Pepper as Imposter
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.121864Abstract
References
Allen D (2013) Introduction - The sociology of Care Work (Special Issue). Sociology of Health & Illness 35(6): 928-938.
Arnelid M, Harrison K and Johnson E (2022) What Does it Mean to Measure a Smile? Assigning Numerical Values to Emotions. Valuation Studies 9(1): 79-107.
https://doi.org/10.3384/VS.2001-5992.2022.9.1.79-107
Barad K (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway. Durham: Duke University press.
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12101zq
Baxter P, Kennedy J, Senft E, Lemaignan S and Belpaeme T (2009) From Characterising three years of HRI to methodology and reporting recommendations. ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. Christchurch, New Zealand pp. 391-398, doi: 10.1109/HRI.2016.7451777.
https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451777
Benjamin R (2019) Race After Technology. London: Polity.
Cavendish C (2018) Robot carers for the elderly are now a reality in Japan but do we want them here? The Times. Available at: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/robot-carers-for-the-elderly-are-now-a-reality-in-japan-but-do-we-want-them-here-mw8zpw0zd (accessed 3.7.2023).
Costanza-Chock S (2020) Design Justice. Cambridge: MIT Press.
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12255.001.0001
DeFalco A (2020) Towards a theory of Posthuman Care. Real Humans and Caring Robots. Body and Society 26(3): 31-60.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X20917450
Fischer B, Östlund B and Peine A (2020) Of Robots and humans: Creating user representations in practice. Social Studies of Science 50(2): 221-244.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720905116
Garcia I (2021) A New AI Lexicon: Artificial Identity Cataracts. AI Now Institute. https://medium.com/a-new-ai-lexicon/a-new-ai-lexicon-artificial-identity-cataracts-29f73c32e6bb
Gleisner J and Johnson E (2021) Caring for affective subjects produced in intimate healthcare examinations. Health 27(3): 303-322.
https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593211020072
Harrison K (2019) Automated and/or authentic intimacy: What can we learn about contemporary intimacy from the case of Ashley Madison's bots? First Monday 24(10).
https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i10.10250
Harrison K and Johnson E (2023) Affective corners as a problematic for design interactions. Transactions on Human Robotics Interactions. https://doi.org/10.1145/3596452.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3596452
Harrison K, Somasundaram K and Loutfi A (forthcoming) The Imperfectly Relatable Robot: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Failures in Human-Robot Relations. In Johnson E (ed) What that Robot Made Me Feel. Boston: MIT Press.
Hochschild AR (1983) The Managed Heart. Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of CA Press.
James N (1992) Care = organization + physical labour + emotional labour. Sociology of Health & Illness 14(4): 488-509.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep10493127
Johnson J [Latour B] (1988) Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: The Sociology of a Door-Closer. Social Problems 35(3): 298-310.
https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1988.35.3.03a00070
Latour B (2004) Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry 30(2): 225-248.
https://doi.org/10.1086/421123
Lindén L and Lydahl D (2021) Editorial (introduction to the special issue on care). Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies 9(1): 3-12.
https://doi.org/10.5324/njsts.v9i1.4000
Lipp B and Maasen S (2022) Techno-bio-politics. On Interfacing Life with and Through Technology. NanoEthics 16: 133-150.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-022-00413-2
Martin A, Myers N and Viseu A (2015) The politics of Care in technoscience. Social Studies of Science 45(5): 625-641.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715602073
Murphy M (2015) Unsettling care: Troubling transnational itineraries of care in feminist health practices. Social studies of Science 45(5): 717-737.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715589136
Puig de la Bellacasa M (2011) Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science 41(1): 85-106.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710380301
Rea D, Geiskkovitch D and Young J (2017) Wizard of Awwws: Exploring the Psychological Impact on the Researchers in Social HRI Experiments. Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACI/IEEE International Conference on Hurman-Robot Interaction. March 2017, pp. 21-29.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3029798.3034782
Rhee J (2018) The Robot Imaginary. St. Paul: The University of Minnesota Press.
Riek L (2012) Wizard of Oz studies in HRI: a systematic review and new reporting guidelines. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 1(1): 119-136.
https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.1.1.Riek
Robertson J (2017) Robo sapiens japanicus. Robots, Gender, Family and the Japanese Nation. Berkely: University of CA Press.
https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520283190.001.0001
Sutton SJ (2020) Gender Ambiguous, not Genderless: Designing Gender in Voice User Interfaces (VUIs) with Sensitivity. Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI '20). ACM 11, 1-8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3405755.3406123.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3405755.3406123
Sparrow R (2020) Robotics has a race problem. Science, Technology & Human Values 45(3): 538-560.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919862862
Sparrow R and Sparrow L (2006) In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds and Machines 16: 141-161.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-006-9030-6
Strengers Y and Kennedy J (2020) The Smart Wife. Cambridge: MIT Press.
