Something and Nothing

On Undoing the Algorithm, Deletion, Accountability and Value

  • Daniel Neyland


This paper explores the ways that qualities and quantities can be enacted, bringing realities into being and how qualities and quantities might also be undone, and sometimes in order to do realities better. In particular, undoing has become a focus for accountably resisting quantification. Utilising the neologism of the qualculation, the paper begins by exploring a particular kind of undoing: deletion. Questions are raised regarding the legal, technical and organisational aspects of deletion and then how we might bring ideas from Science and Technology Studies (STS) together to pose questions of deletion and accountability. Subsequently, data from a study of the development of an algorithmic deletion system is presented to explore qualculation, undoing, deletion, accountability and market value in action. The paper will conclude with a discussion of the nature of undoing qualculations, of how undoing is a constitutive action in itself.


Download data is not yet available.


Accountability Principle (2010) Available at: (accessed xxx

Beer D (2009) Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious. New Media & Society 11(6): 985-1002.

Bennett, C. and Raab, C. (2003) The governance of privacy – policy instruments in global perspective (Ashgate, Hampshire).

Bernal, P. (2011) 'A Right to Delete?' European Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 2, No.2.

Callon, M. (1998) The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwells

Callon, M. (2007) An Essay on the Growing Contribution of Economic Markets to the Proliferation of the Social. Theory, Culture, Society. 24: 139-63.

Callon, M. and Law, J. (2005) On Qualcuation, Agency and Otherness, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23: 717-33.

Callon, M., C. Meadel, and V. Rabehariosa. 2002. The Economy of Qualities. Economy and Society. 31(2): 194-217.

Cochoy, F. (2002) Une Sociologie du Packaging ou l'Aê ne de Buridan Face au Marche¨ [A sociology of packaging, or Buridan's ass in the face of the market] (Presses Universitaires de France, Paris)

Cochoy, F. (2009) Driving a Shopping Cart from STS to Business, and the Other Way Round: On the Introduction of Shopping Carts in American Grocery Stores (1936—1959). Organization. 16: 31-55.

Espeland, W. and Sauder, M. 2007. Rankings and Reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology 113(1): 1-40.

Gallagher, C. (2004) 'CCTV and human rights: The fish and the bicycle?', Surveillance and Society 2(2/3): 270–92.

Gillespie, T. (2013) 'The Relevance of Algorithms', in T. Gillespie, P. Boczkowski, and K. Foot. (eds) Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Goffey, A. (2008) Algorithm, pp. 15-21, in M. Fuller (ed) Software Studies (MIT Press, London)

Goold, B. (2009) Building It In: The role of Privacy Enhancing Technologies in the regulation of surveillance and data collection, in Goold, B. and Neyland, D. (2009) New Directions in Surveillance and Privacy. Devon: Willan.

Haraway, D. (1988), 'Situated Knowledges: the Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective', Feminist Studies, 14 (3): 575–599,

Hetherington, K. and Lee, N. (2000), Social order and the blank figure. Environment and Planning D, Society and Space, Vol. 18 (2): 69–184.

Holm, P. (2007) Which Way is Up on Callon? in Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, and L. Siu (eds) NJ, USA: Princeton University Press pp. 225-43

ICO (2006) Data Protection Technical Guidance Notes on PETs (11th April)

Introna, L. (2013) 'Algorithms, Performativity and Governability', delivered at the Governing Algorithms Conference, NY, USA, May 16-17, 2013, available here:

Lash, S. (2007) 'Power After Hegemony' Theory, Culture and Society, 24(3): 55-78

Livingston, E., (2006), 'The context of proving', Social Studies of Science, 36 (1): 39–68.

MacKenzie, D. (1993) Inventing Accuracy, London: MIT Press

MacKenzie, D. (2009) Making Things the Same: Gases, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets. Accounting, Organisations and Society. 34: 440-55.

Mayer-Schonberger, V. (2009) Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age, Princeton University Press, NJ, USA.

Mitchell, T. (2002) Rule of Experts, Berkley, CA, USA: University of California Press

Muniesa, F., Milo, Y. and Callon, M. (2007) Market Devices Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell

Neyland, D. (2007), 'Achieving transparency: the visible, invisible and divisible in academic accountability networks', Organization, 14 (4): 499–516.

Neyland, D. and Coopmans, C. (forthcoming 2014) Visual Accountability, Sociological Review O' Harrow, R. (2005) No Place to Hide Free Press; New York

Porter, T. (1995) Trust in Numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life NJ, USA: Princeton University Press

Rosen, J. (2001) The Unwanted Gaze: The destruction of privacy in America (Vintage Press, New York, USA).

Rosenberg, J. (1969) The Death of Privacy Random House; New York

Rule, J. (2009) The limits of privacy protection in Neyland, D. And Goold, B. (2009) Introduction in B. Goold and D. Neyland (eds) 'New Directions in Surveillance and Privacy' (Willan Publishing, Devon)

Simakova, E. and Neyland, D. (2008) Marketing Mobile Futures: Assembling Constituencies and Narrating Compelling Stories for an Emerging Technology. Marketing Theory 8(1): 91-116.

Sjögren, E. and Helgesson, C-F. (2007) The Q(u)ALYfying hand: health economics and medicine in the shaping of Swedish markets for subsidized pharmaceuticals. Sociological Review 55(2): 215-240

Slavin, K. (2011). How algorithms shape our world, available from:

Spring, T. (2011). How Google, Facebook and Amazon run the internet, available from: google-facebook-andamazonrun-the-internet/

Stalder, F. (2002) 'Privacy is not the antidote to surveillance', Surveillance and Society 1(1): 120–24.

Strathern, M. (2002) 'Abstraction and decontextualisation: An anthropological comment', pp. 302-13 in S. Woolgar (ed), Virtual Society? Technology, Cyberbole, Reality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thrift, N. (2004) Movement-Space: The changing domain of thinking resulting from resulting from new kinds of spatial awareness, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34(4): 582-604

Verran, H. (2012) Number in Wakeford, N. and Lury, C. (eds) Inventive Methods. London: Routledge, pp. 110-24.

Woolgar, S. and Neyland, D. (2013) Mundane Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press