Profiles of Malaria Research in Portugal
Organizing, Doing and Thinking in Science Under Capitalism
Synergies between globalization and knowledge economy were suggested to direct biomedical research towards economically-interested activities. In this context, research in malaria, a disease endemic to poverty, may be at a paradoxical stance. This study addresses this issue assessing whether malaria research is driven by the accumulation of economic and/or other forms of capital. Drawing upon academic and epistemic capitalism, malaria research is characterized through the analysis of all Web of science-indexed publications involving Portuguese organizations (1900-2014; n=467). First, data was systematized by content and bibliometric analyses. Subsequently, multiple correspondence analysis revealed a bi-dimensional landscape (who’s publishing; what’s published) and cluster analysis identified three profiles (beginners; local appropriations; global science). This study reveals the construction of Portugal’s scientific system and unveils the assimilation of dominant modes of organizing, doing and thinking despite malaria’s research low profit potential. Extending this approach to other biomedical fields can unravel the dimensions underlying science’s (re)construction.
Adam D. (2002) Citation analysis: The counting house. Nature 415: 726-729.
Alonso PL, Brown G, Arevalo-Herrera M, et al. (2011) A Research Agenda to Underpin Malaria Eradication. PLOS Medicine 8: e1000406.
Belter CW (2015) Bibliometric indicators: opportunities and limits. Journal of the Medical Library Association 103: 219-221.
Benzécri J-P (1992) Correspondence Analysis Handbook, city: Taylor & Francis.
Blumenthal D, Epstein S and Maxwell J (1986) Commercializing University Research. New England Journal of Medicine 314: 1621-1626.
Bourdieu P (1979) La distinction: critique sociale du jugement, Paris: Editions de Minuit.
Bourdieu P (1984) Homo Academicus, Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
Bourdieu P (1989) La noblesse d'état: grands corps et esprit de corps, Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
Bourdieu P (1999) Une révolution conservatrice dans l'édition. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 126-127.
Brown P, McCormick S, Mayer B, et al. (2006) "A Lab of Our Own". Environmental Causation of Breast Cancer and Challenges to the Dominant Epidemiological Paradigm. Science, Technology, & Human Values 31: 499-536.
Bruce-Chwatt LJ and Zulueta Jd (1977) Malaria eradication in Portugal. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 71: 232-240.
Caminade C, Kovats S, Rocklov J, et al. (2014) Impact of climate change on global malaria distribution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111: 3286-3291.
Coccia M and Wang L (2016) Evolution and convergence of the patterns of international scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113: 2057-2061.
Cullen KA, Mace KE and Arguin PM (2016) Malaria Surveillance — United States, 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ 65: 1-22.
Daems R, Maes E, Mehra M, et al. (2014) Pharmaceutical Portfolio Management: Global Disease Burden and Corporate Performance Metrics. Value in Health 17: 732-738.
Dance A (2012) Who's on first? Nature 489: 591-592.
Epstein S (1996) Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. City: University of California Press.
Etzkowitz H (1983) Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science. Minerva 21: 198-233.
Fochler M (2016) Variants of Epistemic Capitalism: Knowledge Production and the Accumulation of Worth in Commercial Biotechnology and the Academic Life Sciences. Science, Technology & Human Values 41: 922-948.
Frame JD and Carpenter MP (1979) International Research Collaboration. Social Studies of Science 9: 481-497.
Fu H, Hu T, Wang J, et al. (2015) A bibliometric analysis of malaria research in China during 2004–2014. Malaria Journal 14: 195.
Garg KC, Dutt B and Kumar S (2006) A preliminary scientometric investigation of malaria research. Annals of Library and Information Studies 53: 43-53.
Garg KC, Kumar S, Madhavi Y, et al. (2009) Bibliometrics of global malaria vaccine research. Health Information & Libraries Journal 26: 22-31.
Glänzel W (2001) National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics 51: 69-115.
GläSer J and Laudel G (2007) The Social Construction Of Bibliometric Evaluations. In: Whitley R and Gläser J (eds) The Changing Governance of the Sciences: The Advent of Research Evaluation Systems. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 101-123.
Godin B and Gingras Y (2000) The place of universities in the system of knowledge production. Research Policy 29: 273-278.
Greenacre M and Blasius J (2006) Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods in Practice. In: Greenacre M and Blasius J (eds) Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC, pp. 3-40.
Gupta BM and Balaji A (2011) A bibliometric analysis of malaria research in india during 1998–2009. Jounal of Vector Borne Disease 48: 163-170.
Hackett EJ (1990) Science as a Vocation in the 1990s: The Changing Organizational Culture of Academic Science. The Journal of Higher Education 61: 241-279.
