How Sociotechnical Systems Adapt to Change
Reproductive Imaginaries in the Co-production of Assisted Reproductive Technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.120660Abstract
This paper addresses the topic of the dynamics of sociotechnical change of reproductive technologies and, in particular, the relationship between sociotechnical systems as described by TP Hughes and their environments. The co-production approach and sociotechnical imaginaries defined by S Jasanoff and SH Kim allow to explain the dynamics of technical change through the interweaving of technoscientific and social practices; and the concept of ‘reproductive imaginaries’ provides a better analysis of the back and forth adjustment between the system and its environment in a way that avoids the soft determinism that still persists in traditional accounts of sociotechnical change. I argue that reproductive technologies are co-produced with its environment in dialectical processes through specific technologies and reproductive imaginaries. Finally, I defend that this system performed adaptations even when it is mature.
References
Agramunt S, Checa MA and Carreras R (2011). Eficacia de los tratamientos reproductivos. In: Matorras R (ed.) La Infertilidad en España: Situación Actual y Perspectivas. Madrid: SEF, pp. 123-134.
Alkorta I (2006) Los derechos reproductivos de las mujeres vascas en el cambio de siglo: de la anticoncepción a la reproducción asistida. Vasconia 35: 345-371.
Asensio C and Palma M (2018) Estudio de la efectividad y de la seguridad de la criopreservación de ovocitos y de tejido ovárico para la preservación de la fertilidad en pacientes oncológicas. Madrid: Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades.
Badinter E (1980) L'amor en plus. Historie de l'amor maternel (XVIIe-XX siècle). Paris: Flamarion.
Beauvoir S (1949) Le deuxième sexe. Paris: Gallimard.
Bishop L, Aharon D, Gordon C, New E and Decherney A (2018) IVF from Incubation to Injection. Fertility and Sterility 110(2): 205-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.005
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.005
Browm S and Steirteghem A (2018) European Society of Human Reproduction and Embriology and the advance of Assisted Reproduction. Fertility and Sterility 110 (2): 303-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.005
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.005
Brown S and Tarlatzis B (2005) ESHRE: the first 21 years. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.eshre.eu/Home/About-us/History.aspx
Calhaz-Jorge C, De Geyter C h, Kupka M S, et al. (2020) Survey on ART and IUI: legislation, regulation, funding and registries in European countries: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Human Reproduction Open 1, hoz044, https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoz044
https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoz044
Casado R (2020) KKR adquiere IVI-RMA por 3.000 millones para fusionarla con Generalife. elEconomista.es, 28 March. Available at: https://www.eleconomista.es/empresas-finanzas/noticias/11689378/03/22/KKR-ultima-la-compra-de-IVIRMA-por-3000-millones-para-fusionarla-con-Generalife-.html (accessed 17.5. 2022).
Cohen G, Daley G and Adashi E (2017) Disruptive reproductive technologies. Science Translational Medicine 9: eaag2959. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aag2959
https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aag2959
Cohen J, Trounson A, Dawson K, et al. (2005) The early days of IVF outside the UK. Human Reproduction Update 11(5): 439-459. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmi016
https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmi016
Donoso S (2012) La familia lesboparental: ¿reinvención de la familia? PhD Thesis, Universidad de Barcelona, Spain.
Edwards RG and Sharpe DJ (1971) Social values and research in Human Embryology. Nature 231: 87-91.
https://doi.org/10.1038/231087a0
Edwards RG and Steptoe P (1980) A Matter of Life. The Story of a Medical Breakthrough. New York: William Morrow and Company.
Elcacho J (2012) Entrevista. Ana Veiga. Barcelona Metròpolis. Capital en transformació, 86: 6-9.
Felt U, Fouché R, Miller C. et al. (eds.) (2017) The handbook of science and technology studies. Cambridge, MA and London, MA: MIT Press.
Ferber S, Marks N and Mackie V (2020) IVF and Assisted Reproduction. A Global History. Ebook: Palgrave Macmillan Singapur https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7895-3.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7895-3
Fernández-Jimeno N (2019) Our bodies, our decision: reproductive technologies and public participation. In Pérez Sedeño E, Almendros LS, García Dauder S and Ortega Arjonilla E (eds.) Knowledges, Practices and Activism from Feminist Epistemologies. Madrid: Vernon Press, pp. 115-134.
