schizophrenia genetics on Wikipedia. Science & Technology Studies 19(1): 13-29.
Wynne B (1996) A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In: Lash S, Szerszynski B and Wynne B (eds) Risk, environment and modernity: towards a new ecology. Sage: London, pp. 44-83.
Yin RK (2003) Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Terms & Conditions
This Science & Technology Studies website ("Site") is owned and operated by The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies (“Society”). The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies and its publication Science & Technology Studies are non-profit organizations.
The Society reserves the right to change, modify, add or remove portions of these Terms and Conditions at its discretion at any time and without prior notice. Please check this page periodically for any modifications. Your continued use of this Site following the posting of any changes will mean that you have accepted the changes.
Copyrights and Limitations on Use
Content in this Site, including site layout, design, images, text and other information (collectively, the "Content") is the property of The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies/Science & Technology Studies and is protected by copyright and other intellectual property laws, unless otherwise noted. This does not include the articles that remain the copyright of the authors.
Content on this website is protected by Creative Commons license CC BY 4.0. This permits users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the published articles. Using and sharing the content is permitted as long as original materials are appropriately credited.
The Site may contain robot exclusion headers, and by using the Site you agree that you will not use any robots, spiders, crawlers or other automated downloading programs or devices to access, search, index, monitor or copy any Content. The harvesting of postal or email addresses from the Site for purposes of sending unsolicited or unauthorized commercial material, is prohibited. Any questions about whether a particular use is authorized and any requests for permission to publish, reproduce, distribute, display or make derivative works from any Content should be directed to the Science & Technology Studies Assistant Editor.
You may not use the services on the Site to publish or distribute any information (including software or other content) that is illegal; violates or infringes upon the rights of any other person; is abusive, hateful, profane, pornographic, threatening or vulgar; contains errors, viruses or other harmful components; or is otherwise actionable by law. Science & Technology Studies may at any time exercise editorial control over the content of any information or material that is submitted or distributed through its facilities and/or services.
You may not, without the approval of Science & Technology Studies, use the Site to publish or distribute any advertising, promotional material, or solicitation to other users of the Site to use any goods or services. For example (but without limitation), you may not use the Site to conduct any business, to solicit the performance of any activity that is prohibited by law, or to solicit other users to become subscribers of other information services. Similarly, you may not use the Site to download and redistribute public information or shareware for personal gain or use the facilities and/or services to distribute multiple copies of public domain information or shareware.
All trademarks appearing on this Site are the property of their respective owners.
Links to Other Sites
The Site may contain hyperlinks to other sites or resources that are provided solely for your convenience. Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability of external sites or resources linked to the Site, and does not endorse and is not responsible or liable for any content, advertising, products or other materials on or available from such sites or resources. Transactions that occur between you and any third party are strictly between you and the third party and are not the responsibility of Science & Technology Studies. Due to the fact that Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability or accuracy of these outside resources or their contents, you should review the terms and conditions and privacy policies of these linked sites, as their policies may differ from ours.
Last revised: 3 Aug 2020