Online Expert Mediators
The Rise of a New ‘Bipolar’ Stakeholder or Going Beyond Interactional Expertise in the Blogosphere
Using Collins and Evans’ concept of interactional expertise, this article examines the online activities of three bloggers diagnosed with bipolar disorder. It argues that by combining medical knowledge with their situated experiences, and by utilizing the affordances of blogs, these bloggers have become a new type of stakeholder, the online expert mediator. Collins and Evans’ concept is extended by taking into consideration the role of the medium through which interactional expertise is displayed and by showing that its bi-directional character is more substantial than they had envisaged. The rise of this new stakeholder category denotes a possible turn from community activism to exceptional entrepreneurial selves. Despite views that the internet would have broad democratizing effects, the findings show that the high standing of online expert mediators is not the result of a subversive use of this medium, but of a dynamic alliance with ‘traditional’ experts and of a strong media presence.
Adams S (2013) Maintaining the Collision of Accounts: Crowdsourcing Sites in Health Care As Brokers in the Co-Production of Pharmaceutical Knowledge. Information, Communication & Society 17(6): 657-669.
Arksey H (1994) Expert and Lay Participation in the Construction of Medical Knowledge. Sociology of Health & Illness 16(4): 448-468.
Armstrong D (1995) The Rise of Surveillance Medicine. Sociology of Health & Illness, 17 (3): 393-404.
Barbot J & Dodier N (2002) Multiplicity in Scientific Medicine: The Experience of HIV-positive Patients. Science, Technology & Human Values 27: 404-440.
Barbot J (2006) How To Build An "Active" Patient? The Work of AIDS Associations in France. Social Science & Medicine 62: 538-551.
Barak A (1999) Psychological Applications on the Internet: A Discipline on the Threshold of a New Millennium. Applied & Preventive Psychology 8: 231-246.
Barak A, Hen L, Boniel-Nissim M, Shapira N (2008) A Comprehensive Review and a Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Internet-Based Psychotherapeutic Interventions. Journal of Technology in Human Services 26(2/4): 109-160.
Barak A & Grohol J (2011) Current and Future Trends in Internet-Supported Mental Health Interventions. Journal of Technology in Human Services 29(3): 155-196
Barello S, Graffigna G, Vegni E, Bosio A (2014) The Challenges of Conceptualizing Patient Engagement in Health Care: A Lexicographic Literature Review. Journal of Participatory Medicine 6(11): 1-15.
Barnes M & Shardlow P (1997) From Passive Recipient to Active Citizen: Participation in Mental Health User Groups. Journal of Mental Health 6(3): 289-300.
Borkman T (1976) Experiential Knowledge: A New Concept for the Analysis of Self-Help Groups. Social Service Review 50(3): 445-456.
Bottles K (2013) Health Hackers and Citizen Scientists Shake Up Medical Research. Physician Executive Journal: 88-90.
Brodwin P & Velpry L (2014) The Practice of Constraint in Psychiatry: Emergent Forms of Care and Control. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 38(4): 524-526.
Brown P (1988) The Transfer of Care: Psychiatric Deinstitutionalization and Its Aftermath. London: Routledge Kegan & Paul.
Carlbring P & Andersson G (2006) Internet and Psychological Treatment. How Well Can They Be Combined? Computers in Human Behavior 22: 545-553.
Collins H & Evans R (2002) The Third Wave of Science Studies. Studies of Expertise and Experience. Social Studies of Science 32(2): 235-296.
Collins H, Evans R, Ribeiro R, Hall M (2006) Experiments with Interactional Expertise. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37: 656-674.
Collins H & Evans R (2007) Re-thinking Expertise. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Collins H & Evans R (2015) Expertise Revisited, Part I -Interactional Expertise. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 54: 113-123.
Collins H, Evans R, Weinel M (2017) Interactional Expertise. In Felt U, Fouché R, Miller C, Smith-Doerr L (eds.) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (4th ed.), Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press: 765-792.
Crossley M & Crossley N (2001) 'Patient' Voices, Social Movements and the Habitus: How Psychiatric Survivors 'Speak Out'. Social Science & Medicine 52:1477-1489.
