Profiles of Malaria Research in Portugal

Organizing, Doing and Thinking in Science Under Capitalism

  • Ana Ferreira Centro Interdisciplinar de Ciências Sociais (CICS.NOVA), Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas da Universidade NOVA de Lisboa (NOVA FCSH)
  • Ana Lúcia Teixeira Centro Interdisciplinar de Ciências Sociais (CICS.NOVA), Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas da Universidade NOVA de Lisboa (NOVA FCSH)

Abstract

Synergies between globalization and knowledge economy were suggested to direct biomedical research towards economically-interested activities. In this context, research in malaria, a disease endemic to poverty, may be at a paradoxical stance. This study addresses this issue assessing whether malaria research is driven by the accumulation of economic and/or other forms of capital. Drawing upon academic and epistemic capitalism, malaria research is characterized through the analysis of all Web of science-indexed publications involving Portuguese organizations (1900-2014; n=467). First, data was systematized by content and bibliometric analyses. Subsequently, multiple correspondence analysis revealed a bi-dimensional landscape (who’s publishing; what’s published) and cluster analysis identified three profiles (beginners; local appropriations; global science). This study reveals the construction of Portugal’s scientific system and unveils the assimilation of dominant modes of organizing, doing and thinking despite malaria’s research low profit potential. Extending this approach to other biomedical fields can unravel the dimensions underlying science’s (re)construction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Author (2011)

Author (2016)

Adam D. (2002) Citation analysis: The counting house. Nature 415: 726-729.
https://doi.org/10.1038/415726a

Alonso PL, Brown G, Arevalo-Herrera M, et al. (2011) A Research Agenda to Underpin Malaria Eradication. PLOS Medicine 8: e1000406.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000406

Belter CW (2015) Bibliometric indicators: opportunities and limits. Journal of the Medical Library Association 103: 219-221.
https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.4.014

Benzécri J-P (1992) Correspondence Analysis Handbook, city: Taylor & Francis.

Blumenthal D, Epstein S and Maxwell J (1986) Commercializing University Research. New England Journal of Medicine 314: 1621-1626.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198606193142506

Bourdieu P (1979) La distinction: critique sociale du jugement, Paris: Editions de Minuit.

Bourdieu P (1984) Homo Academicus, Paris: Éditions de Minuit.

Bourdieu P (1989) La noblesse d'état: grands corps et esprit de corps, Paris: Éditions de Minuit.

Bourdieu P (1999) Une révolution conservatrice dans l'édition. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 126-127.
https://doi.org/10.3406/arss.1999.3278

Brown P, McCormick S, Mayer B, et al. (2006) "A Lab of Our Own". Environmental Causation of Breast Cancer and Challenges to the Dominant Epidemiological Paradigm. Science, Technology, & Human Values 31: 499-536.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243906289610

Bruce-Chwatt LJ and Zulueta Jd (1977) Malaria eradication in Portugal. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 71: 232-240.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0035-9203(77)90014-1

Caminade C, Kovats S, Rocklov J, et al. (2014) Impact of climate change on global malaria distribution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111: 3286-3291.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302089111

Coccia M and Wang L (2016) Evolution and convergence of the patterns of international scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113: 2057-2061.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510820113

Cullen KA, Mace KE and Arguin PM (2016) Malaria Surveillance — United States, 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ 65: 1-22.
https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6502a1

Daems R, Maes E, Mehra M, et al. (2014) Pharmaceutical Portfolio Management: Global Disease Burden and Corporate Performance Metrics. Value in Health 17: 732-738.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2014.07.005

Dance A (2012) Who's on first? Nature 489: 591-592.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7417-591a

Epstein S (1996) Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. City: University of California Press.

