Citizen Science Across a Spectrum: Building Partnerships to Broaden the Impact of Citizen Science

  • Shannon Dosemagen
  • Alison Parker


Environmental protection as a movement is broadening to both invite and require the participation and energy of everyone, including federal agencies, local governments, activists, and enthusiasts. Citizen science and community science, approaches rooted in non-traditional partnerships and diverse participation, are a strong approach to science, and they are especially strong approaches to a wide range of outcomes with direct impacts on the protection of the environment, from civic engagement all the way to enforcement action. There is evidence that institutions and agencies are moving towards more inclusive visions of their missions, and citizen and community scientists are motivated to engage. We propose a spectrum of engagement that defines opportunities for citizen science and community science beyond the participation of volunteers in institution-driven or scientist-driven research; we also provide examples of projects and efforts that have led to outcomes for each of the spectrum categories. We argue that the impact of citizen science and community science can be strengthened through the recognition of a wide range of partnership structures, including long-term community documentation, community pattern identification, community problem source identification, and advocacy to community. Citizen science and community science represent a more inclusive version of science, and provide a model for embracing truly collaborative environmental protection, as well.  


Download data is not yet available.


Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J. and Wilderman, C.C. 2009a. Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. Washington, DC: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE).

Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K.V., Shirk, J. 2009b. Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience 59 (11): 977-984.

Bonney, R., Shirk, J.L., Phillips, T.B., Wiggins, A., Ballard, H.L., Miller-Rushing, A.J., Parrish, J.K. 2014. Next steps for citizen science. Science 343, 1436-1437.

Ceccaroni, L., Bowser, A. and Brenton, P. 2017 (in press). Civic Education and Citizen Science: Definitions, Categories, Knowledge Representation. Eds. Ceccaroni, L. and Piera, J. Analyzing the Role of Citizen Science in Modern Research. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Cooper et al.

Converse R., Shaw, D., Eichhorst K. and Leinhart M. 2016. Bringing citizen monitoring into land management: a case study of the Bosque Ecosystem Monitoring Program. Journal of Science Communication 15 (03), A02: 1-14.

Corburn, J. 2005. Street science: Community knowledge and environmental health justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Danielson, F., Burgess, N.D., Jensen, M., Pirhofer-Walzl, K. 2010. Environmental monitoring: the scale and speed of implementation varies according to the degree of people's involvement. Journal of Applied Ecology 47(6): 1166-1168.

Diesel Health Project. 2015. Accessed March 30, 2018.

Dillon, J., Stevenson, R.B., and Wals, A.E.J. 2016. Moving from Citizen to Civic Science. Conservation Biology 30(3): 450-455.

Dosemagen, S. and Gehrke, G. 2016. Civic Technology and Community Science: A New Model for Public Participation in Environmental Decisions In: Confronting the Challenges of Public Participation: Issues in Environmental, Planning and Health Decision-Making (Proceedings of the Iowa State University Summer Symposia on Science Communication (ed. Goodwin, J.), Ames, IA, 3-4 June 2016.

Ellwood, E.R., Crimmins, T.M., Miller-Rushing, A.J. 2017. Citizen science and conservation: Recommendations for a rapidly moving field. Biological Conservation

Environmental Protection Agency. 2015. Science in Action: Innovative Research for a Sustainable Future. Accessed March 30, 2018:

Environmental Protection Agency. 2016a. Environmental Protection Agency history. Accessed December 15, 2016:

Environmental Protection Agency. 2016b. NACEPT 2016 Report: Environmental Protection Belongs to the Public, A Vision for Citizen Science at EPA. Accessed December 15, 2016:

Fortun and Fortun. 2005. Scientific Imaginaries and Ethical Plateaus in Contemporary U.S. Toxicology. American Anthropologist, Vol. 107(1): 43-54.

Funk, C., Gottfried, J., Mitchell, A. Pew Research Center, September, 2017, "Science News and Information Today"

James-Creedon, J. 'Jackie James-Creedon: The Whole Truth' last modified March 2, 2016.

Haklay, M. 2013. Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information overview and typology of participation. In Sui, D.Z., Elwood, S. and M.F. Goodchild (eds.) Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Springer. Pp 105-122

Holdren, J. 2015. Addressing Societal and Scientific Challenges Through Citizen Science and Crowdsourcing. September 30 memorandum to the heads of executive departments and agencies. Washington D.C.: Office of Science and Technology Policy, Executive Office of the President.

McEflish, J., Pendergrass, J. and Fox, T. 2016. Clearing the Path: Citizen Science and Public Decision Making in the United States. Washington D.C.: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

McKinley, Duncan C., Abe J. Miller-Rushing, Heidi L. Ballard, Rick Bonney, Hutch Brown, Susan C. Cook-Patton, Daniel M. Evans, Rebecca A. French, Julia A. Parrish, Tina B. Phillips, Sean F. Ryan, Lea A. Shanley, Jennifer L. Shirk, Kristine F. Stepenuck, Jake F. Weltzin, Andrea Wiggins, Owen D. Boyle, Russell D. Briggs, Stuart F. Chapin, III, David A. Hewitt, Peter W. Preuss, & Michael A. Soukup, "Investing in Citizen Science Can Improve Natural Resource Management and Environmental Protection." Issues in Ecology 19 (2015).

Newman, G., Chandler, M., Clyde, M., McGreavy, B., Haklay, M., Ballard, H., Gray, S., Scarpino, R., Hauptfeld, R., Mellor, D., and Gallo, J. 2016. Leveraging the Power of Place in Citizen Science for Effective Conservation Decision Making. Biological Conservation in press.

Ottinger, G. 2009. Buckets of Resistance: Standards and the Effectiveness of Citizen Science. Science, Technology and Human Values, Vol. 35(2): 244-270.

Ramirez-Andreotta, M.D. M.L. Brusseau, J.F. Artiola, R.M. Maier, and A.J. Gandolfi. 2014. Building a co-created citizen science program with gardeners neighboring a Superfund site: The Gardenroots case study. In Public Health: Improving Health via Inter-Professional Collaborations, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Eds: Caron RM and Merrick J.

Shellenberger, M. and Nordhaus, T. 2004. The Death of Environmentalism: Global warming politics in a post-environmental world. Accessed December 15, 2016:

Shirk, J.L., Ballard, H.L., Wilderman, C.C., Phillips, T., Wiggins, A., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Minarchek, M., Lewenstein, B.V., Krasny, M.E. and Bonney, R. 2012. Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society 17(2): 29.

Siegal, M. 'Senior volunteers prompted $1-million-plus emergency repair' Philadelphia Corporation for Aging. Accessed March 30, 2018:

SEATOR: Sitka Tribe of Alaska: Southeast Alaska Tribal Toxins Partnership. 2015. Accessed March 30, 2018:

Staudt, K., Dane-El, M., Marquez-Velarde, G. 2015. In the Shadow of a Steel Recycling Plant in These Neoliberal Times: Health Disparities Among Hispanics in a Border Colonia. Local Environment 21(5): 636–652.

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. 2015. Consent Decree: Gulf Restoration Network et al. v. United Bulk Terminals Davant, LLC: Case 14-cv-00608.