Crossley N (2006) The Field of Psychiatric Contention in the UK, 1960-2000. Social Science & Medicine 62: 552-563.
Davidson L (2005) Recovery, Self Management and the Expert Patient- Changing the Culture of Mental Health from a UK Perspective. Journal of Mental Health 14(1): 25-35.
De Boer M & Slatman J (2014) Blogging and Breast Cancer: Narrating One's Life, Body and Self on the Internet. Women's Studies International Forum 44(1): 17-25.
Dickel S & Franzen M (2016) The "Problem of Extension" Revisited: New Modes of Digital Participation in Science. Journal of Science Communication 15(1): 1-15.
Director D (2005) Using an Action Research Approach to Involving Service Users in the Assessment of Professional Competence. European Journal of Social Work 8(2): 165-179.
Epstein S (1995) The Construction of Lay Expertise: AIDS Activism and the Forging of Credibility in the Reform of Clinical Trials. Science, Technology & Human Values 20(4): 408-437.
Epstein S (1996) Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Eysenbach G, Powell J, Englesakis M, Rizo C, Stern A (2004) Health Related Virtual Communities and Electronic Support Groups: Systematic Review of The Effects of Online Peer To Peer Interactions. British Medical Journal 328(7449): 1166-1170.
Fox N, Ward K, O'Rourke A (2005) The 'Expert Patient': Empowerment or Medical Dominance? The Case of Weight Loss, Pharmaceutical Drugs and the Internet. Social Science & Medicine 69: 1299-1309.
Gillard S, Simons L, Turner K, Lucock M, Edwards C (2012) Patient and Public Involvement in the Coprodution of Knowledge: Reflection on the Analysis of Qualitative Data in a Mental Health Study. Qualitative Health Research 22(8): 1126-1137.
Goddiksen M (2014) Clarifying Interactional and Contributory Expertise. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 47: 111-117.
Gowen K, Deschaine M, Gruttadara D, Markey D (2012) Young Adults with Mental Health Conditions and Social Networking Websites: Seeking Tools To Build Community. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 35(3): 245-250.
Godfrey M, Callaghan G, Johnson L, Waddington E (2003) Supporting People: A Guide to User Involvement for Organizations Providing Housing Related Support Services. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
Grob G (2005) The Transformation of Mental Health Policy in Twentieth-Century America. In Gijswijt-Hofstra M, Oosterhuis H, Vijselaar J, Freeman H (eds.), Psychiatry and Mental Health Care in the Twentieth-Century: Comparisons and Approaches. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press: 141-161.
Hardey M (1999) Doctor in the House: The Internet as A Source of Lay Health Knowledge and the Challenge to Expertise. Sociology of Healthy & Illness 21: 820-835.
Haker H, Lauber C, Rössler W (2005) Internet Forums: A Self-Help Approach for Individuals with Schizophrenia? Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 112: 474-477.
Harris A, Wyatt S, Kelly S (2011) Conceptualizing Trust in Digital Environments. Health-e skepticism: Trust in the Age of the Internet. In: A Decade in Internet Time: Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society (OII-ICS Symposium), Oxford, UK, 21-24 September 2011, 1-11.
Heilferty C (2009) Toward A Theory of Online Communication in Illness: Concept Analysis of Illness Blogs. Journal of Advanced Nursing 65(7): 1539-1547.
Hewlett S, Wit M, Richards P, Quest E, Hughes R, Heiberg T, Kirwan J (2006) Patients and Professionals as Research Partners: Challenges, Practicalities, and Benefits. Arthritis Care & Research, 55(4): 676-680.
Hickey G & Kipping C (1998) Exploring the Concept of User Involvement in Mental Health Through a Participation Continuum. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 7: 83-88.
Hogg C (2009) Citizens, Consumers and the NHS: Capturing Voices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Horwitz A &Wakefield J (2007) The Loss of Sadness. How Psychiatry Transformed Normal Sorrow into Depressive Disorder. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Huovila J & Saikkonen S (2016) Establishing Credibility, Constructing Understanding: The Epistemic Struggle over Healthy Eating in the Finnish Dietetic Blogosphere. Health 20(4): 383-400.
