Sensory Science in Tension
How Environmental Odour Sensing Involves Skills, Affects and Ethics
For the last 15 years, sensory science has frequently been recommended to industrial actors to monitor odours, assess the quality of the environment and improve their factories’ functioning. Resident “sniffing teams” have been put in place in different contexts to assess odorous pollution. These teams are groups of local residents living in the neighbourhoods of industrial facilities, who have been trained to report pollution emissions. This article describes these teams as sensory devices and argues that their functioning relies on the consent of the residents to allow themselves to “be affected differently” by smells – from annoyance to interest and curiosity about odour recognition and reporting activity. This consent, which is based on an ‘ethic’ of sensing, centered on the sniffers’ own feelings, is delicate, tense and reversible, given the emotionally-loaded contexts of odorous pollution.
Barbier R (2005) Quand le public prend ses distances avec la participation. Natures Sciences Sociétés 13(3): 258-265.
Bessy C and Chateauraynaud F (1995) Experts et faussaires. Pour une sociologie de la perception. Paris: Paris Métailié.
Blondiaux L and Sintomer Y (2002) L'impératif délibératif. Politix 15(57): 17-35.
Bonnaud L and Martinais E (2005) Des usines à la campagne aux villes industrielles. La cohabitation ville/industrie saisie à travers l'histoire du droit des établissements classés. Développement durable et territoires(Dossier 4). doi: 10.4000/developpementdurable.749
Bonneuil C and Fressoz J-B (2016) The shock of the Anthropocene: The earth, history and us. CITY: Verso Books.
Callon M (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In: Law J (ed), Power, Action and Befief: A New Sociology of Knowledge. Londres, Boston and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 196-233.
Callon M (2009) Acting in an uncertain world. CITY: MIT press.
Candau J (2000) Mémoire et expériences olfactives. Anthropologie d'un savoir-faire essentiel. City: Presses Universitaires de France.
Candau J (2004) The Olfactory Experience: constants and cultural variables. Water science and technology 49(9): 11-17.
Candau J and Jeanjean A (2006) Des odeurs à ne pas regarder…. Terrain. Revue d'ethnologie de l'Europe(47): 51-68.
Capel C (2009) Qui sont les observateurs bénévoles de Météo France? Ethnologie française 39(4): 631-637.
Charvolin F, Frioux S, Kamoun L, et al. (2015) Un air familier? Sociohistoire des pollutions atmosphériques. City: Presses des MINES.
Charvolin F, Micoud A and Nyhart LK (2007) Des sciences citoyennes?: la question de l'amateur dans les sciences naturalistes. City: Éditions de l'aube.
Chateauraynaud F (1997) Vigilance et transformation. Présence corporelle et responsabilité dans la conduite des dispositifs techniques. Réseaux 85(septembre-octobre) : 101-127.
Chateauraynaud F and Debaz J (2013) De la métrologie en démocratie. La nouvelle vague des capteurs citoyens. hypotheses.org. Available at: http://socioargu.hypotheses.org/4505 (accessed 30 August 2018).
Classen C, Howes D and Synnott A (1994) Aroma: The cultural history of smell. City: Taylor & Francis.
Collins HM and Evans R (2002) The third wave of science studies studies of expertise and experience. Social studies of science 32(2): 235-296.
Colon P-L (2012) Écouter le bruit, faire entendre la gêne. Communications(1): 95-107.
Corbin A (1986) The foul and the fragrant: odor and the French social imagination. City: Harvard University Press.
de la Bellacasa MP (2011) Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science 41(1): 85-106.
Deleuze G (1990) The Logic of Sense. New York: Columbia University Press.
Deleuze G and Guattari F (1987) Capitalism and schizophrenia: A thousand plateaus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Despret V (2004) The body we care for: Figures of anthropo-zoo-genesis. Body & Society 10(2-3): 111-134.
Ellis R and Waterton C (2004) Environmental citizenship in the making: the participation of volunteer naturalists in UK biological recording and biodiversity policy. Science and public policy 31(2): 95-105.
Hochschild AR (1979) Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American journal of sociology 85(3): 551-575.
Howes D (2015) The science of sensory evaluation: An ethnographic critique. In: Drazin A and Küchler S (eds) The Social Life of Materials: Studies in Materials and Society. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, pp. 81-97.
Ingold T (2000) The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. City: Psychology Press.
Irwin A (1995) Citizen science: A study of people, expertise and sustainable development. City: Psychology Press.
Jasanoff S (2003) Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 41(3): 223-244.
Jaubert J-N, Tapiero C and Dore J-C (1995) The field of odors: toward a universal language for odor relationships. Perfumer & flavorist 20(3): 1-16.
Jeanjean A (1999) Les égouts de Montpellier: mots crus et mots propres. Ethnologie française: 607-615.
Kerr A and Garforth L (2016) Affective practices, care and bioscience: a study of two laboratories. The Sociological Review 64(1): 3-20.
Köster E, Punter P, Maiwald K, et al. (1985) Direct scaling of odour annoyance by population panels. VDI-Berichte 561, 299-311.
Lahne J (2016) Sensory science, the food industry, and the objectification of taste. Anthropology of food (10).
Latour B (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour B (2004a) How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body & society 10(2-3): 205-229.
Latour B (2004b) Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Law J and Lynch M (1988) Lists, field guides, and the descriptive organization of seeing: Birdwatching as an exemplary observational activity. Human Studies 11(2-3): 271-303.
Lawrence A (2006) 'No personal motive?'Volunteers, biodiversity, and the false dichotomies of participation. Ethics Place and Environment 9(3): 279-298.
