Forthcoming

(Not) Knowing and (Not) Caring About Animal Research

An Analysis of Writing From the Mass Observation Project

Authors

  • Renelle McGlacken University of Nottingham

Abstract

Animal research remains a practice marked by controversy and moral dilemma. However, UK science-society dialogues on the issue are increasingly managed via one-way transmissions of information which construct publics as passive and attribute their concerns to a lack of ‘correct’ knowledge. Challenging such assumptions, this paper questions how and why people actively manage their interactions with animal research through entangled practices of knowing and caring. Based on an analysis of writing from the UK Mass Observation Project, this paper explores difficulties and discomforts associated with animal research which can cause strategic withdrawals from engagements with the topic. In doing so, it extends existing concepts of ‘uncomfortable knowledge’ (Rayner) and ‘strategic ignorance’ (McGoey) to develop novel concepts of ‘uncomfortable’ and ‘strategic’ care. Finally, in examining desires to respond to animal research, I engage with Haraway’s notion of ‘response-ability’ to introduce the concepts of ‘responsive caring’ and ‘responsive knowing’

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Section
Research Papers

Published

2021-10-11

How to Cite

McGlacken, R. (2021) “(Not) Knowing and (Not) Caring About Animal Research: An Analysis of Writing From the Mass Observation Project”, Science & Technology Studies. doi: 10.23987/sts.102496.