Iversen P (2007) Strange Son: Two Mothers, Two Sons, and the Quest to Unlock the Hidden World of Autism. New York: Riverhead Books.
Kallinikos J & Tempini N (2014) Patient Data as Medical Facts: Social Media Practices as a Foundation for Medical Knowledge Creation. Information Systems Research 25(4): 817-833.
Kemp P (2010) The Creative Involvement of Service Users in the Classroom. In Weinstein J, (ed.) Mental Health, Service User Involvement and Recovery. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, pp. 15-29.
Kirsch I (2010) The Emperor's New Drugs: Exploding the Antidepressant Myth. New York: Basic Books.
Kivits J (2009) Everyday Health and the Internet: A Mediated Health Perspective on Health Information Seeking. Sociology of Health and Illness 31(5): 673-687.
Kivits J (2013) E-Health and Renewed Sociological Approaches to Health and Illness. In: Orton-Johnson & Prior N (eds.) Digital Sociology. Critical Perspectives. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 213-226.
Klawiter M (1999) Racing for the Cure, Walking Women, and Toxic Touring: Mapping Cultures of Action within the Bay Area Terrain of Breast Cancer. Social Problems 46(1): 104-126.
Kopelson K (2009) Writing Patients' Wrongs: The Rhetoric and Reality of Information Age Medicine. Journal of Advanced Composition 29: 353-404.
Kraus R, Stricker G, Speyer C (eds.) (2010). Online Counseling: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
Kushner H (2004) Competing Medical Cultures, Patient Support Groups, and the Construction of Tourette's Syndrome. In: Packard R, Brown P, Berkelman R, Frumkin H (eds.) Emerging Illnesses and Society: Negotiating the Public Health. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 71-101.
Lamberg L (2003) Online Empathy for Mood Disorder. Patients Turn to Internet Support Groups. Medical News & Perspectives 289(23): 3073-3077.
Landzelius K (2006) Introduction: Patient Organization Movements and New Metamorphoses in Patienthood. Social Science & Medicine 62(3): 529- 537.
Latour B (2005) Re-assembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lemire M, Sicotte C, Paré G (2008) Internet Use and The Logics of Personal Empowerment in Health. Health Policy 88: 130-140.
Lerner B (2001) No Shrinking Violet: Rose Kushner and the Rise of American Breast Cancer Activism. Western Journal of Medicine 174(5): 362.
Lucivero F & Prainsack B (2015) The Lifestylization of Healthcare? Consumer Genomics' and Mobile Health as Technologies for Healthy Lifestyle. Applied & Translational Genomics 4: 44-49.
Lupton D (1995) The Imperative of Health: Public Health and the Regulated Body. London: Sage Publications.
Lupton D (1997) Foucault and The Medicalisation Critique. In: Petersen A & Bunton R (eds.) Foucault, Health and Medicine. London: Routledge, 94-112.
Lupton D (2014) The Commodification of Patient Opinion: The Digital Patient Experience Economy in the Age of Big Data. Sociology of Health & Illness 36(6): 856-869.
Marks I & Cavanagh K (2009) Computer-aided Psychological Treatments: Evolving Issues. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 5: 121-141.
Mazanderani F, Locock L, Powell J (2012) Being Differently The Same: The Mediation of Identity Tensions in the Sharing of Illness Experiences. Social Science & Medicine 74(4): 546-553.
McLean A (2000) From Ex-Patient Alternatives to Consumer Options: Consequences of Consumerism for Psychiatric Consumers and the Ex-Patient Movement. International Journal of Health Services 30(4): 821-847.
McPherson S & Armstrong D (2006) Social Determinants of Diagnostic Labels in Depression. Social Science & Medicine 62(11): 50-58.
Mulveen R & Hepworth J (2006) An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Participation in a Pro-Anorexia Internet Site and Its Relationship with Disordered Eating. Journal of Health Psychology 11(2): 283: 296.