Fernández-Jimeno (2022) The (In)Fertile Body: Discourses and Experiences of Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Spain. In Guerzoni, CS and Mattalucci, C. Reproductive Governance and Bodily Materiality (Emerald Studies in Reproduction, Culture and Society. Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80071-438-020221013
https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80071-438-020221013
Franklin S, Lury C and Stacey, J (2000) Global Nature, Global Culture. London: Sage.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446219768
Franklin S (2002) Embodied progress. A cultural account of assisted conception. Ebook: Taylor and Francis e-Library. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203414965
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203414965
Franklin S (2013) Biological Relatives. iVF, Stem Cells, and the Future of kinship. Durham: Duke University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822378259
Geels F (2007) Transformations of Large Technical Systems: A Multilevel Analysis of the Dutch Highway System (1950-2000). Science, Technology, & Human Values 32(2): 123-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243906293883
https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243906293883
Hobsbawn E (1995) Age of Extremes, The Short Twentieth Century 1914-1991. London: Abacus.
Hughes TP (1983) Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hughes TP (1987) The evolution of large technological systems. In: Bijker W, Hughes TP and Pinch T (eds.) The Social Construction of Technological Systems. New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge MA and London: MIT Press, pp. 51-82.
Hughes TP (2012) The evolution of large technological systems. In: Bijker W, Hughes TP and Pinch T (eds.) The Social Construction of Technological Systems. New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press, pp. 45-76.
Hughes TP (1994) Technological Momentum. In: Smith M and Marx L (eds.) Does Technology Drive History? The Dilema of Technological Determinism. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press, pp. 101-113.
Imaz ME (2014) Maternidades lesbianas, nuevas formas familiares y derecho a elegir. Grafo Working Papers 3(2): 6-17. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/grafowp.10
https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/grafowp.10
Inhorn MC (2020) Reprint: Where has the quest for conception taken us? Lessons from anthropology and sociology. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online 11: 110-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2021.03.001.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2021.03.001
Inhorn MC, Birenbaum-Carmeli D, Yu R and Patrizio P (2022) Egg Freezing at the End of Romance: A Technology of Hope, Despair, and Repair. Science, Technology and Human Values 47: 53-84.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243921995892
Jasanoff S and Kim SH (2009) Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47: 119-146. DOI 10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4
Jasanoff S and Kim SH (eds.) (2015) Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226276663.001.0001
Jasanoff S and Simmet H (2021) Renewing the future: Excluded imaginaries in the global energy transition. Energy Research & Social Science 80: 102205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102205
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102205
Jasanoff S (ed.) (2004) States of Knowledge. The co-production of science and social order. London and New York: Routledge.
Johnson M, Franklin S, Cottingham M et al. (2010) Why the Medical Research Council refused Robert Edwards and Patrick Steptoe support for research on human conception in 1971. Human Reproduction 25(9): 2157-2174.
https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq155
Johnson M (2011) Robert Edwards: the path to IVF. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 23(2): 245-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.04.010.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.04.010
Johnson M and Elder K (2015) Symposium: The History of the first IVF births. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online 1(1): 1-70.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2015.04.006
Johnson M (2019) IVF: the women who helped make it happen. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online 8: 1-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2018.11.002
Knibiehler Y (2001) Historia de las madres y de la maternidad en Occidente, translated by Mahler P. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.
Lafuente S (2017) Bioeconomías reproductivas: los óvulos en la biología pos fecundación in vitro. PhD Thesis, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain.
Lafuente S (2021) Mercados reproductivos: crisis, deseo y desigualdad. Iruñea: Katakrak Liburuak.
