Engineering Publics: The Different Modes of Civic Technoscience

  • Sascha Dickel TU Munich
  • Christoph Schneider Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
  • Carolin Thiem TU Munich
  • Klara-Aylin Wenten TU Munich

Abstract

Amongst the many modes of citizen science in the past years TechnoCitizenScience has emerged. In this paper we argue that it is necessary to distinguish between science and technoscience since they are based upon different practices and goals. Whilst 'science' tries to explain the world, 'technoscience' tries to technologically construct worlds. Whereas citizen science involves publics to contribute to data gathering and interpretation, TechnoCitizenScience involves publics in technological world making. The article analyses three different cases of TechnoCitizenScience in a FabLab, a professional Makerspace and a civic hackathon. Whilst particular similarities such as discourses of inclusion and engineering rationalities guide these activities we show that TechnoCitizenScience takes place in diverse settings to fulfill different agendas. By creating prototypes for engineering publics TechnoCitizenScience expands the regime of technoscience into society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AUTHOR 2014

AUTHOR 2016 A

AUTHOR 2016 B

AUTHOR 2017 A

AUTHOR 2017 B

Abbott A (2007) The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Andersen, NA & Knudsen H (2016) Playful hyper-responsibility and the making of a performing audience. Soziale Systeme 19(2): 433-455.

Barben D & Fisher E & Selin C & Guston D (2010) Anticipatory Governance of Nanotechnology: Foresight, Engagement and Integration. In: Hackett EJ; Amsterdamska O; Lynch M; Wajcman J (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edit, Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press, 979-1000.

Bonney R & Cooper CB & Dickinson J & Kelling S & Phillips T & Rosenberg KV & Shirk J (2009) Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy. BioScience 59 (11): 977-984.

Bonney R & Phillips TB & Ballard HD & Enck JW (2016) Can Citizen Science Enhance Public Understanding of Science? Public Understanding of Science 25 (1): 2 16.

Callon M & Rabeharisoa V (2003) Research “in the Wild” and the Shaping of New Social Identities. Technology in Society 25 (2): 193 204.

Castells M (2002) The Internet galaxy: reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chen SL (2010) Wikipedia: A Republic of Science Democratized. Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology 20 (2): 247 325.

Collins H & Evans R (2002) The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience. Social Studies of Science 32 (2): 235 296.

Dickel S & Ferdinand JP & Petschow U (2014): Shared Machine Shops as Real-life Laboratories. Journal of Peer Production (5).

Dickel S & Franzen M (2016) The “Problem of Extension” Revisited: New Modes of Digital Participation in Science. Journal of Science Communication 15(1): 1 17.

Finke P (2014) Citizen Science: Das unterschätzte Wissen der Laien. München: oekom verlag.

Franzoni C & Sauermann H (2014) Crowd Science: the Organization of Scientific Research in Open Collaborative Projects. Research Policy 43(1): 1 20.

Gaskell G & Eyck TT & Jackson J & Veltri G (2005) Imagining Nanotechnology: Cultural Support for Technological Innovation in Europe and the United States. Public Understanding of Science 14(1): 81 90.

Grunwald A (2014). The Hermeneutic Side of Responsible Research and Innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation 1(3): 274 291.

Haklay M (2012) Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information: Overview and Typology of Participation. In Sui D & Elwood S & Goodchild M (eds) Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice, Berlin: Springer, 105 122.

Hippel E (2005) Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hörl E (2013) A Thousand Ecologies: The Process of Cyberneticization and General Ecology. In Diedrichsen D & Franke A (eds) The Whole Earth. California and the Disappearance of the Outside, Berlin: Sternberg Press, 121-130.

Jalbert, K (2016) Building Knowledge Infrastructures for Empowerment: A Study of Grassroots Water Monitoring Networks in the Marcellus Shale. Science & Technology Studies 29(2).

Jasanoff S (2003) Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science. Minerva 41(3): 223 44.

Knorr-Cetina K (1997) Sociality with Objects: Social Relations in Postsocial Knowledge Societies. Theory, Culture & Society 14(4): 1 30.

Latour B (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

——— (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Lösch A & Schneider C (2016) Transforming Power/Knowledge Apparatuses: The Smart Grid in the German Energy Transition. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 29(3): 262-284.

Maasen S & Dickel S & Schneider C (2017) [forthcoming] TechnoScienceSociety: An Introduction. In: Maasen S & Dickel S & Schneider C (eds) Sociology of the sciences yearbook. TechnoScienceSociety. Technological Reconfigurations of Science and Society, Dordrecht: Springer VS.

Marres N (2012) Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mumford L (1970) The Myth of the Machine. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Nordmann A (2011) The Age of Technoscience. In: Nordmann A & Radder H & Schiemann G (eds) Science Transformed? Debating Claims of an Epochal Break Pittsburgh, Pa. University of Pittsburgh Press: 19-30.

Nordmann A (2016) Enhancing Machine Nature. In: Hurlbut JB, Tirosh-Samuelson H. (eds) Perfecting Human Futures, Wiesbaden: Springer, 195–214.

Nordmann A & Schwarz A (2010) Lure of the ‘Yes’: the Seductive Power of Technoscience. In Kaiser M & Kurath M & Maasen S & Rehmann-Sutter C (eds) Governing Future Technologies: Nanotechnology and the Rise of an Assessment Regime, Dordrecht, New York: Springer: 255-277.

Roco MC & Bainbridge WS (2003) Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Schrock AR (2016) Civic hacking as data activism and advocacy. A history from publicity to open government data. New Media & Society 18: 581 599.

Serrano Sanz F & Holocher-Ertl T & Kieslinger B & Sanz Garcia F & Silva CG (2014) White Paper on Citizen Science for Europe. Unpublished manuscript.

Thrift N (2011) Lifeworld Inc—and What to do About it. Environment and Planning: Society and Space 29 (1): 5 26.

Tkacz N (2015) Wikipedia and the politics of openness. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.

Urry J (2016) What is the future? Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press.

Published
2019-05-15