Naslund J, Aschbrenner K, Marsch L, McHugo, G, Barteks S. (2015) Crowdsourcing for conducting randomized trials of internet delivered interventions in people with serious mental illness: A systematic review. Contemporary Clinical Trials 44: 77-88.
Nicholas J, Larsen M, Proudfoot J, Christensen H (2015) Mobile Apps for BP: A Systematic Review of Features and Content Quality. Journal of Medical Internet Research 17(8): e198.
Nettleton S (2004) "The Emergence of E-scaped Medicine?". Sociology 38(4): 661-679.
Novas C (2006) The Political Economy of Hope: Patients' Organizations, Science and Biovalue. BioSocieties 1: 289-305.
Park D (2009) Blogging with Authority: Strategic Positioning in Political Blogs. International Journal of Communication 3: 250-273.
Pickersgill M (2012) What is Psychiatry? Co-Producing Complexity in Mental Health. Social Theory & Health, 10: 328-347.
Plaisance K & Kennedy E (2014) A Pluralistic Approach to Interactional Expertise. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 47: 60-68.
Pols J (2014) Knowing Patients: Turning Patient Knowledge into Science. Science, Technology & Human Values 39(1): 73-97.
Prior L (2003) Belief, Knowledge and Expertise: The Emergence of the Lay Expert in Medical Sociology. Sociology of Health & Illness 25: 41-57.
Proudfoot J (2004) Computer-Based Treatment for Anxiety and Depression: Is It Feasible? Is It Effective? Neuroscience and Behavioral Reviews 28: 353-363.
Oravec J (2000) Online Counselling and the Internet: Perspectives for Mental Health Care Supervision and Education. Journal of Mental Health 9(2): 121-135.
Orsini M & Smith M (2010) Social Movements, Knowledge and Public Policy: The Case of Autism Activism in Canada and the US. Critical Policy Studies 4(1): 38-57.
Rabeharisoa V, Moreira T, Akrich M (2013) Evidence-based Activism: Patients' Organizations, Users' and Activist's Groups in Knowledge Society". CSI Working Papers Series 033: 1-27.
Radin P (2006) "To Me, It's My Life": Medical Communication, Trust, and Activism in Cyberspace. Social Science & Medicine 62: 591-601.
Reich Z (2012) Journalism as Bipolar Interactional Expertise. Communication Theory 22: 339-358.
Ringer A & Holen M (2016) "Hell, no, they'll think you're mad as a hatter": Illness Discourses and their Implications for Patients in Mental Health Practice. Health 20 (2): 161-175.
Rowland P, McMillan S, McGillicuddy P, Richards J (2017) What Is "The Patient Perspective" in Patient Engagement Programs? Implicit Logics and Parallels to Feminist Theories. Health 21(1): 76-92.
Shanahan M (2010) Changing the Meaning of Peer-To-Peer? Exploring Online Comment Spaces as Sites of Negotiated Expertise. Journal of Science Communication 9(1): 1-13.
Sharon T (2017) Self-tracking for Health and the Quantified Self: Re-articulating Autonomy, Solidarity and Authenticity in An Age of Personalized Healthcare. Philosophy & Technology, 30(1): 93-121.
Smith DJ, Griffiths E, Poole R, di Fiorio A, Barnes E, Kelly MJ, Craddock N, Hood K, Simpson S (2011) Beating Bipolar: Exploratory Trial of a Novel Internet-Based Psychoeducational Treatment for BP. Bipolar Disorders, 13: 571-577.
Scott S (2006) The Medicalisation of Shyness: From Social Misfits to Social Fitness. Sociology of Health & Illness 28(2): 133-153.
Speed E (2006) Patients, Consumers, and Survivors: A Case Study of Mental Health Service User Discourses. Social Science & Medicine 62: 28-38.
Taussig K-S, Rapp R, Heath D (2003) Flexible Eugenics: Technologies of the Self in the Age of Genetics. In: Goodman A et al (eds.) Genetic Nature/Culture: Anthropology and Science Beyond the Two-Culture Divide. Berkeley: University of California Press, 58-76.