Leeton J (2004) The early history of IVF in Australia and its contribution to the world (1970-1990). Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 44(6): 495-501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00305.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00305.x
Mamo L (2007) Queering Reproduction: Achieving Pregnancy in the Age of Technoscience. Durham: Duke University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822390220
Mastroyannis C (1993) Gamete intrafallopian transfer: ethical considerations, historical development of the procedure, and comparison with other advanced reproductive technologies. Fertility and Sterility 60(3): 389-402.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)56148-2
D Melo-Martín I (1998) Making Babies: Biomedical Technologies, Reproductive Ethics, and Public Policy. Dordrecht: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2159-2
Muñoz A (2020) El grupo de fertilidad IVI-RMA vende su negocio en Oriente Medio por 90 millones. elEconomista.es, 15 January. Available at: https://www.eleconomista.es/empresas-finanzas/noticias/10298856/01/20/El-grupo-de-fertilidad-IVIRMA-vende-su-negocio-en-Oriente-Medio-por-90-millones.html (accessed 17.5.2022)
National Commission for Assisted Human Reproduction Report (2022,) Registro de Centros y Servicios de Reproducción Humana Asistida. Report to the public, 25 April 2022. Available at: https://cnrha.sanidad.gob.es/registros/busqueda.htm (accessed 25.4.2022)
Newton I (1999) The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, translated by Cohen IB and Whitman A. Berkeley, Los Ángeles and London: University of California Press.
Palermo G, O'Neill C, Chow S, et al. (2018) The story of ICSI. Fertility and Sterility 110(2): 195-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.005
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.005
Payne J (2016) Grammars of Kinship: Biological Motherhood and Assisted Reproduction in the Age of Epigenetics. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 41(3): 483-506. https://doi.org/10.1086/684233
https://doi.org/10.1086/684233
Richardson S (2021) The Maternal Imprint: the contested science of maternal-fetal effects. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226807072.001.0001
Royo R, González L and Suárez M (2020) Familia, género y cambio social: un acercamiento a los valores familiares en el imaginario colectivo de la sociedad española. In: Silvestre M (ed.) Valores en la era de la incertidumbre: individualismos y solidaridades. Madrid: Los Libros de la Catarata, pp. 43-68.
Rutherford J and Coutard O (2014) Urban energy transitions: Places, processes and politics of socio-technical change. Urban Studies 51(7): 1353-1377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013500090
https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013500090
Salter B (2022) Markets, Cultures and the Politics Values: The Case of Assisted Reproductive Technology. Science, Technology and Human Values 47(1):3-28.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243921991929
Sfakianoudis K, Rapani A, Grigoriadis S, et al. (2020). Novel Approaches in Addressing Ovarian Insufficiency in 2019: Are We There Yet? Cell Transplantation 29: 1-21. doi: 10.1177/0963689720926154.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963689720926154
Shove E and Walker G (2010) Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life. Research Policy 39(4): 471-476. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.019
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.019
Smith A, Voss JP and Grin J (2010) Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Research Policy 39(4): 435-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023
Sociedad Española de Fertilidad (SEF Registry 2002-2019) Informes Registro Nacional de Actividad-Registro SEF. Report to the public 2002-2019. Available at: https://www.registrosef.com/index.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2f#Anteriores (accessed 25.4.2022).
Sovacool B and Hess D (2017) Ordering theories: Typologies and conceptual frameworks for sociotechnical change. Social Studies of Science 47(5): 703-750. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717709363
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717709363
Sovacool B, Lovell K and Ting M (2018) Reconfiguration, Contestation, and Decline: Conceptualizing Mature Large Technical Systems. Science, Technology, & Human Values 43(6): 1066-1097. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918768074
https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918768074
Orden SND/1215/2021 (2021) Common services of the National Health System. Available at: https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2021/11/09/pdfs/BOE-A-2021-18287.pdf (accessed 23.7.2022).
