The Production of Infrastructural Value and the Extension of the Electricity Grid
Demand-Side Response and Aggregators as Temporal Prospectors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.115273Abstract
Infrastructures have recently been conceptualised as in process and dynamic rather than fixed and obdurate. We introduce the notion of infrastructural value to draw attention to the specific value that can be produced in something in relation to its participation in an infrastructure, its operation and management. We analyse demand-side response (DSR) as a case of infrastructural extension where value is produced in already-existing electricity consuming devices, generating a return for their response to the ends of grid management. We track the work of aggregators who enrol clients and their devices into providing combined synchronised responses contracted with the grid operator. This involves aggregators in activities of temporal prospecting, legitimation, optimisation and coordination. We argue that the notion of infrastructural value helps to articulate the relations between the fluidity and flexing of infrastructural boundaries and value making practices and consider other ways that this category of value might be explored.
References
Angel J (2021) The Flexibility Fix: Low-Carbon Energy Transition in the United Kingdom and the Spatiotemporality of Capital. Annals of the American Association of Geographers. Epub ahead of print 22 September 2021. DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2021.1941745
https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2021.1941745
Bardhi F and Eckhardt GM. (2012) Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research 39 (4): 881-898.
https://doi.org/10.1086/666376
Bedwell B, Leygue C, Goulden M, et al. (2014) Apportioning energy consumption in the workplace: a review of issues in using metering data to motivate staff to save energy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 26 (10): 1196-1211
https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2014.978276
BEIS (2021) Appendix II: Smart Systems and Flexibility Plan Monitoring Framework. Monitoring Flexibility for a net zero electricity system. July 2021. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/transitioning-to-a-net-zero-energy-system-smart-systems-and-flexibility-plan-2021 (accessed Nov. 29, 2021).
Bennett J (2009) Vibrant Matter. A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv111jh6w
Bessy C and Chauvin P (2013) The Power of Market Intermediaries: From Information to Valuation Processes. Valuation Studies 1 (1): 83-117.
https://doi.org/10.3384/vs.2001-5992.131183
Birch K (2017) Rethinking Value in the Bio-economy: Finance, Assetization, and the Management of Value. Science, Technology & Human Values 42 (3): 460-490.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916661633
Blok A, Nakazora M and Winthereik B R (2016) Infrastructuring Environments. Science as Culture 25 (1): 1-22.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2015.1081500
Bolton R, Lagendijk V and Silvast A (2019) Grand visions and pragmatic integration: Exploring the evolution of Europe's electricity regime. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 32: 55-68,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.04.001
Bowker GC and Star LS (1999) Sorting things out: Classifications and its Consequences. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001
Bowker GB, Elyachar J, Kornberger M, Mennicken A, Miller P, Randa NJ and Pollock N (2019) Introduction to thinking infrastructures. In Kornberger M, Bowker GC, Elyachar J et al. (eds) Thinking Infrastructures. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20190000062001
Bridge G, Bouzarovski S, Bradshaw M et al. (2013) Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy. Energy Policy 53: 331-340.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066
Bridge G, Bulkeley H, Langley P, and Van Veelen B (2020) Pluralizing and problematizing carbon finance. Progress in Human Geography 44 (4): 724-742.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519856260
Brown CA and Pena JL (2016) Water Meters and Monthly Bills Meet Rural Brazilian Communities: Sociological Perspectives on Technical Objects for Water Management. World Development 84: 149-161.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.03.014
Calver P and Simcock N (2021) Demand response and energy justice: A critical overview of ethical risks and opportunities within digital, decentralised, and decarbonised futures. Energy Policy 151: 112198
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112198
Cardoso CA, Torriti J and Lorincz M (2020) Making demand side response happen: A review of barriers in commercial and public organisations. Energy Research & Social Science 64: 101443.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101443
Carlsson-Hyslop A (2016) Past Management of Energy Demand: Promotion and Adoption of Electric Heating in Britain 1945-1964. Environment and History 22 (1): 75-102.