Hackett EJ (2001) Organizational Perspectives on University-Industry Research Relations. In: Croissant J and Restivo S (eds) Degrees of Compromise. Industrial Interests and cademic Values. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1-22.
Hackett EJ (2005) Essential Tensions: Identity, Control, and Risk in Research. Social Studies of Science 35: 787-826.
Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, et al. (2013) Multivariate Data Analysis, Exex: Pearson.
Hess DJ (2016) Undone Science: Social Movements, Mobilized Publics, and Industrial Transitions CITY? MIT Press.
Hessels LK and van Lente H (2008) Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy 37: 740-760.
Hicks DM and Katz JS (1996) Where Is Science Going? Science, Technology & Human Values 21: 379-406.
Kleinman DL (2010) The Commercialization of Academic Culture and the Future of the University. In: Radder H (ed) The Commodification of Academic Research. Science and the Modern University. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 24-43.
Kleinman DL and Vallas SP (2001) Science, Capitalism, and the Rise of the "Knowledge Worker": The Changing Structure of Knowledge Production in the United States. Theory and Society 30: 451-492.
Krimsky S, Ennis JG and Weissman R (1991) Academic-Corporate Ties in Biotechnology: A Quantitative Study. Science, Technology & Human Values 16: 275-287.
Krimsky S and Nader R (2004) Science in the Private Interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research? Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Larivière V, Desrochers N, Macaluso B, et al. (2016) Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science 46: 417-435.
Lewison G, Lipworth S and de Francisco A (2002) Input indicators from output measures: a bibliometric approach to the estimation of malaria research funding. Research Evaluation 11: 155-163.
Lewison G and Srivastava D (2008) Malaria research, 1980–2004, and the burden of disease. Acta Tropica 106: 96-103.
Lezaun J and Montgomery CM (2015) The Pharmaceutical Commons: Sharing and Exclusion in Global Health Drug Development. Science, Technology & Human Values 40: 3-29.
Luukkonen T, Persson O and Sivertsen G (1992) Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration. Science, Technology & Human Values 17: 101-126.
Marôco J (2014) Análise Estatística com o SPSS Statistics, Pero Pinheiro: ReportNumber.
Martin BR (2011) What can bibliometrics tell us about changes in the mode of knowledge production? Prometheus 29: 455-479.
Meena M and Nagarajan M (2013) Indian Research Output on Malaria: A Bibliometric Study using Scopus Data Base. Journal of Advances in Library and Information Science 4: 192-196.
Moore K, Kleinman DL, Hess D, et al. (2011) Science and neoliberal globalization: a political sociological approach. Theory and Society 40: 505-532.
Muller R. (2012) Collaborating in Life Science Research Groups: The Question of Authorship. High Educ Policy 25: 289-311. (HIGH EDUC POLICY IS THE CORRECT NAME?)
Patrício MT (2011) Science Policy and the Internationalisation of Research in Portugal Journal of Studies in International Education 14: 161-182.
Patrício MT and Santos Pereira T (2015) A política científica europeia e a internacionalização da ciência. In: Rodrigues MdL and Heitor M (eds) 40 Anos de Políticas de Ciência e de Ensino Superior. Coimbra: Edições Almedina, pp. 221-243.
Pollock A (2014) Places of pharmaceutical knowledge-making: Global health, postcolonial science, and hope in South African drug discovery. Social Studies of Science 44: 848-873.
Rafols I, Hopkins MM, Hoekman J, et al. (2014) Big Pharma, little science? Technological Forecasting and Social Change 81: 22-38.
Rodrigues MdL (2015) Análise cronológica das políticas públicas: ruturas e continuidades. In: Rodrigues MdL and Heitor M (eds) 40 Anos de Políticas de Ciência e de Ensino Superior. Lisboa: Almedina, pp. 25-50.
Rodrigues PS, Fonseca L and Chaimovich H (2000) Mapping cancer, cardiovascular and malaria research in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 33: 853-867.
Roux BL and Rouanet H (2004) Geometric Data Analysis: From Correspondence Analysis to Structured Data Analysis: Springer Netherlands.
Roux BL and Rouanet H (2010) Multiple Correspondence Analysis: SAGE Publications.
Rushforth A and de Rijcke S (2015) Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands. Minerva 53: 117-139.
Saha S, Saint S and Christakis DA (2003) Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? Journal of the Medical Library Association 91: 42-46.
Santos Pereira T (1996) Uma análise do impacto das políticas europeias na colaboração internacional em investigação científica em Portugal e no Reino Unido. Análise Social XXXI (1.º): 229-265.