Lawrence A (2009) The first cuckoo in winter: phenology, recording, credibility and meaning in Britain. Global Environmental Change 19(2): 173-179.
Lawrence A (2010) Taking stock of nature: Participatory biodiversity assessment for policy, planning and practice. City: Cambridge University Press.
Lawrence A and Turnhout E (2010) Personal meaning in the public sphere: The standardisation and rationalisation of biodiversity data in the UK and the Netherlands. Journal of Rural Studies 26(4): 353-360.
Lengwiler M (2008) Participatory approaches in science and technology historical origins and current practices in critical perspective. Science, Technology & Human Values 33(2): 186-200.
Lorimer J (2008) Counting corncrakes: the affective science of the UK corncrake census. Social studies of science 38(3): 377-405.
Massard-Guilbaud G (1999) La régulation des nuisances industrielles urbaines (1800-1940). Vingtieme siecle. Revue d'histoire 64(1): 53-65.
Muniesa F and Trébuchet-Breitwiller A-S (2010) Becoming a measuring instrument: an ethnography of perfume consumer testing. Journal of Cultural Economy 3(3): 321-337.
Myers N (2008) Molecular embodiments and the body-work of modeling in protein crystallography. Social studies of science 38(2): 163-199.
Phillips CJ (2016) The taste machine: Sense, subjectivity, and statistics in the California wine world. Social Studies of Science 46(3): 461-481.
Rémy E and Estades J (2007) Nez à nez avec des nuisances odorantes. L'apprentissage de la cohabitation spatiale. Sociologie du Travail 49(2): 237-252.
Rosenwein BH (2006) Emotional communities in the early middle ages. City: Cornell University Press.
Roussel I and Schmitt G (2004) Les odeurs, une préoccupation de santé publique urbaine, la réponse d'un dispositif "citoyen". Pollution atmosphérique 181(janvier-mars): 7-14.
Shapin S (2012) The sciences of subjectivity. Social Studies of Science 42(2): 170-184.
Shapin S (2016) A taste of science: Making the subjective objective in the California wine world. Social Studies of Science 46(3): 436-460.
Suffet I and Rosenfeld P (2007) The anatomy of odour wheels for odours of drinking water, wastewater, compost and the urban environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5): 335-344.
Teil G (1998) Devenir expert aromaticien: Y a-t-il une place pour le goût dans les goûts alimentaires? Sociologie du travail 98(4): 503-522.
Teil G and Hennion A (2004) Discovering quality or performing taste? A sociology of the amateur. Qualities of food 19.
Thrift N (2000) Afterwords. Environment and planning D: Society and Space 18(2): 213-255.
Thrift N (2008) Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. City: Routledge.
Wetherell M (2012) Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. London: Sage Publications.
Yearley S (2006) Bridging the science–policy divide in urban air-quality management: evaluating ways to make models more robust through public engagement. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 24(5): 701-714.
Terms & Conditions
This Science & Technology Studies website ("Site") is owned and operated by The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies (“Society”). The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies and its publication Science & Technology Studies are non-profit organizations.
The Society reserves the right to change, modify, add or remove portions of these Terms and Conditions at its discretion at any time and without prior notice. Please check this page periodically for any modifications. Your continued use of this Site following the posting of any changes will mean that you have accepted the changes.
Copyrights and Limitations on Use
Content in this Site, including site layout, design, images, text and other information (collectively, the "Content") is the property of The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies/Science & Technology Studies and is protected by copyright and other intellectual property laws, unless otherwise noted. This does not include the articles that remain the copyright of the authors.
Content on this website is protected by Creative Commons license CC BY 4.0. This permits users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the published articles. Using and sharing the content is permitted as long as original materials are appropriately credited.
The Site may contain robot exclusion headers, and by using the Site you agree that you will not use any robots, spiders, crawlers or other automated downloading programs or devices to access, search, index, monitor or copy any Content. The harvesting of postal or email addresses from the Site for purposes of sending unsolicited or unauthorized commercial material, is prohibited. Any questions about whether a particular use is authorized and any requests for permission to publish, reproduce, distribute, display or make derivative works from any Content should be directed to the Science & Technology Studies Assistant Editor.
You may not use the services on the Site to publish or distribute any information (including software or other content) that is illegal; violates or infringes upon the rights of any other person; is abusive, hateful, profane, pornographic, threatening or vulgar; contains errors, viruses or other harmful components; or is otherwise actionable by law. Science & Technology Studies may at any time exercise editorial control over the content of any information or material that is submitted or distributed through its facilities and/or services.
You may not, without the approval of Science & Technology Studies, use the Site to publish or distribute any advertising, promotional material, or solicitation to other users of the Site to use any goods or services. For example (but without limitation), you may not use the Site to conduct any business, to solicit the performance of any activity that is prohibited by law, or to solicit other users to become subscribers of other information services. Similarly, you may not use the Site to download and redistribute public information or shareware for personal gain or use the facilities and/or services to distribute multiple copies of public domain information or shareware.
All trademarks appearing on this Site are the property of their respective owners.
Links to Other Sites
The Site may contain hyperlinks to other sites or resources that are provided solely for your convenience. Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability of external sites or resources linked to the Site, and does not endorse and is not responsible or liable for any content, advertising, products or other materials on or available from such sites or resources. Transactions that occur between you and any third party are strictly between you and the third party and are not the responsibility of Science & Technology Studies. Due to the fact that Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability or accuracy of these outside resources or their contents, you should review the terms and conditions and privacy policies of these linked sites, as their policies may differ from ours.
Last revised: 3 Aug 2020