https://doi.org/10.3197/096734016X14497391602242
Chiapello E (2018) Optimisation in the context of financialisation. In: King V, Gerisch B and Rosa H (eds) Lost in Perfection: Impacts of Optimisation on Culture and Psyche. London: Routledge, pp. 13-23.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315179964-1
Clark GL and Evans J (1998) The Private Provision of Urban Infrastructure: Financial Intermediation through Long-term Contracts. Urban Studies 35 (2): 301-319.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098984998
Clastres C (2011) Smart grids: Another step towards competition, energy security and climate change objectives. Energy Policy 39: 5399-5408.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.024
Curtis M, Torriti J and Smith ST (2018) Demand Side Flexibility and Responsiveness: Moving Demand in Time Through Technology. In: Hui A, Day R and Walker G (eds) Demanding Energy: Space, Time and Change. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 283-312.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61991-0_13
Fields D (2019) Automated Landlord: Digital technologies and post-crisis financial accumulation. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1177/03085I8X19846514
https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19846514
Goulden M, Spence A, Wardman J, Leygue C (2018) Differentiating 'the user' in DSR: Developing demand side response in advanced economies. Energy Policy 122: 176-185.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.013
Graham S (2009) When infrastructures fail. In: Graham S (ed) Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructures Fail. London: Routledge, 1-26.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203894484
Grandclément C, Pierre M, Shove E and Nadaï A (2019) Contentious Interfaces: Exploring the Junction between Collective Provision and Individual Consumption. In: Shove E and Trentmann F (eds) Infrastructures in Practice; The Dynamics of Demand in Networked Societies. Abingdon: Routledge
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351106177-15
Guy S and Marvin S (1995) Reconfiguring urban networks: demand-side management in the United Kingdom. Journal of Urban Technology 2 (3): 45-58.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10630739508724506
Guy S, Graham S and Marvin S (1999) Splintering Networks: The social, spatial and environmental implications of privatization and liberalization of utilities in Britain. In: Coutard O (ed) The Governance of Large Technical Systems. London: Routledge, pp. 149-170.
Haarstad H and Wanvik TI (2017) Carbonscapes and beyond: Conceptualizing the instability of oil landscapes. Progress in Human Geography 41 (4): 432-450.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516648007
Hamidi V, Li F and Robinson F (2009) Demand response in the UK's domestic sector. Electric Power Systems Research 79(12): 1722-1726,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2009.07.013
Hannah L (1979) Electricity Before Nationalisation. A Study of the Development of the Electricity Supply Industry in Britain to 1948. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03443-7
Harvey P, Jensen CB and Morita A (2016) Introduction: Infrastructural Complications. In: Harvey P, Jensen CB and Morita A (eds) Infrastructures and Social Complexity. A companion. Oxon: Routledge, pp. 1-22.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315622880
Helgesson C and Muniesa F (2013) For What It's Worth: An Introduction to Valuation Studies. Valuation Studies 1 (1): 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.3384/vs.2001-5992.13111
Hughes T (1993 [1983]) Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Knight ERW and Sharma R (2015) Infrastructure as a traded product: A relational approach to finance in practice. Journal of Economic Geography 16 (4): 897-916.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbv039
Kornberger M, Justesen L, Madsen AK and Mouritsen J (2015) Making Things Valuable. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198712282.001.0001
Kragh-Furbo M and Walker G (2018) Electricity as (Big) Data: Metering, spatiotemporal granularity and value. Big Data & Society. Epub ahead of print 9 February 2018. DOI: 10.1177/2053951718757254
https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718757254
Kuzemko C, Lockwood M, Mitchell C, and Hoggett R (2016) Governing for sustainable energy system change: Politics, contexts and contingency. Energy Research & Social Science 12: 96-105.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.022
Lamont M (2012) Toward a Comparative Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation. The Annual Review of Sociology 38 (21): 1-21.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120022
