Learning to Become an FSC Auditor

Objectivity, Interpretation, and Mastery

  • William Clark Cook Forest and Nature Conservation Policy Group, Wageningen University
  • Esther Turnhout Forest and Nature Conservation Policy Group, Wageningen University
  • Severine van Bommel

Abstract

This paper aims to open up the black box of auditing for the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) forest management standard. Specifically, we delve into the early steps of becoming an FSC auditor by examining two auditor training sessions in northern Europe. Using a mix of participant observation and unstructured interviews, the paper subjects the trainings to analysis focusing on the ways in which trainees are taught to become FSC experts. Alongside being an exploratory piece on the nature of FSC auditor training, we show how auditing expertise is a matter of performing objectivity and how interpretation is a key aspect of these performances. Learning how to do interpretation, and what values should guide this interpretation, is part of the training but also poses a challenge to the teachers because these aspects cannot be seen to impinge on the objectivity of auditing. We suggest that the mitigation of these tensions during the performance of objectivity is the hallmark of auditing expertise. We conclude our analysis by discussing expertise as a matter of reflecting on and aligning objectivity, values, and interpretation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arts B and Buizer M (2009) Forests, discourses, institutions: A discursive-institutional analysis of global forests. Forest and Policy Economics 11(5-6): 340-347.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2008.10.004

Accreditation Services International (2017). Accreditation Services International. Available at: http://www.accreditation-services.com/archives/standards/fsc (accessed 01 September 2017)

Auld G and Bull G (2003) The institutional design of forest certification standards initiatives and its influence on the role of science: The case of forest genetic resources. Journal of Environmental Management 69(1): 47-62.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4797(03)00118-X

Auld G, Gulbrandsen L, and McDermott C (2008) Certification Schemes and the Impacts on Forests and Forestry. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 33: 187-211.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.33.013007.103754

Bal R, Bijker W and Hendriks R (2002) Paradox van wetenschappelijk gezag. Over de maatschappelijke invloed van adviezen van de Gezondheidsraad.

Collins H and Evans R (2007) Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Domingues P, Sampaio P and Arezes P (2011) Beyond "audit" definition : a framework proposal for integrated management systems. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Industrial Engineering Research Conference (eds Doolen T and Van Aken E), Reno, NV, USA.

Douglas H (2004) The Irreducible Complexity of Objectivity. Synthese 138(3): 453-473.
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000016451.18182.91

Douglas H (2009) Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press.

Dreyfus H and Dreyfus S (2005) Peripheral Vision: Expertise in Real World Contexts. Organization Studies 26(5): 779-792.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605053102

Ebeling J and Yasué M (2009) The effectiveness of market-based conservation in the tropics: Forest certification in Ecuador and Bolivia. Journal of Environmental Management 90(2): 1145-1153.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.05.003

Eden S (2008) Being fieldworthy: environmental knowledge practices and the space of the field in forest certification. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26(6): 1018-1035.
https://doi.org/10.1068/d3208

Eyal G and Buchholz L (2010) From the Sociology of Intellectuals to the Sociology of Interventions. Annual Review of Sociology 36: 117-137.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102625

Forest Stewardship Council (2016) FSC Procedures. Available at: https://ic.fsc.org/preview.fsc-pro-20-004-v1-2-en-general-requirements-for-an-fsc-training-programme.a-5679.pdf (accessed 14 September 2016)

Forest Stewardship Council (2017) FSC IC. Available at: https://ic.fsc.org/en/facts-and-figures (accessed on 01 September 2017)

Gilbert N and Mulkay M (1984) Opening Pandora's Box: A sociological analysis of scientists' discourse. Cambridge University Press.

Goffman E (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.

Gupta A and Mason M (2014) A Transparency Turn in Global Environmental Governance. In: Gupta A, and Mason M (eds) Transparency in Global Environmental Governance. The MIT Press, pp. 240-287.

Hilgartner S (2000) Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama. Stanford, California: Standford University Press.

Konefal J and Hatanaka M (2011) Enacting third-party certification: A case study of science and politics. Journal of Rural Studies 27(2): 125-133.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.12.001

Kotzee B (2014) Expertise, fluency and social realism about professional knowledge. Journal of Education and Work 27(2): 161-178
https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2012.738291

Law J (2009) Collateral Realities. In: Heterogeneities.net, John Law's STS Web Page. Available at: http://heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2009CollateralRealities.pdf (accessed 05.12.2013)

Maletz O and Tysiachniouk M (2009) The effect of expertise on the quality of forest standards implementation: The case of FSC forest certification in Russia. Forest Policy and Economics 11(5-6): 422-428.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2009.03.002

McDermott C (2012) Trust, Legitimacy and Power in Forest Certification: A case study of the FSC in British Columbia. Geoforum 43(3): 634-644.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.11.002

Mol A (2008) Environmental Reform in the Information Age: The contours of informational governance. Cambridge University Press.

Moore SE, Cubbage F and Eicheldinger C (2012) Impacts of Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and Sustainable Forest Initiative (SFI) Forest Certification in North America. Journal of Forestry 110(2): 79-88.

Pentland B (1993) Getting Comfortable with the numbers : Auditing and the micro-production of macro-order. Accounting Organisations and Society 18(7-8): 605-620.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)90045-8

Porter T (1995) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton University Press.

Power M (1995) Auditing, expertise and the sociology of technique. Critical Prespectives on Auditing 6: 317-339
https://doi.org/10.1006/cpac.1995.1029

Power M (1997) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. New York: Oxford University Press.

Strathern M (2000) The Tyranny of Transparency. British Educational Research Journal 26(3): 309-321.
https://doi.org/10.1080/713651562

Turnhout E, Neves K, and Lijster E (2014). 'Measurementality' in biodiversity governance: Knowledge, transparency, and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Environment and Planning A (46): 581-597.

Turnhout E, Skutsch M, & De Koning J (2016). Carbon Accounting. In K Bäckstrand, & E Lövbrand (Eds.). Research Handbook of Climate Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 273-317

Power M (2000) The Audit Society - Second Thoughts. International Journal of Auditing 4(1): 111-119.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1099-1123.00306

Power M (2003) Auditing and the production of legitimacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28: 379-394.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00047-2

Strathern M (2000) The Tyranny of Transparency. British Educational Research Journal 26(3): 309-321.
https://doi.org/10.1080/713651562

Turner S (2010) Normal Accidents in Expertise. Minerva 48(3): 239–258.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-010-9153-z

Yanow D (2015) After Mastery. In: Garud R, Simpson B, Langley A, and Tsoukas H (eds) The Emergence of Novelty in Organizations. Oxford University Press, pp. 273-317
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198728313.003.0011
Published
2020-05-14