“Should We Stay or Should We Go now?”

Dis/Engaging with Emerging Technosciences



In this paper we focus on a special feature of science and technology studies: the trajectories of our engagement with ‘emerging technosciences’. Many of us entertain close links to a particular group of scientists; our scholarly careers and identities build around thematic specialisations, trans-field collaborations and convivialities. But more often than not, such engagement does not last a whole career. With every new technoscientific hype, scholars are pressed to ‘move on’, to disengage from one field and re-engage with another. It thus seems warranted to explicitly reflect on the temporal patterns of dis/engagement and to look at possible ramifications for individuals, collectives, and the innovation system at large. To inform such reflection, we opted for a mixed-methods approach, tracing patterns and moments of dis/engagement across various disciplines based on scientometric analysis, individual archaeologies of engagement, a qualitative survey, and a focused discussion among fellow scholars from the social sciences and humanities as well as the sciences. Our analysis brings distinct dis/engagement patterns to the fore, relating to disciplinary affiliations as well as career stages. In our conclusion, we discuss the relevance of these findings for science and technology studies scholars and technoscientists as well as for contemporary innovation regimes more generally.


Download data is not yet available.
Research Papers


2023-06-26 — Updated on 2024-02-15


How to Cite

Kastenhofer, K. and Vermeulen, N. (2024) “‘Should We Stay or Should We Go now?’: Dis/Engaging with Emerging Technosciences”, Science & Technology Studies, 37(1), pp. 21–43. doi: 10.23987/sts.113479.