Santos Pereira T (2002) International Dimension of Research in Portugal: Implications for coordination and collaboration in European research. Science and Public Policy 29: 451-461.
Sigl L (2015) On the Tacit Governance of Research by Uncertainty: How Early Stage Researchers Contribute to the Governance of Life Science Research. Science, Technology & Human Values ISSUE + PAGES LACKING.
Slaughter S and Leslie LL (1999) Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Slaughter S and Rhoades G (2004) Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State, and Higher Education: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Slegen PO (1997) Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal 314: 498–502.
Stokes DE (2011) Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation, Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
Trouiller P, Olliaro P, Torreele E, et al. (2002) Drug development for neglected diseases: a deficient market and a public-health policy failure. The Lancet 359: 2188-2194.
Weber RP (1990) Basic Content Analysis, Newbury Park: Sage.
Weiner C (1987) Patenting and Academic Research: Historical Case Studies. Science, Technology, & Human Values 12: 50-62.
Weingart P (2010) The Unintended Consequences of Quantitative Measures in the Management of Science. In: Joas H, Wittrock B and Klein B (eds) The Benefit of Broad Horizons: Intellectual and Institutional Preconditions for a Global Social Science. Brill, pp. 370-386.
World Health Organization (2016) World Malaria Report 2016. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Ylijoki O-H (2003) Entangled in Academic Capitalism? A Case-Study on Changing Ideals and Practices of University Research. Higher Education 45: 307-335.
This Science & Technology Studies website ("Site") is owned and operated by The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies (“Society”), PO Box 117, c/o Otto Auranen, Sepänkatu 4-8 A 16, 33230 Tampere,Finland. The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies and its publication Science & Technology Studies are non-profit organizations.
The Society reserves the right to change, modify, add or remove portions of these Terms and Conditions at its discretion at any time and without prior notice. Please check this page periodically for any modifications. Your continued use of this Site following the posting of any changes will mean that you have accepted the changes.Copyrights and Limitations on Use
All content in this Site, including site layout, design, images, text and other information (collectively, the "Content") is the property of The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies/Science & Technology Studies and is protected by copyright and other intellectual property laws, unless otherwise noted.
You may not copy, display, distribute, modify, publish, reproduce, store, transmit, create derivative works from, or sell or license all or any part of the Content, products or services obtained from this Site in any medium to anyone, except as otherwise expressly permitted under applicable law or as described in these Terms and Conditions or relevant license or subscriber agreement.
You may print or download Content from the Site for academic, your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices. You may not engage in systematic retrieval of Content from the Site to create or compile, directly or indirectly, a collection, compilation, database or directory without prior written permission from Science & Technology Studies.
The Site may contain robot exclusion headers, and by using the Site you agree that you will not use any robots, spiders, crawlers or other automated downloading programs or devices to access, search, index, monitor or copy any Content. The harvesting of postal or email addresses from the Site for purposes of sending unsolicited or unauthorized commercial material, is prohibited. Any questions about whether a particular use is authorized and any requests for permission to publish, reproduce, distribute, display or make derivative works from any Content should be directed to the Science & Technology Studies Assistant Editor.
You may not use the services on the Site to publish or distribute any information (including software or other content) that is illegal; violates or infringes upon the rights of any other person; is abusive, hateful, profane, pornographic, threatening or vulgar; contains errors, viruses or other harmful components; or is otherwise actionable by law. Science & Technology Studies may at any time exercise editorial control over the content of any information or material that is submitted or distributed through its facilities and/or services.
You may not, without the approval of Science & Technology Studies, use the Site to publish or distribute any advertising, promotional material, or solicitation to other users of the Site to use any goods or services. For example (but without limitation), you may not use the Site to conduct any business, to solicit the performance of any activity that is prohibited by law, or to solicit other users to become subscribers of other information services. Similarly, you may not use the Site to download and redistribute public information or shareware for personal gain or use the facilities and/or services to distribute multiple copies of public domain information or shareware.Trademarks
All trademarks appearing on this Site are the property of their respective owners.Links to Other Sites
The Site may contain hyperlinks to other sites or resources that are provided solely for your convenience. Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability of external sites or resources linked to the Site, and does not endorse and is not responsible or liable for any content, advertising, products or other materials on or available from such sites or resources. Transactions that occur between you and any third party are strictly between you and the third party and are not the responsibility of Science & Technology Studies. Due to the fact that Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability or accuracy of these outside resources or their contents, you should review the terms and conditions and privacy policies of these linked sites, as their policies may differ from ours.
Last revised: 10 October 2012