Etzkowitz H (1983) Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science. Minerva 21: 198-233.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01097964

Fochler M (2016) Variants of Epistemic Capitalism: Knowledge Production and the Accumulation of Worth in Commercial Biotechnology and the Academic Life Sciences. Science, Technology & Human Values 41: 922-948.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916652224

Frame JD and Carpenter MP (1979) International Research Collaboration. Social Studies of Science 9: 481-497.
https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277900900405

Fu H, Hu T, Wang J, et al. (2015) A bibliometric analysis of malaria research in China during 2004–2014. Malaria Journal 14: 195.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0715-2

Garg KC, Dutt B and Kumar S (2006) A preliminary scientometric investigation of malaria research. Annals of Library and Information Studies 53: 43-53.

Garg KC, Kumar S, Madhavi Y, et al. (2009) Bibliometrics of global malaria vaccine research. Health Information & Libraries Journal 26: 22-31.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2008.00779.x

Glänzel W (2001) National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics 51: 69-115.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010512628145

GläSer J and Laudel G (2007) The Social Construction Of Bibliometric Evaluations. In: Whitley R and Gläser J (eds) The Changing Governance of the Sciences: The Advent of Research Evaluation Systems. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 101-123.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6746-4_5

Godin B and Gingras Y (2000) The place of universities in the system of knowledge production. Research Policy 29: 273-278.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00065-7

Greenacre M and Blasius J (2006) Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods in Practice. In: Greenacre M and Blasius J (eds) Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC, pp. 3-40.
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420011319

Gupta BM and Balaji A (2011) A bibliometric analysis of malaria research in india during 1998–2009. Jounal of Vector Borne Disease 48: 163-170.

Hackett EJ (1990) Science as a Vocation in the 1990s: The Changing Organizational Culture of Academic Science. The Journal of Higher Education 61: 241-279.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1990.11780710

Hackett EJ (2001) Organizational Perspectives on University-Industry Research Relations. In: Croissant J and Restivo S (eds) Degrees of Compromise. Industrial Interests and cademic Values. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1-22.

Hackett EJ (2005) Essential Tensions: Identity, Control, and Risk in Research. Social Studies of Science 35: 787-826.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705056045

Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, et al. (2013) Multivariate Data Analysis, Exex: Pearson.

Hess DJ (2016) Undone Science: Social Movements, Mobilized Publics, and Industrial Transitions CITY? MIT Press.

Hessels LK and van Lente H (2008) Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy 37: 740-760.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.008

Hicks DM and Katz JS (1996) Where Is Science Going? Science, Technology & Human Values 21: 379-406.
https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399602100401

Kleinman DL (2010) The Commercialization of Academic Culture and the Future of the University. In: Radder H (ed) The Commodification of Academic Research. Science and the Modern University. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 24-43.
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7zw87p.5

Kleinman DL and Vallas SP (2001) Science, Capitalism, and the Rise of the "Knowledge Worker": The Changing Structure of Knowledge Production in the United States. Theory and Society 30: 451-492.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011815518959

Krimsky S, Ennis JG and Weissman R (1991) Academic-Corporate Ties in Biotechnology: A Quantitative Study. Science, Technology & Human Values 16: 275-287.
https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399101600301

Krimsky S and Nader R (2004) Science in the Private Interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research? Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Larivière V, Desrochers N, Macaluso B, et al. (2016) Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science 46: 417-435.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046

Lewison G, Lipworth S and de Francisco A (2002) Input indicators from output measures: a bibliometric approach to the estimation of malaria research funding. Research Evaluation 11: 155-163.
https://doi.org/10.3152/147154402781776826

Lewison G and Srivastava D (2008) Malaria research, 1980–2004, and the burden of disease. Acta Tropica 106: 96-103.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2008.01.009

Lezaun J and Montgomery CM (2015) The Pharmaceutical Commons: Sharing and Exclusion in Global Health Drug Development. Science, Technology & Human Values 40: 3-29.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243914542349

Luukkonen T, Persson O and Sivertsen G (1992) Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration. Science, Technology & Human Values 17: 101-126.
https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399201700106

Marôco J (2014) Análise Estatística com o SPSS Statistics, Pero Pinheiro: ReportNumber.

Martin BR (2011) What can bibliometrics tell us about changes in the mode of knowledge production? Prometheus 29: 455-479.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08109028.2011.643540

Meena M and Nagarajan M (2013) Indian Research Output on Malaria: A Bibliometric Study using Scopus Data Base. Journal of Advances in Library and Information Science 4: 192-196.