Langendahl P-A, Roby H, Potter S and Cook M (2019) Smoothing peaks and troughs: Intermediary practices to promote demand side response in smart grids. Energy Research & Social Science 58: 101277.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101277
Langley P (2016) Crowdfunding in the United Kingdom: A Cultural Economy. Economic Geography 92 (3): 301-321.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2015.1133233
Leszczynski A (2016) Speculative Futures: Cities, Data and Governance Beyond Smart Urbanism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 48 (9): 1691-1708.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16651445
Leyshon A and Thrift N (2007) The Capitalization of Almost Everything: The Future of Finance and Capitalism. Theory, Culture & Society 24 (7-8): 97-115.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407084699
Li B, Shen J, Wang X and Jiang C (2016) From controllable loads to generalized demand-side resources: A review of developments of demand-side resources. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 53 (January): 936-944.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.064
Lockwood M, Mitchell C, and Hoggett R (2020) Incumbent lobbying as a barrier to forward-looking regulation: The case of demand-side response in the GB capacity market for electricity. Energy Policy 140: 111426.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111426
Loftus A (2006) Reification and the dictatorship of the water meter. Antipode 38 (5): 1023-1045.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2006.00491.x
Loughran K (2014) Parks for Profit: The High Line, Growth Machines, and the Uneven Development of Urban Public Spaces. City & Community 13 (1): 49-68.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12050
MacKenzie D, Beunza D, Millo Y and Pardo-Guerra JP (2012) Drilling through the Allegheny Mountains. Journal of Cultural Economy 5 (3): 279-296.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2012.674963
Mezzadra S and Neilson B (2017) On the Multiple Frontiers of Extraction: Excavating contemporary capitalism. Cultural Studies 31(2-3): 185-204.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2017.1303425
Mitchell C (2008) The Political Economy of Sustainable Energy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Muniesa F (2012) A Flank Movement in the Understanding of Valuation. The Sociological Review 59 (s2): 24-38.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02056.x
Narsiah S and Ahmed W (2011) The Neoliberalization of the Water and Energy Sectors in South Africa and India. Journal of Asian and African Studies 47 (6): 679-694.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909611429922
National Grid (2015) Future Balancing Services. 1 October 2015.
National Grid (2016) Power Responsive. A short guide to how your business can profit from Demand Side Response. August 2016.
National Grid (2017) System Needs and Product Strategy. UK Electricity Transmission. June 2017.
National Grid (2020a) Future Energy Scenarios. GB gas and electricity transmission. July 2020.
National Grid (2020b) Power Response. Annual Report 2020. A roundup of developments in demand side flexibility markets in GB. 2020.
National Grid (2021) Commercial Aggregation Service Providers.
Ofgem (2002) The review of the first year of NETA - a review document vol. 1. 24 July 2002
O'Neill PM (2013) The financialisation of infrastructure: the role of categorisation and property relations. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 6 (3): 441-454.
https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rst017
Olkkonen L, Korjonen-Kuusipuro K and Grönberg I (2017) Redefining a stakeholder relation: Finnish energy "prosumers" as co-producers. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 24: 57-66.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.10.004
Pasquale F (2015) The Black Box Society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674736061
Powells G, Bulkeley H, Bell S and Judson E (2014) Peak electricity demand and the flexibility of everyday life. Geoforum 55: 43-52.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.04.014
Powells G and Fell M (2019) Flexibility Capital and Flexibility Justice in Smart Energy Systems. Energy Research & Social Science 54: 56-59.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.03.015
Randles S and Mander S (2011) Mobility, Markets and 'Hidden' Intermediation: Aviation and Frequent Flying. In: Guy S, Marvin S, Medd W and Moss T (eds) Shaping Urban Infrastructures: Intermediaries and the Governance of Socio-Technical Networks. London: Earthscan, pp. 75-91.
Schifferes J (2013) Profiting from Sharing (Part 2). In: RSA Blog entries, 6 August. Available at: https://www.thersa.org/blog/2013/08/profiting-from-sharing-part-2 (accessed 09.12.2022)
Star SL and Ruhleder K (1996) Steps towards an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces. Information Systems Research 7 (1): 111-134.
