Escaping Numbers?

Intimate Accounting and the challenge to numbers in Australia’s ‘Education Revolution’

  • Radhika Gorur


Numbers have long been associated with statecraft. In bureaucratic processes of accounting, regulation was effected by forming centres of calculation. This paper suggests that contemporary post-bureaucratic regimes are evolving new forms of accounting, in which the centre inserts itself into individual sites to exercise authority. This ‘intimate accounting’ involves technologies of transparency through which individual sites such as schools are required to declare intimate information publicly. In turn, the public, armed with information, is exhorted to become informed and to exercise influence on institutions to excel and to hold them to account. Using the case of Australia’s ‘Education Revolution’, this paper describes the processes of intimate accounting. It then explores the efforts to resist, subvert and undo such calculations. Finally, it speculates on why these calculations have continued to appear robust in the face of opposition and what would need to be done to escape or resist such calculations.   

Keywords: Sociology of Numbers; Education Policy and Numbers; Accountability  


Download data is not yet available.


ACARA (2018) School Profile Methodist Ladies College. Available at: (accessed 4 January 2018)

Asdal K (2011) The Office: The weakness of numbers and the production of non-authority. Accounting, Organizations and Society 36: 1-9.

Australian Education Union (2010) Professional Voice (Winter ed. Vol. The NAPLAN Debate): AEU.

Callon M (1986) Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: the Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In: Law J (ed), Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge? London & Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp.

Callon M Lascoumes P and Barthe Y (2009) Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge & London: MIT Press.

Callon M and Law J (2005) On qualculation, agency, and otherness. Environment and Planning D-Society & Space 23(5): 717-733. doi: DOI 10.1068/d353t

Cochoy F (2002) Une Sociologie du Packaging ou l'Aêne de Buridan Face au Marche¨[A sociology of packaging, or Buridan's ass in the face of the market. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Commonwealth of Australia (2008b) Quality Education: The Case for an Education Revolution in our Schools. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

Commonwealth of Australia (2010a) Delivering the Education Revolution [Press release]. Available at: (accessed 4 January 2018).

Commonwealth of Australia (2010b) My School to provide unprecedented school performance data. Online: Australian Government. Available at: (accessed 4 January 2018).

Donovan S (2008) Transparency revolution promised for schools. In: Australian Broadcasting Corporation, PM. Radio National.

Education and Employment References Committee (2014) Effectiveness of the National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy Final Report. Canberra, ACT: The Senate.

Espeland WN and Stevens M (2008) A Sociology of Quantification. Archives of European Sociology XLIX(3): 401-436.

Gorur R (2011a) ANT on the PISA Trail: Following the statistical pursuit of certainty. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43(S1): 76-93.

Gorur R (2011b) Policy as Assemblage. European Educational Research Journal, 10(4): 611-622.

Gorur R (2013) My School, My Market. Discourse-Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 34(2): 214-230. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2013.770248

Gorur, R. (2015a). Producing Calculable Worlds: education at a glance. Discourse-Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 36(4): 578-595.

Gorur R (2015b) Assembling a Sociology of Numbers. In: Hamilton M, Maddox B and Addey C (eds) Literacy as Numbers – Researching the Politics and Practices of International Literacy Assessment. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-16.

Gorur R (2015c) The Performative Politics of NAPLAN and My School. In: Thompson G, Sellar S and Lingard R (Eds) National Testing and its Effects: Evidence from Australia. London: Routledge, pp.

Gorur R (2016) Seeing like PISA: A Cautionary Tale about the Performativity of International Assessments. European Educational Research Journal 15(5): 598–616. doi:10.1177/1474904116658299

Gorur R and Koyama JP (2013) The struggle to technicise in education policy. Australian Educational Researcher 40(5): 633-648. doi: 10.1007/s13384-013-0125-9

Harrison D (2010) Principals reject My School site. The Sydney Morning Herald. Available at: (accessed 4 January 2018).

Latour B (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Lingard R, Martino W and Rezai-Rashti G (2013) Testing Regimes, Accountabilities and Education Policy. Journal of Education Policy 28(5): 539-556.

Lippert I (2013) Enacting Environments: An Ethnography of the Digitalisation and Naturalisation of Emissions. PhD Dissertation in Sociology, University of Augsburg, Augsburg.

Methodist Ladies College (2018) Homepage, Available at: (accessed 16 January 2018).

Miller CA (2005) New Civic Epistemologies of Quantification: Making Sense of Indicators of Local and Global Sustainability. Science, Technology and Human Values 30(3): 403-432. (1997) Labour Party Manifesto, General Election 1997 [Archive]. Available at: (accessed 2 July. 2017).

Porter T (1994) Objectivity as Standarization: The Rhetoric of Impersonality in Measurement, Statistics, and Cost-Benefit Analysis. In: Megill A (ed) Rethinking Objectivity. Durham: Duke Univeristy Press, pp. 197-237.

Porter T (1995) Trust in Numbers - The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton & Chichester: Princeton University Press.

Power M (1997) The audit society: rituals of verification. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.

Rizvi F and Lingard B (2010) Globalizing Education Policy. Routledge.

Rose N (1991) Governing by numbers: Figuring out democracy. Accounting Organizations and Society 16(7): 673-692.

Sales L (2008) Julia Gillard joins Lateline. Radio Interview. In: Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Lateline.

Scott JC (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Some Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. Binghampton & New York: Vail-Ballou Press.

Simola H, Ozga J, Segerholm C and Varjo J (2011) Governing by Numbers: The rise of data in education. In: Ozga J, Dahler-Larsen P, Segerholm C and Simola H (eds) Fabricating Quality in Education: Data and governance in Europe. London & New York: Routledge, pp. 96-106.

Steiner-Khamsi G (2015) Foreword. In: Hamilton M, Maddox B and Addey C (eds) Literacy as numbers: Researching the politics and practices of international literacy assessment regimes. CITY: Cambridge University Press, pp.xi-xii.

Strathern M (2000) The Tyranny of Transparency. British Educational Research Journal 26(3): 309-321.

Strathern M (2003) New Accountabilities - Anthropological studies in audit, ethics and the academy. In: Strathern M (ed) Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy. Florence: Taylor and Francis, pp.

Thomson P (2002) Schooling the Rustbelt Kids. Allen & Unwin NSW

Thomson S, De Bortoli L and Underwood C (2016) PISA 2015 - A first look at Australia's results. Camberwell, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.

Tomazin F (2013) Schools caught cheating on NAPLAN. The Age. Available from (accessed 4 January 2018)

Tomazin F and Tovey J (2009) Schools are failing us, says Gillard. The Sydney Morning Herald. Available at: (accessed 4 January 2018)

Williss M (2010) Why ICSEA fails our schools. Available at: (accessed 28 May 2010)