Moore K, Kleinman DL, Hess D, et al. (2011) Science and neoliberal globalization: a political sociological approach. Theory and Society 40: 505-532.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-011-9147-3

Muller R. (2012) Collaborating in Life Science Research Groups: The Question of Authorship. High Educ Policy 25: 289-311. (HIGH EDUC POLICY IS THE CORRECT NAME?)
https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2012.11

Patrício MT (2011) Science Policy and the Internationalisation of Research in Portugal Journal of Studies in International Education 14: 161-182.

Patrício MT and Santos Pereira T (2015) A política científica europeia e a internacionalização da ciência. In: Rodrigues MdL and Heitor M (eds) 40 Anos de Políticas de Ciência e de Ensino Superior. Coimbra: Edições Almedina, pp. 221-243.

Pollock A (2014) Places of pharmaceutical knowledge-making: Global health, postcolonial science, and hope in South African drug discovery. Social Studies of Science 44: 848-873.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312714543285

Rafols I, Hopkins MM, Hoekman J, et al. (2014) Big Pharma, little science? Technological Forecasting and Social Change 81: 22-38.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.06.007

Rodrigues MdL (2015) Análise cronológica das políticas públicas: ruturas e continuidades. In: Rodrigues MdL and Heitor M (eds) 40 Anos de Políticas de Ciência e de Ensino Superior. Lisboa: Almedina, pp. 25-50.

Rodrigues PS, Fonseca L and Chaimovich H (2000) Mapping cancer, cardiovascular and malaria research in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 33: 853-867.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2000000800001

Roux BL and Rouanet H (2004) Geometric Data Analysis: From Correspondence Analysis to Structured Data Analysis: Springer Netherlands.

Roux BL and Rouanet H (2010) Multiple Correspondence Analysis: SAGE Publications.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412993906

Rushforth A and de Rijcke S (2015) Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands. Minerva 53: 117-139.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-015-9274-5

Saha S, Saint S and Christakis DA (2003) Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? Journal of the Medical Library Association 91: 42-46.

Santos Pereira T (1996) Uma análise do impacto das políticas europeias na colaboração internacional em investigação científica em Portugal e no Reino Unido. Análise Social XXXI (1.º): 229-265.

Santos Pereira T (2002) International Dimension of Research in Portugal: Implications for coordination and collaboration in European research. Science and Public Policy 29: 451-461.
https://doi.org/10.3152/147154302781780778

Sigl L (2015) On the Tacit Governance of Research by Uncertainty: How Early Stage Researchers Contribute to the Governance of Life Science Research. Science, Technology & Human Values ISSUE + PAGES LACKING.

Slaughter S and Leslie LL (1999) Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Slaughter S and Rhoades G (2004) Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State, and Higher Education: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Slegen PO (1997) Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal 314: 498–502.

Stokes DE (2011) Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation, Washington: Brookings Institution Press.

Trouiller P, Olliaro P, Torreele E, et al. (2002) Drug development for neglected diseases: a deficient market and a public-health policy failure. The Lancet 359: 2188-2194.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09096-7

Weber RP (1990) Basic Content Analysis, Newbury Park: Sage.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983488

Weiner C (1987) Patenting and Academic Research: Historical Case Studies. Science, Technology, & Human Values 12: 50-62.
https://doi.org/10.1177/016224398701200105

Weingart P (2010) The Unintended Consequences of Quantitative Measures in the Management of Science. In: Joas H, Wittrock B and Klein B (eds) The Benefit of Broad Horizons: Intellectual and Institutional Preconditions for a Global Social Science. Brill, pp. 370-386.
https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004192843.i-436.117

World Health Organization (2016) World Malaria Report 2016. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Ylijoki O-H (2003) Entangled in Academic Capitalism? A Case-Study on Changing Ideals and Practices of University Research. Higher Education 45: 307-335.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022667923715
Published
2019-09-16