Terry S & Boyd C (2001) Researching the Biology of PXE: Partnering in the Process. American Journal of Medical Genetics 106: 177-184.
Tremayne M (2007) Blogging, Citizenship and the Future of Media. London: Routledge.
Turner B (1995) Medical Power and Social Knowledge (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Tutton R & Prainsack B (2011) Enterprising or Altruistic Selves? Making Up Research Subjects in Genetics Research. Sociology of Health & Illness 33(7): 1081-1095.
Wathen N, Wyatt S, Harris R (eds.) (2008) Mediating Health Information: The Go-Betweens in a Changing Socio-Technical Landscape. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Whitaker R (2010) Anatomy of An Epidemic: Magic Bullets, Psychiatric Drugs, and the Astonishing Rise of Mental Illness. New York: Crown Publishing Group.
Whitley R (2012) The Antipsychiatry Movement: Dead, Diminishing, or Developing? Psychiatric Services 63(10): 1039-1041.
Wright R & Cummings A (2005) Destructive Trends in Mental Health. The Well-Intentioned Path to Harm. London: Routledge
Wyatt S, Harris A, Adams S (2013) Illness Online: Self-Reported Data and Questions of Trust in Medical and Social Research. Theory, Culture & Society 30(4): 131-150.
Ybarra M & Eaton W (2005) Internet-Based Mental Health Interventions. Mental Health Services Research 7(2): 75-87.
Terms & Conditions
This Science & Technology Studies website ("Site") is owned and operated by The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies (“Society”). The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies and its publication Science & Technology Studies are non-profit organizations.
The Society reserves the right to change, modify, add or remove portions of these Terms and Conditions at its discretion at any time and without prior notice. Please check this page periodically for any modifications. Your continued use of this Site following the posting of any changes will mean that you have accepted the changes.
Copyrights and Limitations on Use
Content in this Site, including site layout, design, images, text and other information (collectively, the "Content") is the property of The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies/Science & Technology Studies and is protected by copyright and other intellectual property laws, unless otherwise noted. This does not include the articles that remain the copyright of the authors.
Content on this website is protected by Creative Commons license CC BY 4.0. This permits users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the published articles. Using and sharing the content is permitted as long as original materials are appropriately credited.
The Site may contain robot exclusion headers, and by using the Site you agree that you will not use any robots, spiders, crawlers or other automated downloading programs or devices to access, search, index, monitor or copy any Content. The harvesting of postal or email addresses from the Site for purposes of sending unsolicited or unauthorized commercial material, is prohibited. Any questions about whether a particular use is authorized and any requests for permission to publish, reproduce, distribute, display or make derivative works from any Content should be directed to the Science & Technology Studies Assistant Editor.
You may not use the services on the Site to publish or distribute any information (including software or other content) that is illegal; violates or infringes upon the rights of any other person; is abusive, hateful, profane, pornographic, threatening or vulgar; contains errors, viruses or other harmful components; or is otherwise actionable by law. Science & Technology Studies may at any time exercise editorial control over the content of any information or material that is submitted or distributed through its facilities and/or services.
You may not, without the approval of Science & Technology Studies, use the Site to publish or distribute any advertising, promotional material, or solicitation to other users of the Site to use any goods or services. For example (but without limitation), you may not use the Site to conduct any business, to solicit the performance of any activity that is prohibited by law, or to solicit other users to become subscribers of other information services. Similarly, you may not use the Site to download and redistribute public information or shareware for personal gain or use the facilities and/or services to distribute multiple copies of public domain information or shareware.
All trademarks appearing on this Site are the property of their respective owners.
Links to Other Sites
The Site may contain hyperlinks to other sites or resources that are provided solely for your convenience. Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability of external sites or resources linked to the Site, and does not endorse and is not responsible or liable for any content, advertising, products or other materials on or available from such sites or resources. Transactions that occur between you and any third party are strictly between you and the third party and are not the responsibility of Science & Technology Studies. Due to the fact that Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability or accuracy of these outside resources or their contents, you should review the terms and conditions and privacy policies of these linked sites, as their policies may differ from ours.
Last revised: 3 Aug 2020