Smietana M, Thompson C and Twine FW (2018) Making and Breaking Families - Reading Queer Reproductions, Stratified Reproduction and Reproductive Justice Together. Introduction to the Symposium on Making Families: Transnational Surrogacy, Queer Kinship, and Reproductive Justice. Reprod. BioMed. Soc. Online 7: 112-130.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2018.11.001
Stanworth M (ed.) (1987) Reproductive Technologies. Gender, Motherhood and Medicine. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Strathern M (1992) After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Tesarik J, Bahceci M, Ozcán C et al. (1999). Restoration of fertility by in-vitro spermatogenesis. Lancet 353(9152): 555-556. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)04784-9
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)04784-9
Tesarik J, Mendoza C and Testart J (1995) Viable embryos from injection of round spermatids into oocytes. New England Journal of Medicine 333(8): 525. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199508243330819.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199508243330819
Tesarik J, Pilka L, Dvorak M, et al. (1983) Oocyte recovery, in vitro insemination, and transfer into the oviduct after its microsurgical repair at a single laparotomy. Fertility and Sterility 39(4): 472-475.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)46934-7
Thompson C (2005) Making parents: the ontological choreography of reproductive technologies. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
Tubert S (ed.) (1996) Figuras de la madre. Madrid: Cátedra.
van de Wiel L (2020) Freezing Fertility. Oocyte Cryopreservation and the Gender Politics of Aging. New York: New York University Press.
https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479868148.001.0001
Vertommen S, Pavone V and Nahman M (2022). Global Fertility Chain: An Integrative Political Economy Approach to Understanding the Reproductive Bioeconomy. Science, Technology and Human Values 47(1): 112-145.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243921996460
Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson D, Dyer S, et al. (2017) The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care. Fertility and Sterility 108(3): 393-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.005
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2025-05-15 (2)
- 2024-04-03 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Natalia Fernández-Jimeno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Terms & Conditions
This Science & Technology Studies website ("Site") is owned and operated by The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies (“Society”). The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies and its publication Science & Technology Studies are non-profit organizations.
By accessing or using the Site, you agree to be bound by the terms and conditions below ("Terms and Conditions"). These Terms and Conditions incorporate by reference and include the Site's Privacy Policy and any guidelines, rules or disclaimers that may be posted and updated on specific web pages or on notices that are sent to you. If you do not agree with these Terms and Conditions, please do not use this Site.
The Society reserves the right to change, modify, add or remove portions of these Terms and Conditions at its discretion at any time and without prior notice. Please check this page periodically for any modifications. Your continued use of this Site following the posting of any changes will mean that you have accepted the changes.
Copyrights and Limitations on Use
Content on this website is protected by Creative Commons license CC BY 4.0. The copyright of articles remains with the authors but the license permits other users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the published articles. Using and sharing the content is permitted as long as original materials are appropriately credited. Metadata (e.g. the article title) is an exeption - this is licensed under CC0 that permits the distribution of the article information - not content - in archives and databases.
The Site may contain robot exclusion headers, and by using the Site you agree that you will not use any robots, spiders, crawlers or other automated downloading programs or devices to access, search, index, monitor or copy any Content. The harvesting of postal or email addresses from the Site for purposes of sending unsolicited or unauthorized commercial material, is prohibited.
You may not use the services on the Site to publish or distribute any information (including software or other content) that is illegal; violates or infringes upon the rights of any other person; is abusive, hateful, profane, pornographic, threatening or vulgar; contains errors, viruses or other harmful components; or is otherwise actionable by law. Science & Technology Studies may at any time exercise editorial control over the content of any information or material that is submitted or distributed through its facilities and/or services.
You may not, without the approval of Science & Technology Studies, use the Site to publish or distribute any advertising, promotional material, or solicitation to other users of the Site to use any goods or services. For example (but without limitation), you may not use the Site to conduct any business, to solicit the performance of any activity that is prohibited by law, or to solicit other users to become subscribers of other information services. Similarly, you may not use the Site to download and redistribute public information or shareware for personal gain or use the facilities and/or services to distribute multiple copies of public domain information or shareware.
Trademarks
All trademarks appearing on this Site are the property of their respective owners.
Links to Other Sites
The Site may contain hyperlinks to other sites or resources that are provided solely for your convenience. Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability of external sites or resources linked to the Site, and does not endorse and is not responsible or liable for any content, advertising, products or other materials on or available from such sites or resources. Transactions that occur between you and any third party are strictly between you and the third party and are not the responsibility of Science & Technology Studies. Due to the fact that Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability or accuracy of these outside resources or their contents, you should review the terms and conditions and privacy policies of these linked sites, as their policies may differ from ours.
Last revised: 3 Aug 2020