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12482.001.0001
Suchman L (2007) Human-machine reconfigurations: plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808418
Suchman L (2011) Subject Objects. Feminist Theory 12(12): 119-145.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700111404205
Søndergaard DM (2019) On Humanoids, Avatars and the Rest of Us. In Hasse C and Søndergaard DM (eds) Designing Robots, Designing Humans Routledge: London, pp. 21-39.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315227207-3
Søndergaard, ML and Hansen LK (2018) Intimate Futures: Staying with the Trouble of Digital Personal Assistants through Design Fiction. DIS 2018. June 9-13.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196766
Søraa R, Nyvoll P, Tøndel G, Fosch-Villaronga E and Serrano J (2021) The social dimension of domesticating technology: Interactions between older adults, caregivers, and robots in the home. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 167: 1-13.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120678
Treusch P, Berger A and Rosner D (2020) Useful Uselessness? Teaching Robots to Knit with Humans. DIS '20, July 6-10, 2020 Eindhoven, Netherlands.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395582
Tronto JC (1993) Moral Boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.
Vogel E, Moats D, Woolgar S and Helgesson CF (2021) Thinking with Imposters: The Imposter as Analytic. In: Woolgar S, Vogel E, Moats D and Helgesson CF (eds) The Imposter as Social Theory. Bristol: Bristol University Press. pp1-30.
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1p6hphs.6
Winkle K, McMillan D, Arnelid M et al.(2023) Feminist Human-robot Interaction: Disentangling Power, Principles and Practice for Better, More Ethical HRI. HRI'23 ACM ISBN 978-1-4503-9964-7/23/03
https://doi.org/10.1145/3568162.3576973
Woolgar S, Vogel E, Moats D and Helgesson CF (eds) (2021) The Imposter as Social Theory. Thinking with Gatecrashers, cheats and charlatans. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
https://doi.org/10.56687/9781529213102
Wright J (2023) Robots Won't Save Japan. An Ethnography of Eldercare Automation. Cornell: Cornell University Press.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2024-09-15 (2)
- 2023-07-20 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ericka Johnson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Terms & Conditions
This Science & Technology Studies website ("Site") is owned and operated by The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies (“Society”). The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies and its publication Science & Technology Studies are non-profit organizations.
By accessing or using the Site, you agree to be bound by the terms and conditions below ("Terms and Conditions"). These Terms and Conditions incorporate by reference and include the Site's Privacy Policy and any guidelines, rules or disclaimers that may be posted and updated on specific web pages or on notices that are sent to you. If you do not agree with these Terms and Conditions, please do not use this Site.
The Society reserves the right to change, modify, add or remove portions of these Terms and Conditions at its discretion at any time and without prior notice. Please check this page periodically for any modifications. Your continued use of this Site following the posting of any changes will mean that you have accepted the changes.
Copyrights and Limitations on Use
Content on this website is protected by Creative Commons license CC BY 4.0. The copyright of articles remains with the authors but the license permits other users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the published articles. Using and sharing the content is permitted as long as original materials are appropriately credited. Metadata (e.g. the article title) is an exeption - this is licensed under CC0 that permits the distribution of the article information - not content - in archives and databases.
The Site may contain robot exclusion headers, and by using the Site you agree that you will not use any robots, spiders, crawlers or other automated downloading programs or devices to access, search, index, monitor or copy any Content. The harvesting of postal or email addresses from the Site for purposes of sending unsolicited or unauthorized commercial material, is prohibited.
You may not use the services on the Site to publish or distribute any information (including software or other content) that is illegal; violates or infringes upon the rights of any other person; is abusive, hateful, profane, pornographic, threatening or vulgar; contains errors, viruses or other harmful components; or is otherwise actionable by law. Science & Technology Studies may at any time exercise editorial control over the content of any information or material that is submitted or distributed through its facilities and/or services.
You may not, without the approval of Science & Technology Studies, use the Site to publish or distribute any advertising, promotional material, or solicitation to other users of the Site to use any goods or services. For example (but without limitation), you may not use the Site to conduct any business, to solicit the performance of any activity that is prohibited by law, or to solicit other users to become subscribers of other information services. Similarly, you may not use the Site to download and redistribute public information or shareware for personal gain or use the facilities and/or services to distribute multiple copies of public domain information or shareware.
Trademarks
All trademarks appearing on this Site are the property of their respective owners.
Links to Other Sites
The Site may contain hyperlinks to other sites or resources that are provided solely for your convenience. Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability of external sites or resources linked to the Site, and does not endorse and is not responsible or liable for any content, advertising, products or other materials on or available from such sites or resources. Transactions that occur between you and any third party are strictly between you and the third party and are not the responsibility of Science & Technology Studies. Due to the fact that Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability or accuracy of these outside resources or their contents, you should review the terms and conditions and privacy policies of these linked sites, as their policies may differ from ours.
Last revised: 3 Aug 2020