https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.1.111
Shove E, Watson M and Spurling N (2015) Conceptualising connections:energy demand, infrastructures and social practices. European Journal of Social Theory 18 (3): 274-287.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431015579964
Shove E and Trentmann F (2019) Infrastructures in Practice: The Dynamics of Demand in Networked Societies. Abingdon: Routledge
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351106177
Siano P (2014) Demand response and smart grids - a survey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 30 (February 14): 461-478.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.022
Silvast, A (2017) Energy, economics and performativity: Reviewing theoretical advances in social studies of markets and energy. Energy Research and Social Science 34: 4-12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.005
Smale R, Spaargaren G and van Vliet B (2019) Householders co-managing energy systems: space for collaboration? Building Research & Information 47 (5): 585-597.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2019.1540548
Spence A, Demski C, Butler C, Parkhill K and Pidgeon N (2015) Public perceptions of demand-side management and a smarter energy future. Nature Climate Change 5 (2015): 550-554.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2610
Thatcher J, O'Sullivan D and Mahmoudi D (2016) Data colonialism through accumulation by dispossession: New metaphors for daily data. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34 (6): 990-1006.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816633195
The Energyst (2019) Demand Side Response: Shifting Value. 2019 report. London: Energyst Media
Torrance MI (2008) Forging Glocal Governance? Urban Infrastructures as Networked Financial Products. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (1): 1-21.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00756.x
Torriti J (2016) Peak Energy Demand and Demand Side Response. London: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315781099
Torriti J and Grunewald P (2014) Demand side response: patterns in Europe and future policy perspectives under capacity mechanisms. Economics of Energy & Environment Policy 3 (1): 87-105.
https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.3.1.jtor
Walker G (2021) Energy and Rhythm: Rhythmanalysis for a Low Carbon Future. London, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc.
Whiteside H (2019) The state's estate: Devaluing and revaluing 'surplus' public land in Canada. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 51 (2):505-526.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17723631
Zook M and Grote MH (2016) The microgeographies of global finance: High-frequency trading and the construction of information inequality. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49 (1): 121-140.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2023-09-15 (2)
- 2022-12-19 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Mette Kragh-Furbo, Gordon Walker, Mitchell Curtis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Terms & Conditions
This Science & Technology Studies website ("Site") is owned and operated by The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies (“Society”). The Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies and its publication Science & Technology Studies are non-profit organizations.
By accessing or using the Site, you agree to be bound by the terms and conditions below ("Terms and Conditions"). These Terms and Conditions incorporate by reference and include the Site's Privacy Policy and any guidelines, rules or disclaimers that may be posted and updated on specific web pages or on notices that are sent to you. If you do not agree with these Terms and Conditions, please do not use this Site.
The Society reserves the right to change, modify, add or remove portions of these Terms and Conditions at its discretion at any time and without prior notice. Please check this page periodically for any modifications. Your continued use of this Site following the posting of any changes will mean that you have accepted the changes.
Copyrights and Limitations on Use
Content on this website is protected by Creative Commons license CC BY 4.0. The copyright of articles remains with the authors but the license permits other users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the published articles. Using and sharing the content is permitted as long as original materials are appropriately credited. Metadata (e.g. the article title) is an exeption - this is licensed under CC0 that permits the distribution of the article information - not content - in archives and databases.
The Site may contain robot exclusion headers, and by using the Site you agree that you will not use any robots, spiders, crawlers or other automated downloading programs or devices to access, search, index, monitor or copy any Content. The harvesting of postal or email addresses from the Site for purposes of sending unsolicited or unauthorized commercial material, is prohibited.
You may not use the services on the Site to publish or distribute any information (including software or other content) that is illegal; violates or infringes upon the rights of any other person; is abusive, hateful, profane, pornographic, threatening or vulgar; contains errors, viruses or other harmful components; or is otherwise actionable by law. Science & Technology Studies may at any time exercise editorial control over the content of any information or material that is submitted or distributed through its facilities and/or services.
You may not, without the approval of Science & Technology Studies, use the Site to publish or distribute any advertising, promotional material, or solicitation to other users of the Site to use any goods or services. For example (but without limitation), you may not use the Site to conduct any business, to solicit the performance of any activity that is prohibited by law, or to solicit other users to become subscribers of other information services. Similarly, you may not use the Site to download and redistribute public information or shareware for personal gain or use the facilities and/or services to distribute multiple copies of public domain information or shareware.
Trademarks
All trademarks appearing on this Site are the property of their respective owners.
Links to Other Sites
The Site may contain hyperlinks to other sites or resources that are provided solely for your convenience. Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability of external sites or resources linked to the Site, and does not endorse and is not responsible or liable for any content, advertising, products or other materials on or available from such sites or resources. Transactions that occur between you and any third party are strictly between you and the third party and are not the responsibility of Science & Technology Studies. Due to the fact that Science & Technology Studies is not responsible for the availability or accuracy of these outside resources or their contents, you should review the terms and conditions and privacy policies of these linked sites, as their policies may differ from ours.
Last revised: 3 Aug 2020
